Literature DB >> 29880291

Olaparib combined with abiraterone in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial.

Noel Clarke1, Pawel Wiechno2, Boris Alekseev3, Nuria Sala4, Robert Jones5, Ivo Kocak6, Vincenzo Emanuele Chiuri7, Jacek Jassem8, Aude Fléchon9, Charles Redfern10, Carsten Goessl11, Joseph Burgents11, Robert Kozarski12, Darren Hodgson13, Maria Learoyd12, Fred Saad14.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and homologous recombination repair (HRR) mutations have a better response to treatment with the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib than patients without HRR mutations. Preclinical data suggest synergy between olaparib and androgen pathway inhibitors. We aimed to assess the efficacy of olaparib plus the androgen pathway inhibitor abiraterone in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer regardless of HRR mutation status.
METHODS: We carried out this double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial at 41 urological oncology sites in 11 countries across Europe and North America. Eligible male patients were aged 18 years or older with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who had previously received docetaxel and were candidates for abiraterone treatment. Patients were excluded if they had received more than two previous lines of chemotherapy, or had previous exposure to second-generation antihormonal drugs. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) using an interactive voice or web response system, without stratification, to receive oral olaparib 300 mg twice daily or placebo. All patients received oral abiraterone 1000 mg once daily and prednisone or prednisolone 5 mg twice daily. Patients and investigators were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS; based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 and Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 2 criteria). Efficacy analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population, which included all randomly assigned patients, and safety analyses included all patients who received at least one dose of olaparib or placebo. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01972217, and is no longer recruiting patients.
FINDINGS: Between Nov 25, 2014, and July 14, 2015, 171 patients were assessed for eligibility. Of those, 142 patients were randomly assigned to receive olaparib and abiraterone (n=71) or placebo and abiraterone (n=71). The clinical cutoff date for the final analysis was Sept 22, 2017. Median rPFS was 13·8 months (95% CI 10·8-20·4) with olaparib and abiraterone and 8·2 months (5·5-9·7) with placebo and abiraterone (hazard ratio [HR] 0·65, 95% CI 0·44-0·97, p=0·034). The most common grade 1-2 adverse events were nausea (26 [37%] patients in the olaparib group vs 13 [18%] patients in the placebo group), constipation (18 [25%] vs eight [11%]), and back pain (17 [24%] vs 13 [18%]). 38 (54%) of 71 patients in the olaparib and abiraterone group and 20 (28%) of 71 patients in the placebo and abiraterone group had grade 3 or worse adverse events, including anaemia (in 15 [21%] of 71 patients vs none of 71), pneumonia (four [6%] vs three [4%]), and myocardial infarction (four [6%] vs none). Serious adverse events were reported by 24 (34%) of 71 patients receiving olaparib and abiraterone (seven of which were related to treatment) and 13 (18%) of 71 patients receiving placebo and abiraterone (one of which was related to treatment). One treatment-related death (pneumonitis) occurred in the olaparib and abiraterone group.
INTERPRETATION: Olaparib in combination with abiraterone provided clinical efficacy benefit for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer compared with abiraterone alone. More serious adverse events were observed in patients who received olaparib and abiraterone than abiraterone alone. Our data suggest that the combination of olaparib and abiraterone might provide an additional clinical benefit to a broad population of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. FUNDING: AstraZeneca.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29880291     DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30365-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  81 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacological methods to transcriptionally modulate double-strand break DNA repair.

Authors:  Alanna R Kaplan; Peter M Glazer
Journal:  Int Rev Cell Mol Biol       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 6.813

Review 2.  Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Prostate Cancer Development: Therapeutic Implications.

Authors:  Ugo Testa; Germana Castelli; Elvira Pelosi
Journal:  Medicines (Basel)       Date:  2019-07-30

Review 3.  Familial/inherited cancer syndrome: a focus on the highly consanguineous Arab population.

Authors:  Fawz S AlHarthi; Alya Qari; Alaa Edress; Malak Abedalthagafi
Journal:  NPJ Genom Med       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 8.617

Review 4.  PARP inhibitors as a new therapeutic option in metastatic prostate cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Raffaele Ratta; Annalisa Guida; Florian Scotté; Yann Neuzillet; Asmahane Benmaziane Teillet; Thierry Lebret; Philippe Beuzeboc
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 5.554

Review 5.  Targeting the androgen receptor and overcoming resistance in prostate cancer.

Authors:  David J Einstein; Seiji Arai; Steven P Balk
Journal:  Curr Opin Oncol       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 3.645

Review 6.  [Systemic treatment of advanced prostate cancer].

Authors:  Alexander Kretschmer; Tilman Todenhöfer
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 0.639

7.  Cediranib suppresses homology-directed DNA repair through down-regulation of BRCA1/2 and RAD51.

Authors:  Alanna R Kaplan; Susan E Gueble; Yanfeng Liu; Sebastian Oeck; Hoon Kim; Zhong Yun; Peter M Glazer
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 17.956

Review 8.  Targeting treatment options for castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Dannah R Miller; Matthew A Ingersoll; Benjamin A Teply; Ming-Fong Lin
Journal:  Am J Clin Exp Urol       Date:  2021-02-15

Review 9.  Targeting DNA Repair Defects for Precision Medicine in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Alejandro Athie; Sara Arce-Gallego; Macarena Gonzalez; Rafael Morales-Barrera; Cristina Suarez; Teresa Casals Galobart; Gonzalo Hernandez Viedma; Joan Carles; Joaquin Mateo
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 10.  Navigating systemic therapy for metastatic castration-naïve prostate cancer.

Authors:  E M Kwan; I A Thangasamy; J Teh; O Alghazo; N J Sathianathen; N Lawrentschuk; A A Azad
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.