Literature DB >> 29879197

Mortality due to snakebite and other venomous animals in the Indian state of Bihar: Findings from a representative mortality study.

Rakhi Dandona1,2, G Anil Kumar1, Archana Kharyal1, Sibin George1, Md Akbar1, Lalit Dandona1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Animal bites and stings contribute significantly to mortality in certain parts of the world. India accounts for the highest number of snakebites and related mortality globally. We report on mortality due to bite or sting of a venomous animal from a population-based study in the Indian state of Bihar which estimated the causes of death using verbal autopsy. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: Interviews were conducted for all deaths that occurred from January 2012 to March 2014 in 109,689 households (87.1% participation) covering 627,658 population in 1,017 clusters representative of the state using the Population Health Metrics Research Consortium shortened verbal autopsy questionnaire. Cause of death was assigned using the SmartVA automated algorithm. The annualized mortality rate per 100,000 population due to snakebite, scorpion sting and other animals adjusted for age, sex and urban-rural population distribution of the state; and detailed contextual information on snakebites are reported. Deaths due to bite/sting of a venomous animal accounted for 10.7% of all deaths due to unintentional injuries, with an adjusted mortality rate of 6.2 (95% CI 6.0-6.3) per 100,000 population. The adjusted snakebite mortality rate was 4.4 (95% CI 4.3-4.6) which was significantly higher in the rural areas (4.8, 95% CI 4.7-5.0) and in females (5.5, 95% CI 5.3-5.7). Snakebites accounted for 7.6% of all unintentional injury deaths across all ages but for 33.3% of the deaths in 10-14 years age group. A similar proportion of snakebite deaths occurred while sleeping (30.2%), playing (30.2%) and during field/outdoor activities (27.9%). In these cases, 8.2% people were already dead when found, 34.7% had died before treatment could be provided, and 28 (57.1%) had died post treatment among whom 46.4% had sought treatment at a health facility, 25% with a traditional healer, and the rest from both. Death before reaching a health provider, non-availability of medicines or doctor, referral patterns, and sex-differentials in the context of snakebite deaths are reported. None of the verbatim specifically mentioned anti-venom being used for treatment. The adjusted mortality rate for scorpion sting was 0.9 (95% CI 0.8-0.9).
CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this large representative sample documents the magnitude of snakebite mortality in Bihar and highlight the circumstances surrounding the snakebite events that could facilitate prevention and intervention opportunities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29879197      PMCID: PMC5991745          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198900

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Animal bites contribute significantly to morbidity and mortality in children and adults in certain parts of the world, with bites arising from snakes, dogs, cats, and monkeys being the important contributors.[1] Globally, anywhere between 4 to 18 million people are bitten by snakes and 20,000 to 94,000 people die every year with the majority of them in Africa, South-East Asia, and South Asia.[2-4] The wide variations in these estimates are due to scarcity of reliable population-based studies of incidence and mortality.[2-4] Given the extent of the burden of snake bite related mortality and morbidity, the World Health Organization (WHO) recently re-recognised snake bites under the neglected tropical diseases.[5, 6] India accounts for the highest number of snakebites and related mortality globally.[2] With an age-standardised snakebite mortality rate of 4.1 per 100,000 persons based on a large population-based national survey done nearly 15 years ago, India was estimated to have 46,000 snakebite deaths annually.[7] Three states including Bihar were reported to have the highest annual snakebite deaths.[7] Much of the published literature from India is hospital-based and deals with clinical management of snakebite cases,[8-16] and little information is available around the context around and post snakebite that could facilitate development of successful strategies to address this public health problem.[17] Using a cluster sampling frame,[18, 19] we conducted a population-based study in Bihar state to estimate the causes of death using verbal autopsy (VA) across all age groups. Bihar state with a population of over 100 million is the third most populous state in India with 11% of it being urban.[20] We report epidemiology of mortality due to bite or sting of a venomous animal for all ages based on VA, and highlight in detail the circumstances surrounding the snakebite events that could facilitate prevention and intervention opportunities.

Materials and methods

The parent study on causes of death was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of the Public Health Foundation of India. All participants provided written informed consent; for those who could not read or write the participant information sheet and consent form were explained by the trained interviewer and a thumb impression obtained. The sampling method is described in detail elsewhere,[18, 19, 21] and the methods relevant to this report are detailed here. The state of Bihar is divided into 38 districts each of which is divided into 5–27 blocks giving a total of 342 blocks in the state. Within these 342 blocks, the secondary samplings units (SSUs) were villages in rural areas and urban frame survey blocks in urban areas as defined by the National Sample Survey Organization.[22, 23] The SSUs with <50 households were combined with an adjacent SSU, and the large rural SSUs were split into equal sized segments of 100 households using natural boundaries. A total of 1,017 SSUs were sampled in proportion to the number of SSUs in each block, using simple random sampling without replacement. Therefore, this multi-stage stratified random sampling approach to obtain a representative sample of 772 rural and 245 urban clusters provided a total of 1,017 clusters of about 75–150 households across all the 38 districts of the state of Bihar. This study was conducted from July 2014 to July 2015. In each sampled SSU, all the households (a household was defined as people eating from the same kitchen) were enumerated. During the enumeration, trained interviewers documented the age and sex of all the usual residents in each household of the sampled clusters. Details of members who had in/out-migrated, births, deaths between January 2012 and March 2014 were collected in order to ensure that the denominator included only the usual residents. After documenting the sociodemographic characteristics of the participant, verbal autopsy interviews were conducted for all deaths using the Population Health Metrics Research Consortium (PHMRC) shortened verbal autopsy questionnaires.[24, 25] The respondent for the interview was that household member ≥18 years of age who was most aware of the context of death. A direct question was asked to document if the deceased had suffered an injury/accident that led to the death. Deaths due to bite or sting of a venomous animal were documented under unintentional injury deaths. The animal responsible for bite or sting that resulted in death was documented followed by questions on whether treatment was sought for this bite/sting and if a death certificate for this death was obtained. Following these questions, the respondent was asked to describe the context around the time of bite/sting and death in his/her own words with no prompts from the interviewer as an open verbatim. The PHMRC questionnaire was translated into Hindi (local language), after which it was back-translated into English to ensure the accurate and relevant meaning and intent of the questions. Pilot testing of the questionnaire was carried out and modifications made as necessary. Interview was conducted using the MS-Access and Open Development Kit software in hand-held tablets. The cause of death was assigned using the validated SmartVA automated algorithm.[26-28] The SmartVA was run on all deaths identified in this population and those due to bite or sting of a venomous animal identified using this run were used in this analysis. We report the annualized incidence estimate of mortality due to venomous animal bite/sting for the state of Bihar using two years data from January 2012 to December 2013 for which population denominator was available. The mortality estimates were adjusted for age, sex and urban-rural distribution of population of Bihar as relevant, and are reported for 100,000 population per year. 95% confidence interval (CI) are reported for all estimates, which was calculated using the formula p ± 1.96 X square root of [p(p-1)/n]; where p is the estimated age-sex rural/urban adjusted rate, n is the number of persons and 1.96 is the approximate value of the 97.5 percentile point of the normal distribution.[29] We also present the distribution of mortality due to venomous animal bite/sting in this population within the unintentional injury mortality, which included road traffic injuries, falls, drowning, fire, and poisoning. We utilised all cases of venomous animal bites/stings documented from 1 January 2012 to 31 March 2014 for descriptive data analysis. We report on the seasonal trends of venomous animal bite/sting deaths based on the reported date of injury, and the seasons were categorised for Bihar state as per the Indian meteorological department.[30] With snakebites accounting for the largest mortality among these deaths in this population, we present detailed descriptive data for these deaths using the open verbatim with the aim to report the context of snakebite and the patterns that could facilitate understanding of missed opportunities that could guide reduction of mortality due to snakebites. Three team members (AK, SG and MA) reviewed the open verbatim and noted the variety of information available from these reviews including the whether the snake was seen by deceased or someone else, activity the deceased was engaged in at the time of snakebite, what was done immediately after the snakebite, type of treatment received and referral, if any. All cases were reviewed with RD, and modifications made as needed based on re-review of verbatim. We also present case reports across the major themes identified in snakebites to highlight action areas that need attention. Chi-square test is reported where relevant to assess significant associations. Other than SmartVA, the rest of the analysis were performed using STATA 13.0 software (Stata Corp, USA).

