Literature DB >> 29879005

Not All Breast Implants Are Equal: A 13-Year Review of Implant Longevity and Reasons for Explantation.

Aaron C Van Slyke1, Michael Carr, Nicholas J Carr.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Augmentation mammaplasty is the most common aesthetic procedure. Textured implants control implant position and have improved capsular contracture rates; however, the impact of texturing on longevity and clinical findings at explantation is unclear.
METHODS: All cases of explantation between January of 2005 and April of 2017 from an aesthetic practice were reviewed retrospectively. Patient demographics, implant characteristics, time to explantation, and clinical presentation and intraoperative findings at explantation were analyzed.
RESULTS: Five hundred thirty-nine breast implants were explanted during the study period: 249 saline, 147 smooth gel, 123 Biocell, and 20 other nonaggressively textured breast implants. Average time from placement to explantation was 7.5, 5.6, 4.9, and 4.0 years for saline, other textured, smooth gel, and Biocell implants, respectively (p = 3.25e-08). The percentage of implants removed associated with implant performance failure was 50.3, 57.4, 75.0, and 85.4 percent for smooth gel, saline, other textured, and Biocell implants, respectively (p = 7.25e-09). In addition, 21.1 percent of Biocell implants versus 1.4 percent of all other implants presented with pain (p = 2.71e-15). Forty-five Biocell implants had double capsules; this phenomenon was not observed with any other implant type (p = 5.85e-37). Seven Biocell implants had late seromas, compared to three late seromas with any other implant type (p = 0.0013).
CONCLUSIONS: Here, the authors provide evidence that Biocell implants have the shortest time to explantation and the highest proportion of implants associated with implant performance failure. This information should complement the informed consent process when selecting an appropriate implant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29879005     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004678

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  7 in total

1.  Implant Replacement or Removal: What Happens after Capsular Contracture? A German Study Examining Breast Implant Revision Surgery and Patient Choices in 946 Cases.

Authors:  Shafreena Kühn; Mara Anna Georgijewitsch; Andrej Wehle; Moritz Billner; Lara Küenzlen; Jens Rothenberger; Ulrich Michael Rieger
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 2.268

Review 2.  The Textured Breast Implant Crisis: A Call for Action.

Authors:  Eric Swanson
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.539

3.  A Rebuttal of the 12 Breast Reconstruction Points to Minimize Implant Contamination.

Authors:  Eric Swanson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-05-17

4.  Plastic Surgeons Defend Textured Breast Implants at 2019 U.S. Food and Drug Administration Hearing: Why It Is Time to Reconsider.

Authors:  Eric Swanson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-08-30

5.  Self-Reported Health Complaints in Women Undergoing Explantation of Breast Implants.

Authors:  Renée M L Miseré; René R W J van der Hulst
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 4.283

Review 6.  Advanced strategies to thwart foreign body response to implantable devices.

Authors:  Simone Capuani; Gulsah Malgir; Corrine Ying Xuan Chua; Alessandro Grattoni
Journal:  Bioeng Transl Med       Date:  2022-03-02

Review 7.  Breast Implant-associated Double Capsules: What Do We Know So Far? A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Serge Zogheib; Cyril Hanna; Bechara Daou; Georges Mjaess; Marwan Nasr
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 2.326

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.