Tomoya Hirota1, Ryuhei So2, Young Shin Kim3, Bennett Leventhal3, Richard A Epstein4. 1. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Langley Porter Psychiatric Institute, University of California San Francisco, 401 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA. Electronic address: tomoya.hirota@ucsf.edu. 2. Department of Psychiatry, Okayama Psychiatric Medical Center, 3-16 Shikatahonmachi, Kita-ward, Okayama, Okayama, 700-0915, Japan; Department of Health Promotion and Human Behavior, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine/School of Public Health, Kyoto, Japan. 3. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Langley Porter Psychiatric Institute, University of California San Francisco, 401 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA. 4. Chapin Hall Center for Children at the University of Chicago, 1313 E 60th St., Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Existing reviews of screening tools for Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) focus on young children, and not all screening tools have been examined against validated diagnostic procedures. AIMS: To examine the validity of screening tools for ASD in non-young children and adults to provide clinical recommendations about the use of these tools in a variety of clinical settings. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Electronic databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO, Cochrane Library and CINAHL, were searched through March 2017. Studies examining the validity of ASD screening tools against the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule and/or the Autism Diagnostic Interview - Revised in non-young children (age 4 or above) and adults were included. Three authors independently reviewed each article for data extraction and quality assessment. OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: 14 studies met the inclusion criteria, of which 11 studies were with children (4-18 years of age) and 3 studies included adults only (19 years of age and above). Included studies were conducted in a general population/low-risk sample (N = 3) and a clinically referred/high-risk sample (N = 11). In total 11 tools were included. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Only three screening tools (the Autism-Spectrum Quotient, the Social Communication Questionnaire, and the Social Responsiveness Scale) were examined in more than 2 studies. These tools may assist in differentiating ASD from other neurodevelopmental and psychiatric disorders or typically developed children. In young adult populations, the paucity of the existing research in this group limits definitive conclusion and recommendations. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
BACKGROUND: Existing reviews of screening tools for Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) focus on young children, and not all screening tools have been examined against validated diagnostic procedures. AIMS: To examine the validity of screening tools for ASD in non-young children and adults to provide clinical recommendations about the use of these tools in a variety of clinical settings. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Electronic databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO, Cochrane Library and CINAHL, were searched through March 2017. Studies examining the validity of ASD screening tools against the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule and/or the Autism Diagnostic Interview - Revised in non-young children (age 4 or above) and adults were included. Three authors independently reviewed each article for data extraction and quality assessment. OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: 14 studies met the inclusion criteria, of which 11 studies were with children (4-18 years of age) and 3 studies included adults only (19 years of age and above). Included studies were conducted in a general population/low-risk sample (N = 3) and a clinically referred/high-risk sample (N = 11). In total 11 tools were included. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Only three screening tools (the Autism-Spectrum Quotient, the Social Communication Questionnaire, and the Social Responsiveness Scale) were examined in more than 2 studies. These tools may assist in differentiating ASD from other neurodevelopmental and psychiatric disorders or typically developed children. In young adult populations, the paucity of the existing research in this group limits definitive conclusion and recommendations. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Entities:
Keywords:
Adults; Autism; Non-young children; Screening; The autism diagnostic interview, revised; The autism diagnostic observation schedule
Authors: Catherine R G Jones; Sarah L Barrett; Ieva Bite; Maria Legzdina; Kristina Arina; Andrea Higgins; Kyla Honey; Sarah J Carrington; Dale Hay; Johanna Condon; Susan R Leekam Journal: Mol Autism Date: 2020-08-15 Impact factor: 7.509