Results

A total of 69 deaths due to bite or sting of a venomous animal were identified from January 2012 to March 2014 (67 deaths in 2012–13) from 109,689 households (87.1% participated, 12.1% door locked, 0.6% migration, and 0.2% other reasons for non-participation) covering 627,658 population of all ages. Verbal autopsy interviews were available for all 69 deaths.

Mortality due to venomous animal bite

The overall adjusted annualised mortality rate due to bite/sting of a venomous animal for all ages was 6.2 (95% CI 6.0–6.3) per 100,000 population, with it being higher in the rural areas than in urban areas (Table 1). The adjusted mortality rate was significantly higher for females (6.9%, 95% CI 6.7–7.2) than for males (5.5%, 95% CI 5.3–5.7) as shown in Table 1. Considering by age, mortality rate was significantly higher in females until 19 years of age than males, but then males had a higher mortality rate in 40–49 years and 60+ years age group (Table 1). Deaths due to bite/sting of a venomous animal accounted for 10.7% of all deaths due to unintentional injuries in this population (Fig 1). It accounted for a significant proportion of unintentional injury deaths in the age groups of 10–14 years (38.9%), 0–4 years (23.5%) and 5–9 years (21.2%). The mean (median) age for mortality due to bite of a venomous animal was 26.7 (20), 15.7 (11), and 20.8 (12) years for males, females, and both sexes combined, respectively. Data on type of animal was available for 65 (94.2%) deaths. Bite by snakes accounted for the majority (49, 71%) followed by scorpion sting (11, 15.9%) and other animal bite including dog and unknown animal (9, 13.1%).
Table 1

Annualised adjusted mortality rate due to venomous animal bite/sting based on verbal autopsy interviews for all ages in the Indian state of Bihar.

CI denotes confidence interval. Data on type of animal not available for 4 cases.

VariableCategorySampleAdjusted mortality rate per 100,000 persons due to venomous animal bite/sting (95% CI)
MaleFemaleMaleFemaleBoth
Age group (years)0–445,24742,3355.3 (4.7–5.8)*7.8 (7.2–8.5)*6.5 (6.1–7.0)*
5–941,66638,8787.4 (6.8–8.0)*11.9 (11.1–12.7)*9.6 (9.1–10.1)*
10–1439,30437,5946.6 (6.1–7.2)*16.2 (15.2–17.2)*11.2 (10.6–11.7)*
15–1931,57328,1782.6 (2.2–3.1)*10.2 (9.2–11.1)*6.0 (5.5–6.4)*
20–2951,06953,4962.0 (1.7–2.4)*1.9 (1.5–2.2)*1.9 (1.7–2.2)*
30–3939,37636,0984.5 (4.0–5.0)*3.7 (3.2–4.1)*4.1 (3.8–4.4)*
40–4925,78822,2245.1 (4.5–5.8)*02.7 (2.4–3.0)*
50–5918,98219,6632.8 (2.2–3.4)*2.5 (1.9–3.0)*2.6 (2.2–3.0)*
60+21,37017,66814.5 (13.4–15.7)*3.9 (3.2–4.5)*9.6 (8.9–10.3)*
Place of residenceUrban72,48066,7062.0 (1.7–2.4)1.5 (1.2–1.8)1.8 (1.5–2.0)
Rural241,892229,4265.9 (5.7–6.1)7.6 (7.4–7.9)6.7 (6.6–6.9)
OverallAll ages314,371296,1325.5 (5.3–5.7)*6.9 (6.7–7.2)*6.2 (6.0–6.3)*

*Urban-rural adjusted;

†Sex-adjusted;

‡Age-adjusted

Fig 1

The proportion of deaths due to bite/sting of a venomous animal among the unintentional injury deaths by age group in the Indian state of Bihar using verbal autopsy interviews.

Animals other than snake include scorpion, dogs and unknown animal.

The proportion of deaths due to bite/sting of a venomous animal among the unintentional injury deaths by age group in the Indian state of Bihar using verbal autopsy interviews.

Animals other than snake include scorpion, dogs and unknown animal.

Annualised adjusted mortality rate due to venomous animal bite/sting based on verbal autopsy interviews for all ages in the Indian state of Bihar.

CI denotes confidence interval. Data on type of animal not available for 4 cases. *Urban-rural adjusted; †Sex-adjusted; ‡Age-adjusted

Snakebites

The overall adjusted annualised snakebite mortality rate was 4.4 (95% CI 4.3–4.6) which was significantly higher in the rural areas (4.8, 95% CI 4.7–5.0) and in females (5.5, 95% CI 5.3–5.7) as shown in Table 2. Though snakebites accounted for 7.6% of all unintentional injury deaths across all ages, however, these accounted for 33.3% of the deaths in 10–14 years age group (Fig 1) with the highest adjusted mortality rate (9.5, 95% CI 9.0–10.1) as shown in Table 2. Age group ≥60 years had the next highest snakebite mortality rate. Considering seasonality of these deaths, snakebite deaths accounted for the most deaths in all seasons except in winter (14.3%, Fig 2).
Table 2

Adjusted mortality rate due to venomous animal bite/sting by the type of animal based on verbal autopsy interviews in the Indian state of Bihar.

