Literature DB >> 29880237

Assessing the recent estimates of the global burden of disease for ambient air pollution: Methodological changes and implications for low- and middle-income countries.

Bart Ostro1, Joseph V Spadaro2, Sophie Gumy3, Pierpaolo Mudu3, Yewande Awe4, Francesco Forastiere5, Annette Peters6.   

Abstract

The Global Burden of Disease (GBD) is a comparative assessment of the health impact of the major and well-established risk factors, including ambient air pollution (AAP) assessed by concentrations of PM2.5 (particles less than 2.5 µm) and ozone. Over the last two decades, major improvements have emerged for two important inputs in the methodology for estimating the impacts of PM2.5: the assessment of global exposure to PM2.5 and the development of integrated exposure risk models (IERs) that relate the entire range of global exposures of PM2.5 to cause-specific mortality. As a result, the estimated annual mortality attributed to AAP increased from less than 1 million in 2000 to roughly 3 million for GBD in years 2010 and 2013, to 4.2 million for GBD 2015. However, the magnitude of the recent change and uncertainty regarding its rationale have resulted, in some cases, in skepticism and reduced confidence in the overall estimates. To understand the underlying reasons for the change in mortality, we examined the estimates for the years 2013 and 2015 to determine the quantitative implications of alternative model input assumptions. We calculated that the year 2013 estimates increased by 8% after applying the updated exposure data used in GBD 2015, and increased by 23% with the application of the updated IERs from GBD 2015. The application of both upgraded methodologies together increased the GBD 2013 estimates by 35%, or about one million deaths. We also quantified the impact of the changes in demographics and the assumed threshold level. Since the global estimates of air pollution-related deaths will continue to change over time, a clear documentation of the modifications in the methodology and their impacts is necessary. In addition, there is need for additional monitoring and epidemiological studies to reduce uncertainties in the estimates for low- and medium-income countries, which contribute to about one-half of the mortality.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Air pollution; Fine particles; Global Burden of Disease; Health impacts; Mortality; PM2.5

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29880237     DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2018.03.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Res        ISSN: 0013-9351            Impact factor:   6.498


  11 in total

1.  PM2.5 chemical composition and geographical origin of air masses in Cape Town, South Africa.

Authors:  John Williams; Leslie Petrik; Janine Wichmann
Journal:  Air Qual Atmos Health       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 3.763

2.  Estimates of the Global Burden of Ambient [Formula: see text], Ozone, and [Formula: see text] on Asthma Incidence and Emergency Room Visits.

Authors:  Susan C Anenberg; Daven K Henze; Veronica Tinney; Patrick L Kinney; William Raich; Neal Fann; Chris S Malley; Henry Roman; Lok Lamsal; Bryan Duncan; Randall V Martin; Aaron van Donkelaar; Michael Brauer; Ruth Doherty; Jan Eiof Jonson; Yanko Davila; Kengo Sudo; Johan C I Kuylenstierna
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 3.  Air Pollution and Cognitive Impairment across the Life Course in Humans: A Systematic Review with Specific Focus on Income Level of Study Area.

Authors:  Mina Chandra; Chandra Bhushan Rai; Neelam Kumari; Vipindeep Kaur Sandhu; Kalpana Chandra; Murali Krishna; Sri Harsha Kota; Kuljeet Singh Anand; Anna Oudin
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Indoor Air Quality in Tujia Dwellings in Hunan, China: Field Tests, Numerical Simulations, and Mitigation Strategies.

Authors:  Fupeng Zhang; Lei Shi; Simian Liu; Jiaqi Shi; Mengfei Cheng
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-09       Impact factor: 4.614

5.  Ambient PM2.5 and O3 pollution and health impacts in Iranian megacity.

Authors:  Rajab Rashidi; Yusef Omidi Khaniabadi; Pierre Sicard; Alessandra De Marco; Khatereh Anbari
Journal:  Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess       Date:  2022-08-07       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 6.  Sensor-as-a-Service: Convergence of Sensor Analytic Point Solutions (SNAPS) and Pay-A-Penny-Per-Use (PAPPU) Paradigm as a Catalyst for Democratization of Healthcare in Underserved Communities.

Authors:  Victoria Morgan; Lisseth Casso-Hartmann; David Bahamon-Pinzon; Kelli McCourt; Robert G Hjort; Sahar Bahramzadeh; Irene Velez-Torres; Eric McLamore; Carmen Gomes; Evangelyn C Alocilja; Nirajan Bhusal; Sunaina Shrestha; Nisha Pote; Ruben Kenny Briceno; Shoumen Palit Austin Datta; Diana C Vanegas
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-01

7.  Air-Pollution Control in an Emergent Market: Does It Work? Evidence from Romania.

Authors:  Ionica Oncioiu; Tatiana Dănescu; Maria-Alexandra Popa
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 8.  The role of burden of disease assessment in tracking progress towards achieving WHO global air quality guidelines.

Authors:  Dimitris Evangelopoulos; Roman Perez-Velasco; Heather Walton; Sophie Gumy; Martin Williams; Frank J Kelly; Nino Künzli
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 3.380

9.  Combined exposure to formaldehyde and PM2.5: Hematopoietic toxicity and molecular mechanism in mice.

Authors:  Jing Ge; Honglian Yang; Xianxian Lu; Shenqi Wang; Yun Zhao; Jiawei Huang; Zhuge Xi; Luoping Zhang; Rui Li
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 9.621

10.  Selective Mid-IR Metamaterial-Based Gas Sensor System: Proof of Concept and Performances Tests.

Authors:  Laura Mihai; Razvan Mihalcea; Roxana Tomescu; Costel Paun; Dana Cristea
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 5.076

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.