| Literature DB >> 29879910 |
Jun-Yu Chen1, Hong-Wei Zhang1, Hua-Li Zhang1, Jie-Zheng Ying1, Liang-Yong Ma2, Jie-Yun Zhuang3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Rice is highly sensitive to temperature fluctuations. Recently, the frequent occurrence of high temperature stress has heavily influenced rice production. Proper heading date in specific environmental conditions could ensure high grain yield. Rice heading greatly depends on the accurate measurement of environmental changes, particularly in day length and temperature. In contrary to the detailed understanding of the photoperiod pathway, little has been known about how temperature regulates the genetic control of rice heading.Entities:
Keywords: Adaption; Grain filling; Heading date; Quantitative trait locus; Rice; Temperature response
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29879910 PMCID: PMC5992824 DOI: 10.1186/s12870-018-1330-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Plant Biol ISSN: 1471-2229 Impact factor: 4.215
The multiple sowing-date experiment conducted in Hangzhou in 2015
| Trial | Sowing date | Transplanting date | Traits measured |
|---|---|---|---|
| I | 28 April | 25 May | HD, yield traits |
| II | 8 May | 2 June | HD |
| III | 20 May | 11 June | HD, yield traits |
| IV | 15 June | 6 July | HD, yield traits |
| V | 9 July | 29 July | HD |
HD heading date; yield traits measured included number of panicle per plant (NP), number of grains per panicle (NGP), 1000-grain weight (TGW, g), spikelet fertility (SF, %) and grain yield per plant (GY, g)
Fig. 1Effects of qHd1 on heading date (a) and 1000-grain weight (b) detected in the multiple sowing-date experiment. I, III and IV in (b) refer to the trials with sowing date of 28 Apr, 20 May, and 15 Jun in (a), respectively. In all the trials, 50 lines of each genotype in the CJ1 and CJ2 populations were tested. Values are represented as means ±SD. NIL-ZS97 and NIL-MY46 are near isogenic lines with Zhenshan 97 and Milyang 46 homozygous genotypes at qHd1, respectively
Effects of qHd1 on heading date tested in the multiple sowing-date experiment
| Trial | Population | Phenotypic meana |
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Sowing date) | name | NILZS97 | NILMY46 | |||
| Trial-I (28 Apr) | CJ1 | 79.3 | 76.0 | < 0.0001 | −1.6 | 58.6 |
| CJ2 | 79.9 | 76.5 | < 0.0001 | −1.7 | 59.4 | |
| Trial-II (8 May) | CJ1 | 74.1 | 71.3 | < 0.0001 | −1.4 | 54.0 |
| CJ2 | 73.7 | 70.9 | < 0.0001 | −1.4 | 62.0 | |
| Trial-III (20 May) | CJ1 | 69.3 | 66.1 | < 0.0001 | −1.6 | 76.8 |
| CJ2 | 69.5 | 65.7 | < 0.0001 | −1.9 | 81.2 | |
| Trial-IV (15 Jun) | CJ1 | 69.1 | 61.5 | < 0.0001 | −3.8 | 79.6 |
| CJ2 | 69.5 | 61.2 | < 0.0001 | −4.2 | 90.4 | |
| Trial-V (9 Jul) | CJ1 | 69.6 | 58.3 | < 0.0001 | −5.6 | 81.6 |
| CJ2 | 69.6 | 58.2 | < 0.0001 | −5.7 | 88.4 | |
aNILZS97 and NILMY46 are near isogenic lines having homozygous qHd1 alleles from Zhenshan 97 and Milyang 46, respectively
badditive effect of replacing a Zhenshan 97 allele with a Milyang 46 allele