CI denotes confidence interval.

VariableCategoryAdjusted mortality rate per 100,000 persons (95% CI)
SnakebiteN = 47Scorpion stingN = 11Other animal biteN = 9
Age group (years)*0–43.3 (3.0–3.6)3.2 (2.9–3.6)0
5–95.4 (5.0–5.8)2.6 (2.4–2.9)1.6 (1.4–1.8)
10–149.5 (9.0–10.1)01.6 (1.4–1.8)
15–195.2 (4.7–5.6)0.8 (0.6–1.0)0
20–291.0 (0.8–1.1)00.5 (0.4–0.6)
30–393.2 (2.9–3.5)00
40–491.5 (1.3–1.8)00
50–593.0 (2.5–3.4)02.6 (2.2–3.0)
> = 608.3 (7.6–8.9)03.1 (2.7–3.5)
Sex*Male3.4 (3.3–3.6)0.7 (0.7–0.8)1.2 (1.1–1.3)
Female5.5 (5.3–5.7)1.0 (0.9–1.1)0.6 (0.5–0.7)
Place of residenceUrban1.4 (1.2–1.6)0.4 (0.3–0.5)0
Rural4.8 (4.7–5.0)0.9 (0.9–1.0)1.0 (1.0–1.1)
Overall*4.4 (4.3–4.6)0.9 (0.8–0.9)0.9 (0.9–1.0)

*Urban-rural adjusted;

†Sex-adjusted;

‡Age-adjusted

Fig 2

The distribution of deaths due to venomous animal bite/sting by seasonality in the Indian state of Bihar using verbal autopsy interviews.

Adjusted mortality rate due to venomous animal bite/sting by the type of animal based on verbal autopsy interviews in the Indian state of Bihar.

CI denotes confidence interval. *Urban-rural adjusted; †Sex-adjusted; ‡Age-adjusted Distribution of select characteristics for snakebite deaths based on verbal autopsy interviews by sex are summarised in Table 3. Nearly a similar proportion of snakebite deaths occurred while sleeping (30.2%), playing (30.2%) and during field/outdoor activities (27.9%); females had a higher proportion of snakebites but not statistically significant while sleeping than males (p = 0.925). In 41 (83.7%) of the 49 cases, the snake was seen. In the 8 cases where snake was not seen, doctor informed of the snakebite post medical check-up in 3 cases, fang marks were reported in 1 case, animal bite was mentioned by the deceased to VA respondent in 3 cases, and froth around the mouth and change of skin colour of the deceased to blue or pale was used by the villagers to attribute death to snakebite in 1 case. In these 8 cases, frothing around the mouth was reported in 7 cases and change of skin colour of the deceased in 5 cases. Four (8.2%) people, all females, were already dead when found (Table 3), and the verbatim suggested that snakebite was identified as cause of death based on the froth and/or change in skin colour (Box 1). Seventeen (34.7%) people had died before they could be given any kind of treatment (Table 3). The verbatim of all 17 cases clearly documented that either the deceased died while being taken for treatment or while waiting for the treatment provider to reach the deceased. The case reports in Box 2 also highlight the death occurring between the referral from one provider to another. Overall, 18 (64.3%) of females had died without treatment as compared with 3 (14.3%) of males (p<0.001).
Table 3

Distribution of select characteristics for snakebite deaths based on verbal autopsy interviews in the Indian state of Bihar.

Both(% of N)Male(% of N)Female(% of N)
All snake bitesN = 49N = 21N = 28
Activity at the time of snakebite*
Sleeping13 (30.2)3 (17.7)8 (30.8)
Playing13 (30.2)5 (29.4)10 (38.5)
Field/outdoor activities12 (27.9)8 (47.1)4 (15.4)
Other activities5 (11.6)1 (5.9)4 (15.4)
Snake seen either by the deceased or someone else
Yes41 (83.7)18 (85.7)23 (82.1)
No8 (16.3)3 (14.3)5 (17.9)
Scenario post snakebite§
Person was already dead when found4 (8.2)-4 (14.3)
Person died before treatment could be given17 (34.7)3 (14.3)14 (50)
Person died post treatment28 (57.1)18 (85.7)10 (35.7)
Snakebites with treatmentN = 28N = 18N = 10
Place of treatment post snakebite
Health facility only13 (46.4)10 (55.6)3 (30)
Traditional healer only7 (25)3 (16.7)4 (40)
Health facility and traditional healer8 (28.6)5 (27.8)3 (30)
Referral for treatment
Yes6 (21.4)5 (27.8)1 (10)
No22 (78.6)13 (72.2)9 (90)

*Data missing for 6 cases

†Includes household chores and open defecation

‡Chi-square p-value >0.005 for difference by sex

§Chi-square p-value = 0.002 for difference by sex

Box 1. Case reports highlighting the fatal snakebite cases which were found dead by others based on verbal autopsy interviews in the Indian state of Bihar.

Case report 1: 14 years/girl, Respondent: Brother Brother of the deceased told that his sister had slept at night after dinner. After sometime, someone went to check on her but she was found dead. Her whole body had turned pale and froth was coming from her mouth. Because of the froth, they came to know that a snake had bitten her. Case report 2: 18 years/girl, Respondent: Mother-in law Respondent told that her daughter-in law was healthy before death. At night, she had prepared and fed food to the family and then slept. When she didn’t wake up in the morning, mother-in law went to wake her up. She saw her mouth was covered with froth and her body was cold to touch and turned pale in colour. The daughter-in-law had already died. Men from the village saw the body and told that snake must have bitten her daughter-in-law.

Box 2. Case reports highlighting the context of fatal snakebites when the deceased died before treatment could be given based on verbal autopsy interviews in the Indian state of Bihar.

Case report 1: 7 months/girl, Respondent: Mother Respondent told that her baby was playing in the courtyard around 5 o’clock in the evening when a poisonous snake bit her. Baby was immediately taken to community health centre in Gedawadi but the doctor there told that the baby cannot be treated there. Then, she was taken to Purnia Sadar Hospital, she but died on route to the hospital. Case report 2: 4 years/girl, Respondent: Father Girl went to a nearby garden to play and wandered into the forest to hide during the play. When she was sitting in the forest, she was bitten by a snake. She went back to other children crying and told them that she was bitten by a snake but they did not believe her and said that she had gotten the cut from wood. The girl went to her mother who suggested to call jhaadphook (traditional healer). Her father went to call jhaadphook but in the meantime the girl had died. Case report 3: 12 years/girl, Respondent: Father According to the father of the deceased, the child was grazing an animal in the field. She fell unconscious after a while because of bite of a poisonous animal. Froth was coming from her mouth. They took her home and tried to wake her up after which she vomited twice. Then, a jhaadphook (traditional healer) from nearby were called for help but he suggested to take her outside of the village for treatment. Froth was still coming from her mouth, and she died on–route while we were taking her for treatment. *Data missing for 6 cases †Includes household chores and open defecation ‡Chi-square p-value >0.005 for difference by sex §Chi-square p-value = 0.002 for difference by sex Twenty eight (57.1%) people had died post treatment, of which 46.4% had sought treatment at a health facility, 25% with a traditional healer, and the rest from both (Table 3). Though not statistically significant, females were more likely to be seen only by a traditional healer (40%) as compared with males (16.7%, p = 0.172). Six (21.4%) of the 28 cases were referred from one provider to the other. The case reports documented in Box 3 highlight context around the deaths post treatment, including referral and delay in treatment due to non-availability of medicines or doctor. None of the 49 verbatim specifically mention anti-venom being used for treatment; oxygen support for ventilation was mentioned in 2 cases.

