Literature DB >> 29879864

Utility of the Psychosocial Assessment of Candidates for Transplantation in Patients Undergoing Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.

Meghana Halkar1, Amy S Nowacki2, Kay Kendall3, Nephertiti Efeovbokhan4, Eiran Z Gorodeski5, Nader Moazami6, Randall C Starling5, James B Young5, Sangjin Lee7, W H Wilson Tang5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Psychosocial assessment of patients comprises an important element in the selection process of appropriate candidates for left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. We sought to determine the association of the well-validated psychosocial assessment of candidates for transplantation (PACT) scale to clinical outcomes post-LVAD implantation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The PACT scale was used retrospectively to reconstruct psychosocial profiles of all patients who underwent a continuous-flow LVAD implantation for all indications at our institution between March 2008 and August 2012 (N = 230). Psychosocial elements including social support, psychological health, lifestyle factors, comprehension of the operation, and follow-up were evaluated. The primary outcome was overall survival, and the secondary outcomes were hospital readmission, pump thrombosis, hemolysis, gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, and LVAD driveline infections.
RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 55.3 years, with 83% being male; 58% (N = 135) were bridge to transplant and 42% (N = 95) were destination therapy. Up to 1-year post-LVAD implant, there were no statistical differences among the 5 PACT candidate groups in terms of survival ( P = .79), hospital readmissions ( P = .55), suspected or confirmed pump thrombosis ( P = .31), hemolysis ( P = .43), GI bleeding ( P = .71), or driveline infections ( P = .06).
CONCLUSIONS: In this single-center retrospective review, post hoc reconstruction of psychosocial profiles using the PACT scale and independent assessment of postimplant outcomes, including survival and adverse events, did not show any association. However, given the small number of patients in the low score PACT groups as well as limited duration of follow-up, further studies are required to elucidate the association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  left ventricular assist device; outcomes; psychosocial

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29879864     DOI: 10.1177/1526924818781559

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Transplant        ISSN: 1526-9248            Impact factor:   1.187


  4 in total

1.  Psychosocial Risk and Its Association With Outcomes in Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Patients.

Authors:  Ersilia M DeFilippis; Khadijah Breathett; Elena M Donald; Shunichi Nakagawa; Koji Takeda; Hiroo Takayama; Lauren K Truby; Gabriel Sayer; Paolo C Colombo; Melana Yuzefpolskaya; Nir Uriel; Maryjane A Farr; Veli K Topkara
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 8.790

Review 2.  Are the current evaluation tools for advanced therapies biased?

Authors:  Raymond C Givens
Journal:  Curr Opin Cardiol       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 2.108

Review 3.  The Approach to the Psychosocial Evaluation of Cardiac Transplant and Mechanical Circulatory Support Candidates.

Authors:  Mary Amanda Dew; Andrea F DiMartini; Fabienne Dobbels; Kathleen L Grady; Sheila G Jowsey-Gregoire; Annemarie Kaan; Kay Kendall; Quincy-Robyn Young
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2019-12

4.  The Impact of a High-risk Psychosocial Assessment on Outcomes After Durable Mechanical Circulatory Support.

Authors:  Michelle M Kittleson; Heather Barone; Robert M Cole; Megan Olman; Alisa Fishman; Linda Olanisa; Carmelita Runyan; Jennifer Hajj; Newman Huie; Michael Lindsay; Nancy Sun; Eric Luong; Susan Cheng; Elizabeth Passano; Jon A Kobashigawa; Fardad Esmailian; Danny Ramzy; Jaime D Moriguchi
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 3.826

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.