cproportion of phenotypic variance explained by the QTL effect
Effects of qHd1 on yield traits in Trail-I, III and IV of the multiple sowing-date experiment
| Trial | Trait | CJ1-Phenotypic meana |
|
| CJ2-Phenotypic mean |
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Sowing date) | NILZS97 | NILMY46 | NILZS97 | NILMY46 | |||||||
| I (28 Apr) | NP | 6.61 | 6.43 | 0.1769 | 6.82 | 6.46 | 0.0087 | −0.18 | 3.6 | ||
| NGP | 109.4 | 109.4 | 0.9649 | 105.2 | 106.7 | 0.3825 | |||||
| TGW | 25.50 | 25.71 | < 0.0001 | 0.11 | 9.5 | 25.40 | 25.49 | 0.1194 | |||
| SF | 88.17 | 89.02 | 0.1391 | 88.13 | 88.15 | 0.9611 | |||||
| GY | 17.36 | 16.70 | 0.0599 | 17.56 | 16.53 | 0.0086 | −0.51 | 3.6 | |||
| III (20 May) | NP | 7.16 | 7.15 | 0.9210 | 6.65 | 6.71 | 0.6642 | ||||
| NGP | 110.1 | 105.6 | 0.0001 | −2.28 | 7.3 | 115.0 | 108.9 | < 0.0001 | −3.07 | 9.9 | |
| TGW | 24.74 | 24.56 | 0.0002 | −0.09 | 8.1 | 25.02 | 24.80 | 0.0004 | −0.11 | 8.4 | |
| SF | 83.23 | 83.46 | 0.5555 | 83.94 | 84.88 | 0.0418 | 0.47 | 2.0 | |||
| GY | 18.55 | 17.72 | 0.0500 | 18.32 | 17.57 | 0.0701 | |||||
| IV (15 Jun) | NP | 8.46 | 8.59 | 0.5240 | 7.82 | 7.83 | 0.9624 | ||||
| NGP | 101.4 | 98.9 | 0.1892 | 106.5 | 105.6 | 0.5625 | |||||
| TGW | 27.04 | 25.06 | < 0.0001 | −0.99 | 68.3 | 26.73 | 24.36 | < 0.0001 | −1.19 | 79.6 | |
| SF | 82.11 | 84.20 | 0.0005 | 1.05 | 7.3 | 83.34 | 85.32 | 0.0014 | 0.99 | 5.9 | |
| GY | 20.74 | 18.96 | 0.0006 | −0.89 | 6.6 | 20.57 | 18.37 | < 0.0001 | −1.10 | 9.8 | |
NP number of panicle per plant, NGP number of grains per panicle, TGW 1000-grain weight (g), SF spikelet fertility rate (%), GY grain yield per plant (g)
aNILZS97 and NILMY46 are near isogenic lines having homozygous qHd1 alleles from Zhenshan 97 and Milyang 46, respectively
badditive effect of replacing a Zhenshan 97 allele with a Milyang 46 allele
cproportion of phenotypic variance explained by the QTL effect
Fig. 2The temperature-gradient test in phytotron. Heading date of NIL-ZS97 and NIL-MY46 were the averaged data of 16 plants for each genotype. Values are represented as means ±SD
Fig. 3A large sequence structure variation of 9.5-kb in the 1st intron of OsMADS51. Zhenshan 97 contains a 9.5-kb insertion as compared to Milyang 46
Fig. 4Comparisons of the gene expression. OsMADS51, OsSPL2, Hd1, Ehd1, RFT1 and Hd3a were tested between ZS97 and MY46 homozygous lines of the CJ1 population by qRT-PCR in 30, 35, and 45 days after sowing. Values are represented as means ± SE, derived from three biological replicates with two technical repetitions each. UBQ, ubiqutin used to normalize the values. *P < 0.05 or **P < 0.01, by Student’s t-test
Fig. 5Overview of differentially expressed genes identified by RNA-seq. a Venn diagram illustrates unique and common genes differentially regulated in the high- and low-temperature treatment. b Histogram shows the number of genes up-regulated and down-regulated in the high- and low-temperature treatments of NIL-ZS97 as compared to NIL-MY46