Box 3. Case reports highlighting the context of fatal snakebites when the deceased was given treatment based on verbal autopsy interviews in the Indian state of Bihar.

Case report 1: 60 years/female, Respondent: Husband Respondent told that on the day of death the deceased was sweeping their courtyard. She stepped on a poisonous snake which bit her. She told the family members that a snake had bitten her and she was immediately taken to a jhaadphook (traditional healer) in the village. The healer gave treatment but told that it was difficult for her to survive and within 30 minutes she died. Case report 2: 45 years/male, Respondent: Wife Respondent narrated the incident that the deceased was cutting leaves of a tree. To cut another branch of that tree, he rested one leg on the wall and the other leg on a brick which was lying below. While stepping down on that brick, a snake bit him. Immediately after the bite his foot was tightly tied and blood was expelled out from the area where snake had bitten. He was taken to Sandhya clinic on a motorcycle where he was admitted. The doctor told that his condition was critical and gave some medicine and saline drip. But there was no improvement in his condition and he died. Case report 3: 25 years/male, Respondent: Sister-in law According to the respondent the deceased was having a conversation with some people when a snake bit him. He was immediately taken to a jhaadphook (traditional healer) but his condition didn’t improve. He was then taken to a hospital opposite the jhaadphook’s place. Because medicines were not available in that hospital, he was taken to another hospital but there doctor was not available. So, he was being taken to Gaya for treatment, on-route froth started coming from his mouth and his entire body started to turn light black in colour. The area of bite was full of blood and he then died. Case report 4: 65 years/male, Respondent: Wife According to wife of the deceased, her husband was tying a bundle of wheat when suddenly a snake bit him. Three people were working with him at that time. They took him to a hospital and drip was given but he was not recovering. His condition was getting worse, so the doctor in this hospital took him to another doctor. But the doctor in that hospital said that he cannot look into this case and he asked him to take the deceased to another hospital. Soon after, froth started coming from his mouth and the finger where the snake had bitten him turned black. He then died.

Scorpion sting and other animal bites

The overall adjusted annualised scorpion sting and other animal bite mortality rate was 0.9 (95% CI 0.8–0.9) and 0.9 (95% CI 0.9–1.0), respectively (Table 2). The mortality rate with scorpion sting was higher in 0–9 years age group whereas that with the other animal bite was higher in the ≥50 years age group. Half of the scorpion stings occurred while playing, 33.3% while sleeping and the rest while doing other activities. Seven (63.6%) of scorpion sting cases were taken to a health facility and 36.4% cases were taken to a traditional healer immediately post the sting.

