Literature DB >> 29880299

Outcomes of 4838 patients requiring temporary transvenous cardiac pacing: A statewide cohort study.

Austin Chin Chwan Ng1, Jerrett K Lau2, Vincent Chow2, Dona Adikari2, David Brieger2, Leonard Kritharides2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Temporary-transvenous-cardiac-pacing (TTCP) is a potentially lifesaving procedure, however trends in its utilization and outcomes in unselected contemporary populations are all unknown.
METHODS: Consecutive patients requiring TTCP between July-1, 2000 and December-31, 2013 were identified from a statewide registry of admitted patients. In addition, all patients who underwent other cardiac procedures including permanent-pacemaker (PPM) implantation, automated-implantable-cardiac-defibrillator (AICD) implantation, percutaneous-coronary-intervention (PCI), or coronary-artery-bypass-graft (CABG) surgery were identified for comparative outcome analyses. Survival was tracked from a statewide death registry.
RESULTS: A total of 4838 patients (mean age [±standard deviation] 74.7 ± 12.7 years; 58.0% males) requiring TTCP were identified. The incidence for TTCP was 5.86 ± 1.06 cases per-100,000-persons-per-annum, declining by 46% between 2003 and 2013. During 4.2 ± 3.7 years of follow-up, 2594 (53.6%) patients died, of whom 569 (11.8%) died during the index admission. Weekend admission was associated with increased mortality compared to weekdays (hazard ratio: 1.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-1.26, p = 0.002) and independently predicted all-cause death. After adjusting for age, gender, comorbidities, and referral source for admission, patients requiring TTCP had worse survival than those undergoing PPM (n = 17,988) or AICD (n = 5264) implantation, PCI (n = 46,859), or CABG surgery (n = 50,992) (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 2.14, 95% CI 1.94-2.37; aHR: 1.61, 95% CI 1.41-1.83; aHR: 1.76, 95% CI 1.61-1.93; aHR: 2.09, 95% CI 1.98-2.21 respectively, all p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: TTCP utilization is decreasing and is associated with substantial in-hospital and long-term mortality with weekend-weekday variation in outcome. Further studies are needed to develop strategies to better understand the determinants of adverse outcomes of these patients, as well as appropriate strategies for outcome improvement.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiovascular intervention; Mortality; Outcome; Pacing

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29880299     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.05.112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  7 in total

Review 1.  A comprehensive scoping review on transvenous temporary pacing therapy.

Authors:  F V Y Tjong; U W de Ruijter; N E G Beurskens; R E Knops
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.380

2.  A real-world comparison of outcomes between fractional flow reserve-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Christopher C Y Wong; Austin C C Ng; Cuneyt Ada; Vincent Chow; William F Fearon; Martin K C Ng; Leonard Kritharides; Andy S C Yong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Bedside Temporary Transvenous Pacemaker Insertion in the Emergency Department: A Single-Center Experience.

Authors:  Bihter Senturk; Servan Kucuk; Sevilay Vural; Erdal Demirtas; Figen Coskun
Journal:  Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul       Date:  2021-09-24

4.  Implantation of cardiac electronic devices in active COVID-19 patients: Results from an international survey.

Authors:  Oholi Tovia-Brodie; Moshe Rav Acha; Bernard Belhassen; Alessio Gasperetti; Marco Schiavone; Giovanni Battista Forleo; Milton E Guevara-Valdivia; David Valdeolivar Ruiz; Nicolas Lellouche; David Hamon; Davide Castagno; Matteo Bellettini; Gaetano M De Ferrari; Mikael Laredo; Jean-Baptiste Carvès; Barbara Ignatiuk; Giampaolo Pasquetto; Paolo De Filippo; Giovanni Malanchini; Behzad B Pavri; Craig Raphael; Luigi Rivetti; Roberto Mantovan; Jason Chinitz; Melissa Harding; Giuseppe Boriani; Edoardo Casali; Elaine Y Wan; Angelo Biviano; Carlos Macias; Stepan Havranek; Pietro Enea Lazzerini; Antonio M Canu; Marco Zardini; Giulio Conte; Óscar Cano; Michela Casella; Boris Rudic; Alexander Omelchenko; Nilesh Mathuria; Gaurav A Upadhyay; Asaf Danon; Arie Lorin Schwartz; Philippe Maury; Shiro Nakahara; Gustavo Goldenberg; Nicolas Schaerli; Sergiy Bereza; Angelo Auricchio; Michael Glikson; Yoav Michowitz
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 6.343

5.  Rate of permanent cardiac implantable electronic device infections after active fixation temporary transvenous pacing: A nationwide Danish cohort study.

Authors:  Maria Hee Jung Park Frausing; Jens Cosedis Nielsen; Jens Brock Johansen; Ole Dan Jørgensen; Thomas Olsen; Christian Gerdes; Jens Kristensen; Mads Brix Kronborg
Journal:  Heart Rhythm O2       Date:  2021-11-18

6.  Real-time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiographic guidance versus fluoroscopic guidance for transvenous temporary cardiac pacemaker implantation during transcatheter aortic valve implantation surgeries.

Authors:  Zhongming Cao; Jindong Xu; Jian Liu; Min Wu; Nianjin Xie; Xiaogang Guo; Huiming Guo; Sheng Wang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-10

7.  Myocardial Injury After Temporary Transvenous Cardiac Pacing.

Authors:  Meng Liu; Pingsheng Wu
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 2.423

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.