Discussion

The findings from this large representative sample highlights the significant burden of mortality due to snakebites in rural areas, females, and younger ages in the Indian state of Bihar. To our knowledge, these are the first descriptive contextual data from India at population-level that can provide a starting point for possible action and for further in-depth investigations of snakebite mortality. There was a call to prioritise the snakebite control programme in India following the documentation of the burden of snakebite mortality nationally over 15 years ago.[7] The snakebite mortality rate in our study is similar to that reported for Bihar state over a decade ago,[7] thus suggesting that not much has changed over this period. This unfortunately is true globally as well. Undermining snakebite’s public health importance due to its removal from the neglected tropical disease list by the WHO in year 2013 coupled with anti-venom shortage made it difficult to be dealt with.[5, 6] With snakebite’s reinstatement in the neglected tropical disease list in 2017 and initiation of development of comprehensive snakebite control strategy,[31] there is likely to be an impetus to snakebite prevention and treatment access initiatives.[5] Every year, an estimated 2.8 million people are bitten by snakes in India which makes it imperative for India to prioritise the snakebite control programme on an urgent basis.[3] Calls for including snakebite deaths into the notifiable deaths category in India have gained momentum recently to bring an urgency in managing this public health concern.[32] Globally, snakebites affect people in rural areas disproportionately.[3, 4, 31, 33] In this study also, snakebite mortality was nearly 3.5 times higher in the rural than in urban areas of the state. Several reasons for a higher rural mortality have been reported such as poorly constructed housing, agricultural work, treatment seeking from traditional healers, and limited access to antivenom.[6] Availability and accessibility of antivenoms is known to be limited in sub-Saharan Africa and Asia,[17, 34, 35] which results in a vicious cycle of poor supply resulting in higher prices which are a deterrent for medical treatment for rural populations, and a lower confidence in the public health sector’s ability to provide effective and safe antivenoms.[6, 36] While considering the treatment seeking behaviour in our study population among those who had died post treatment, only 25% of the deceased were taken to a traditional healer, 46% visited health facility, and 28.6% had sought services both from a health facility and a traditional healer. This distribution possibly reflects less dependence on traditional healers in the studied population. The cases where dual use was documented highlight the non-availability of treatment or non-response to the treatment for considering treatment services from both health facility and a traditional healer. In a recent assessment of treatment seeking behaviour post non-fatal snakebite in Sri Lanka,[37] geographic variation in type of heath care provider sought was noted with allopathic treatment mainly determined by the presence of probable envenoming. Variations in treatment seeking behaviour are seen with traditional healers preferred in Kenya and South Africa,[38, 39] whereas allopathic treatment preferred in Costa Rica.[40] Such data on treatment seeking behaviour for snakebite at population level are not readily available for India. Furthermore, a little over one-third of the snakebite cases in our study population died before they could be provided with any form of treatment, which is similar to that reported from remote areas of Asia and Africa.[33, 41] Two reasons for delay in access to treatment were noted in the open verbatim in our study. First was the delay in knowledge about a snake having bitten the victim to the family members which resulted in delay in accessing treatment. Second was the delay because of refusal/inability of the first point of contact for treatment to provide appropriate treatment. Unfortunately, not even one verbatim categorically mentioned the use of anti-venom in treatment for any deceased. All these findings point to the urgent need of generating data that can facilitate understanding of how people decide where to seek treatment post snakebite and the treatment provided per se in order to better understand how to address access to the appropriate treatment in India.[42] Inclusion of snakebite deaths into the notifiable deaths category will allow for an immediate understanding of treatment related issues that need attention for snakebites.[32] Though there was no significant difference in snakebite mortality by sex nationally in the study over 15 years ago, however, female deaths had exceeded male deaths in 4 states including in Bihar.[7] In our study also, female mortality due to snakebites was 62% higher than that in males. The burden of snakebite mortality was the highest for females in the younger ages, and for males in the older ages. Females in our study were significantly more likely to have died without treatment (both found dead and died before treatment could be given) than males. A higher proportion of snakebites in females while sleeping possibly indicates that they are more likely to sleep on the floor as compared with males who possibly sleep on a bed in rural areas, thereby, increasing exposure to snakebite for females. A common snake in India, the common Krait, bites indoors during night mostly while the victim is asleep who does not wake up at the time of bite because the bite is painless.[43, 44] Sleeping on a bed off the floor in addition to awareness with effective health education and clearing of vegetation have been reported effective in preventing Krait bites.[45] Interestingly, sleeping under a mosquito net, rather than off the floor on a bed, has previously been reported to be protective of snakebite in Nepal.[46] These are simple preventive measures which could be considered in the Indian setting as well to prevent snakebites. Furthermore, with India’s obsession with boy child it is also likely that a girl child is left to play relatively more unsupervised than a boy child, thereby, increasing exposure to mishaps including snakebite. Our contextual data provides pointers to a sex-differential pattern in the snakebite mortality which needs to be understood further within the socio-cultural context of Indian females to prevent and to treat snakebites in females.[47, 48] For many decades, the "Big 4" snake species have been responsible for Indian snakebite mortality—the common cobra, the common krait, the Russell's viper, and the saw-scaled viper, and there is now the emergence of the hump-nosed pit viper.[49] A recent review highlighted the north-south divide in the snakebite profile in India with neurotoxic envenomations significantly higher in North India compared to South India where hematotoxic envenomations are prevalent.[43] Early morning neuroparalysis caused by common Krait was reported to be a common problem in North India leading to high mortality after snakebite in this review.[43] Documentation of type of snake was beyond the scope of our study, however, the suggestion of less duration between the snakebite and death possibly points to bites by significantly poisonous snakes. Furthermore, with medically important snake species other than the Big 4 being frequently reported from various parts of India,[43] and reports of snakebites being unresponsive to the available polyvalent anti-snake venom which is produced from snakes found in south India,[43, 50] it is imperative that regional variability and snake species other than the Big 4 are also taken into account in the National Snakebite Management Protocol by the government of India and by the WHO South East Asia regional office to prevent this unnecessary mortality.[51, 52] We found a lower mortality due to bite/sting of other venomous animals as compared with snakes in this population, and most of it was accounted for by scorpion sting. Scorpion envenomation is an important public health hazard in tropical and sub-tropical regions, including India.[53] Annual global number of scorpion stings exceeds 1.2 million, with a higher mortality in children than in adults though adults get more bites.[54] A higher mortality in rural areas following scorpion stings is documented due to lack of access to medical facilities or lack of advances in the treatment of scorpion sting.[53] In the national mortality survey over 15 years ago, the rabies mortality rate was estimated at 1.1 deaths per 100,000 population and Bihar state was among the states with higher mortality rate.[55] Deaths documented over a two-year period from a large representative well-defined population sample of Bihar, and details of antecedent events and risk factors are the major strengths of this study. Some limitations of these data need to be kept in mind. As this study was designed to capture all causes of death and not specifically the context or risk factors for snakebites per se, we have used the information available from the open verbatim to present antecedent events and risk factors. Some of this information maybe subjective to recall bias. However, we believe that the information provided is a useful for action and for further in-depth investigations. Attribution of deaths to snakebite in 3 cases based on history of animal bite coupled with frothing around the mouth and skin colour change of the deceased could also be considered as a limitation. However, given that these signs are quite distinctive for a snakebite,[7, 43, 44, 56] and with a history of animal bite, we believe this attribution to be reasonable. Only in 1 case, this attribution was based on only signs. Also, a reasonably high sensitivity and specificity of verbal autopsy for the snakebite deaths has been documented previously.[7] On the other hand, it is likely that we may have underestimated snakebites in which snake was not seen, particularly when the bite occurred while sleeping at night. The bites by the common Krait, a common snake in India, which mostly bites at night while the victim is asleep,[43, 44] could be missed until the victim reaches a competent doctor who has knowledge of the early morning neuroparalysis caused by common Krait bite.[9, 49] In conclusion, these data facilitate increasing the visibility of snakebite mortality by addressing many of the gaps in magnitude and risk factors for it in India. These findings also contribute to knowledge around the way forward in the global strategy to combat snake envenoming.[4] Immediate preventive measures such as use of beds and mosquito net can be undertaken immediately by the government to reduce the incidence of snakebite while sleeping. Population level documentation of the incidence of snakebite is needed to fully comprehend the burden of snakebites and treatment seeking behaviour,[37, 57] in addition to mortality to formulate evidence based strategies to address the disproportionate burden of snake envenoming in rural areas and in females in the Indian state of Bihar.

STROBE Checklist.

(DOC) Click here for additional data file.
  45 in total

1.  Snake bites in Moyen Chari district, Chad: a five-year experience.

Authors:  Enrico Rino Bregani; Tommaso Maraffi; Tu Van Tien
Journal:  Trop Doct       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 0.731

2.  Management of snake-bite in rural Maharashtra: a 10-year experience.

Authors:  D P Punde
Journal:  Natl Med J India       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 0.537

3.  Distinctive epidemiologic and clinical features of common krait (Bungarus caeruleus) bites in Sri Lanka.

Authors:  Christeine A Ariaratnam; M H Rezvi Sheriff; R David G Theakston; David A Warrell
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.345

4.  Consequences of neglect: analysis of the sub-Saharan African snake antivenom market and the global context.

Authors:  Nicholas I Brown
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2012-06-05

Review 5.  New approaches & technologies of venomics to meet the challenge of human envenoming by snakebites in India.

Authors:  David A Warrell; José Maria Gutiérrez; Juan J Calvete; David Williams
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Population Health Metrics Research Consortium gold standard verbal autopsy validation study: design, implementation, and development of analysis datasets.

Authors:  Christopher Jl Murray; Alan D Lopez; Robert Black; Ramesh Ahuja; Said Mohd Ali; Abdullah Baqui; Lalit Dandona; Emily Dantzer; Vinita Das; Usha Dhingra; Arup Dutta; Wafaie Fawzi; Abraham D Flaxman; Sara Gómez; Bernardo Hernández; Rohina Joshi; Henry Kalter; Aarti Kumar; Vishwajeet Kumar; Rafael Lozano; Marilla Lucero; Saurabh Mehta; Bruce Neal; Summer Lockett Ohno; Rajendra Prasad; Devarsetty Praveen; Zul Premji; Dolores Ramírez-Villalobos; Hazel Remolador; Ian Riley; Minerva Romero; Mwanaidi Said; Diozele Sanvictores; Sunil Sazawal; Veronica Tallo
Journal:  Popul Health Metr       Date:  2011-08-04

7.  A retrospective study of use of polyvalent anti-snake venom and risk factors for mortality from snake bite in a tertiary care setting.

Authors:  Shraddha M Pore; Sunita J Ramanand; Praveenkumar T Patil; Alka D Gore; Mayur P Pawar; Smita L Gaidhankar; Ravi R Ghanghas
Journal:  Indian J Pharmacol       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.200

8.  Mass awareness regarding snake bite induced early morning neuroparalysis can prevent many deaths in North India.

Authors:  Rupinder Sharma; Varundeep Dogra; Gurudutt Sharma; Vivek Chauhan
Journal:  Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep

9.  Prevention of krait bites by sleeping above ground: preliminary results from an observational pilot study.

Authors:  Chaturaka Rodrigo; Selvanayagam Kirushanthan; Ariaranee Gnanathasan
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 2.646

10.  The need for full integration of snakebite envenoming within a global strategy to combat the neglected tropical diseases: the way forward.

Authors:  José María Gutiérrez; David A Warrell; David J Williams; Simon Jensen; Nicholas Brown; Juan J Calvete; Robert A Harrison
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2013-06-13
View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Developing Small Molecule Therapeutics for the Initial and Adjunctive Treatment of Snakebite.

Authors:  Tommaso C Bulfone; Stephen P Samuel; Philip E Bickler; Matthew R Lewin
Journal:  J Trop Med       Date:  2018-07-30

2.  ICMR task force project- survey of the incidence, mortality, morbidity and socio-economic burden of snakebite in India: A study protocol.

Authors:  Jaideep C Menon; Omesh K Bharti; Rupinder S Dhaliwal; Denny John; Geetha R Menon; Ashoo Grover; Joy K Chakma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Estimating epidemiological and economic burden and community derived disability weights for snake bite in Kerala: a study protocol.

Authors:  Jaideep C Menon; Denny John; Geeta R Menon; Joseph K Joseph; P Rakesh Suseela; V V Pillay; Amitava Banerjee
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2021-03-01

Review 4.  Perspective on the Therapeutics of Anti-Snake Venom.

Authors:  Isabel Gómez-Betancur; Vedanjali Gogineni; Andrea Salazar-Ospina; Francisco León
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 4.411

5.  Global injury morbidity and mortality from 1990 to 2017: results from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017.

Authors:  Spencer L James; Chris D Castle; Zachary V Dingels; Jack T Fox; Erin B Hamilton; Zichen Liu; Nicholas L S Roberts; Dillon O Sylte; Nathaniel J Henry; Kate E LeGrand; Ahmed Abdelalim; Amir Abdoli; Ibrahim Abdollahpour; Rizwan Suliankatchi Abdulkader; Aidin Abedi; Akine Eshete Abosetugn; Abdelrahman I Abushouk; Oladimeji M Adebayo; Marcela Agudelo-Botero; Tauseef Ahmad; Rushdia Ahmed; Muktar Beshir Ahmed; Miloud Taki Eddine Aichour; Fares Alahdab; Genet Melak Alamene; Fahad Mashhour Alanezi; Animut Alebel; Niguse Meles Alema; Suliman A Alghnam; Samar Al-Hajj; Beriwan Abdulqadir Ali; Saqib Ali; Mahtab Alikhani; Cyrus Alinia; Vahid Alipour; Syed Mohamed Aljunid; Amir Almasi-Hashiani; Nihad A Almasri; Khalid Altirkawi; Yasser Sami Abdeldayem Amer; Saeed Amini; Arianna Maever Loreche Amit; Catalina Liliana Andrei; Alireza Ansari-Moghaddam; Carl Abelardo T Antonio; Seth Christopher Yaw Appiah; Jalal Arabloo; Morteza Arab-Zozani; Zohreh Arefi; Olatunde Aremu; Filippo Ariani; Amit Arora; Malke Asaad; Babak Asghari; Nefsu Awoke; Beatriz Paulina Ayala Quintanilla; Getinet Ayano; Martin Amogre Ayanore; Samad Azari; Ghasem Azarian; Alaa Badawi; Ashish D Badiye; Eleni Bagli; Atif Amin Baig; Mohan Bairwa; Ahad Bakhtiari; Arun Balachandran; Maciej Banach; Srikanta K Banerjee; Palash Chandra Banik; Amrit Banstola; Suzanne Lyn Barker-Collo; Till Winfried Bärnighausen; Lope H Barrero; Akbar Barzegar; Mohsen Bayati; Bayisa Abdissa Baye; Neeraj Bedi; Masoud Behzadifar; Tariku Tesfaye Bekuma; Habte Belete; Corina Benjet; Derrick A Bennett; Isabela M Bensenor; Kidanemaryam Berhe; Pankaj Bhardwaj; Anusha Ganapati Bhat; Krittika Bhattacharyya; Sadia Bibi; Ali Bijani; Muhammad Shahdaat Bin Sayeed; Guilherme Borges; Antonio Maria Borzì; Soufiane Boufous; Alexandra Brazinova; Nikolay Ivanovich Briko; Shyam S Budhathoki; Josip Car; Rosario Cárdenas; Félix Carvalho; João Mauricio Castaldelli-Maia; Carlos A Castañeda-Orjuela; Giulio Castelpietra; Ferrán Catalá-López; Ester Cerin; Joht S Chandan; Wagaye Fentahun Chanie; Soosanna Kumary Chattu; Vijay Kumar Chattu; Irini Chatziralli; Neha Chaudhary; Daniel Youngwhan Cho; Mohiuddin Ahsanul Kabir Chowdhury; Dinh-Toi Chu; Samantha M Colquhoun; Maria-Magdalena Constantin; Vera M Costa; Giovanni Damiani; Ahmad Daryani; Claudio Alberto Dávila-Cervantes; Feleke Mekonnen Demeke; Asmamaw Bizuneh Demis; Gebre Teklemariam Demoz; Desalegn Getnet Demsie; Afshin Derakhshani; Kebede Deribe; Rupak Desai; Mostafa Dianati Nasab; Diana Dias da Silva; Zahra Sadat Dibaji Forooshani; Kerrie E Doyle; Tim Robert Driscoll; Eleonora Dubljanin; Bereket Duko Adema; Arielle Wilder Eagan; Aziz Eftekhari; Elham Ehsani-Chimeh; Maysaa El Sayed Zaki; Demelash Abewa Elemineh; Shaimaa I El-Jaafary; Ziad El-Khatib; Christian Lycke Ellingsen; Mohammad Hassan Emamian; Daniel Adane Endalew; Sharareh Eskandarieh; Pawan Sirwan Faris; Andre Faro; Farshad Farzadfar; Yousef Fatahi; Wubalem Fekadu; Tomas Y Ferede; Seyed-Mohammad Fereshtehnejad; Eduarda Fernandes; Pietro Ferrara; Garumma Tolu Feyissa; Irina Filip; Florian Fischer; Morenike Oluwatoyin Folayan; Masoud Foroutan; Joel Msafiri Francis; Richard Charles Franklin; Takeshi Fukumoto; Biniyam Sahiledengle Geberemariyam; Abadi Kahsu Gebre; Ketema Bizuwork Gebremedhin; Gebreamlak Gebremedhn Gebremeskel; Berhe Gebremichael; Getnet Azeze Gedefaw; Birhanu Geta; Mansour Ghafourifard; Farhad Ghamari; Ahmad Ghashghaee; Asadollah Gholamian; Tiffany K Gill; Alessandra C Goulart; Ayman Grada; Michal Grivna; Mohammed Ibrahim Mohialdeen Gubari; Rafael Alves Guimarães; Yuming Guo; Gaurav Gupta; Juanita A Haagsma; Nima Hafezi-Nejad; Hassan Haghparast Bidgoli; Brian James Hall; Randah R Hamadeh; Samer Hamidi; Josep Maria Haro; Md Mehedi Hasan; Amir Hasanzadeh; Soheil Hassanipour; Hadi Hassankhani; Hamid Yimam Hassen; Rasmus Havmoeller; Khezar Hayat; Delia Hendrie; Fatemeh Heydarpour; Martha Híjar; Hung Chak Ho; Chi Linh Hoang; Michael K Hole; Ramesh Holla; Naznin Hossain; Mehdi Hosseinzadeh; Sorin Hostiuc; Guoqing Hu; Segun Emmanuel Ibitoye; Olayinka Stephen Ilesanmi; Irena Ilic; Milena D Ilic; Leeberk Raja Inbaraj; Endang Indriasih; Seyed Sina Naghibi Irvani; Sheikh Mohammed Shariful Islam; M Mofizul Islam; Rebecca Q Ivers; Kathryn H Jacobsen; Mohammad Ali Jahani; Nader Jahanmehr; Mihajlo Jakovljevic; Farzad Jalilian; Sudha Jayaraman; Achala Upendra Jayatilleke; Ravi Prakash Jha; Yetunde O John-Akinola; Jost B Jonas; Nitin Joseph; Farahnaz Joukar; Jacek Jerzy Jozwiak; Suresh Banayya Jungari; Mikk Jürisson; Ali Kabir; Rajendra Kadel; Amaha Kahsay; Leila R Kalankesh; Rohollah Kalhor; Teshome Abegaz Kamil; Tanuj Kanchan; Neeti Kapoor; Manoochehr Karami; Amir Kasaeian; Hagazi Gebremedhin Kassaye; Taras Kavetskyy; Hafte Kahsay Kebede; Peter Njenga Keiyoro; Abraham Getachew Kelbore; Bayew Kelkay; Yousef Saleh Khader; Morteza Abdullatif Khafaie; Nauman Khalid; Ibrahim A Khalil; Rovshan Khalilov; Mohammad Khammarnia; Ejaz Ahmad Khan; Maseer Khan; Tripti Khanna; Habibolah Khazaie; Fatemeh Khosravi Shadmani; Roba Khundkar; Daniel N Kiirithio; Young-Eun Kim; Daniel Kim; Yun Jin Kim; Adnan Kisa; Sezer Kisa; Hamidreza Komaki; Shivakumar K M Kondlahalli; Vladimir Andreevich Korshunov; Ai Koyanagi; Moritz U G Kraemer; Kewal Krishan; Burcu Kucuk Bicer; Nuworza Kugbey; Vivek Kumar; Nithin Kumar; G Anil Kumar; Manasi Kumar; Girikumar Kumaresh; Om P Kurmi; Oluwatosin Kuti; Carlo La Vecchia; Faris Hasan Lami; Prabhat Lamichhane; Justin J Lang; Van C Lansingh; Dennis Odai Laryea; Savita Lasrado; Arman Latifi; Paolo Lauriola; Janet L Leasher; Shaun Wen Huey Lee; Tsegaye Lolaso Lenjebo; Miriam Levi; Shanshan Li; Shai Linn; Xuefeng Liu; Alan D Lopez; Paulo A Lotufo; Raimundas Lunevicius; Ronan A Lyons; Mohammed Madadin; Muhammed Magdy Abd El Razek; Narayan Bahadur Mahotra; Marek Majdan; Azeem Majeed; Jeadran N Malagon-Rojas; Venkatesh Maled; Reza Malekzadeh; Deborah Carvalho Malta; Navid Manafi; Amir Manafi; Ana-Laura Manda; Narayana Manjunatha; Fariborz Mansour-Ghanaei; Borhan Mansouri; Mohammad Ali Mansournia; Joemer C Maravilla; Lyn M March; Amanda J Mason-Jones; Seyedeh Zahra Masoumi; Benjamin Ballard Massenburg; Pallab K Maulik; Gebrekiros Gebremichael Meles; Addisu Melese; Zeleke Aschalew Melketsedik; Peter T N Memiah; Walter Mendoza; Ritesh G Menezes; Meresa Berwo Mengesha; Melkamu Merid Mengesha; Tuomo J Meretoja; Atte Meretoja; Hayimro Edemealem Merie; Tomislav Mestrovic; Bartosz Miazgowski; Tomasz Miazgowski; Ted R Miller; G K Mini; Andreea Mirica; Erkin M Mirrakhimov; Mehdi Mirzaei-Alavijeh; Prasanna Mithra; Babak Moazen; Masoud Moghadaszadeh; Efat Mohamadi; Yousef Mohammad; Karzan Abdulmuhsin Mohammad; Aso Mohammad Darwesh; Naser Mohammad Gholi Mezerji; Abdollah Mohammadian-Hafshejani; Milad Mohammadoo-Khorasani; Reza Mohammadpourhodki; Shafiu Mohammed; Jemal Abdu Mohammed; Farnam Mohebi; Mariam Molokhia; Lorenzo Monasta; Yoshan Moodley; Mahmood Moosazadeh; Masoud Moradi; Ghobad Moradi; Maziar Moradi-Lakeh; Farhad Moradpour; Lidia Morawska; Ilais Moreno Velásquez; Naho Morisaki; Shane Douglas Morrison; Tilahun Belete Mossie; Atalay Goshu Muluneh; Srinivas Murthy; Kamarul Imran Musa; Ghulam Mustafa; Ashraf F Nabhan; Ahamarshan Jayaraman Nagarajan; Gurudatta Naik; Mukhammad David Naimzada; Farid Najafi; Vinay Nangia; Bruno Ramos Nascimento; Morteza Naserbakht; Vinod Nayak; Duduzile Edith Ndwandwe; Ionut Negoi; Josephine W Ngunjiri; Cuong Tat Nguyen; Huong Lan Thi Nguyen; Rajan Nikbakhsh; Dina Nur Anggraini Ningrum; Chukwudi A Nnaji; Peter S Nyasulu; Felix Akpojene Ogbo; Onome Bright Oghenetega; In-Hwan Oh; Emmanuel Wandera Okunga; Andrew T Olagunju; Tinuke O Olagunju; Ahmed Omar Bali; Obinna E Onwujekwe; Kwaku Oppong Asante; Heather M Orpana; Erika Ota; Nikita Otstavnov; Stanislav S Otstavnov; Mahesh P A; Jagadish Rao Padubidri; Smita Pakhale; Keyvan Pakshir; Songhomitra Panda-Jonas; Eun-Kee Park; Sangram Kishor Patel; Ashish Pathak; Sanghamitra Pati; George C Patton; Kebreab Paulos; Amy E Peden; Veincent Christian Filipino Pepito; Jeevan Pereira; Hai Quang Pham; Michael R Phillips; Marina Pinheiro; Roman V Polibin; Suzanne Polinder; Hossein Poustchi; Swayam Prakash; Dimas Ria Angga Pribadi; Parul Puri; Zahiruddin Quazi Syed; Mohammad Rabiee; Navid Rabiee; Amir Radfar; Anwar Rafay; Ata Rafiee; Alireza Rafiei; Fakher Rahim; Siavash Rahimi; Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar; Muhammad Aziz Rahman; Ali Rajabpour-Sanati; Fatemeh Rajati; Ivo Rakovac; Kavitha Ranganathan; Sowmya J Rao; Vahid Rashedi; Prateek Rastogi; Priya Rathi; Salman Rawaf; Lal Rawal; Reza Rawassizadeh; Vishnu Renjith; Andre M N Renzaho; Serge Resnikoff; Aziz Rezapour; Ana Isabel Ribeiro; Jennifer Rickard; Carlos Miguel Rios González; Luca Ronfani; Gholamreza Roshandel; Anas M Saad; Yogesh Damodar Sabde; Siamak Sabour; Basema Saddik; Saeed Safari; Roya Safari-Faramani; Hamid Safarpour; Mahdi Safdarian; S Mohammad Sajadi; Payman Salamati; Farkhonde Salehi; Saleh Salehi Zahabi; Marwa R Rashad Salem; Hosni Salem; Omar Salman; Inbal Salz; Abdallah M Samy; Juan Sanabria; Lidia Sanchez Riera; Milena M Santric Milicevic; Abdur Razzaque Sarker; Arash Sarveazad; Brijesh Sathian; Monika Sawhney; Susan M Sawyer; Sonia Saxena; Mehdi Sayyah; David C Schwebel; Soraya Seedat; Subramanian Senthilkumaran; Sadaf G Sepanlou; Seyedmojtaba Seyedmousavi; Feng Sha; Faramarz Shaahmadi; Saeed Shahabi; Masood Ali Shaikh; Mehran Shams-Beyranvand; Morteza Shamsizadeh; Mahdi Sharif-Alhoseini; Hamid Sharifi; Aziz Sheikh; Mika Shigematsu; Jae Il Shin; Rahman Shiri; Soraya Siabani; Inga Dora Sigfusdottir; Pankaj Kumar Singh; Jasvinder A Singh; Dhirendra Narain Sinha; Catalin-Gabriel Smarandache; Emma U R Smith; Amin Soheili; Bija Soleymani; Ali Reza Soltanian; Joan B Soriano; Muluken Bekele Sorrie; Ireneous N Soyiri; Dan J Stein; Mark A Stokes; Mu'awiyyah Babale Sufiyan; Hafiz Ansar Rasul Suleria; Bryan L Sykes; Rafael Tabarés-Seisdedos; Karen M Tabb; Biruk Wogayehu Taddele; Degena Bahrey Tadesse; Animut Tagele Tamiru; Ingan Ukur Tarigan; Yonatal Mesfin Tefera; Arash Tehrani-Banihashemi; Merhawi Gebremedhin Tekle; Gebretsadkan Hintsa Tekulu; Ayenew Kassie Tesema; Berhe Etsay Tesfay; Rekha Thapar; Asres Bedaso Tilahune; Kenean Getaneh Tlaye; Hamid Reza Tohidinik; Roman Topor-Madry; Bach Xuan Tran; Khanh Bao Tran; Jaya Prasad Tripathy; Alexander C Tsai; Lorainne Tudor Car; Saif Ullah; Irfan Ullah; Maida Umar; Bhaskaran Unnikrishnan; Era Upadhyay; Olalekan A Uthman; Pascual R Valdez; Tommi Juhani Vasankari; Narayanaswamy Venketasubramanian; Francesco S Violante; Vasily Vlassov; Yasir Waheed; Girmay Teklay Weldesamuel; Andrea Werdecker; Taweewat Wiangkham; Haileab Fekadu Wolde; Dawit Habte Woldeyes; Dawit Zewdu Wondafrash; Temesgen Gebeyehu Wondmeneh; Adam Belay Wondmieneh; Ai-Min Wu; Rajaram Yadav; Ali Yadollahpour; Yuichiro Yano; Sanni Yaya; Vahid Yazdi-Feyzabadi; Paul Yip; Engida Yisma; Naohiro Yonemoto; Seok-Jun Yoon; Yoosik Youm; Mustafa Z Younis; Zabihollah Yousefi; Yong Yu; Chuanhua Yu; Hasan Yusefzadeh; Telma Zahirian Moghadam; Zoubida Zaidi; Sojib Bin Zaman; Mohammad Zamani; Maryam Zamanian; Hamed Zandian; Ahmad Zarei; Fatemeh Zare; Zhi-Jiang Zhang; Yunquan Zhang; Sanjay Zodpey; Lalit Dandona; Rakhi Dandona; Louisa Degenhardt; Samath Dhamminda Dharmaratne; Simon I Hay; Ali H Mokdad; Robert C Reiner; Benn Sartorius; Theo Vos
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 2.399

6.  Ambispective study of clinical picture, management practices and outcome of snake bite patients at tertiary care centre in Northern India.

Authors:  Ranveer Singh Jadon; Rita Sood; Nitesh Kumar Bauddh; Animesh Ray; Manish Soneja; Praveen Agarwal; Naveet Wig
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2021-02-27
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.