Z Varga1,2, E van der Pol3,4,5, M Pálmai1, R Garcia-Diez6, C Gollwitzer6, M Krumrey6, J-L Fraikin7, A Gasecka3,5,8, N Hajji3, T G van Leeuwen4,5, R Nieuwland3,5. 1. Biological Nanochemistry Research Group, Institute of Materials and Environmental Chemistry, Research Center for Natural Sciences, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary. 2. Department of Biophysics and Radiation Biology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary. 3. Laboratory of Experimental Clinical Chemistry, Academic Medical Center of the University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 4. Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Academic Medical Center of the University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 5. Vesicle Observation Center, Academic Medical Center of the University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 6. Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), Berlin, Germany. 7. Spectradyne LLC, Torrance, CA, USA. 8. 1st Chair and Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Abstract
Essentials Standardization of extracellular vesicle (EV) measurements by flow cytometry needs improvement. Hollow organosilica beads were prepared, characterized, and tested as reference particles. Light scattering properties of hollow beads resemble that of platelet-derived EVs. Hollow beads are ideal reference particles to standardize scatter flow cytometry research on EVs. SUMMARY: Background The concentration of extracellular vesicles (EVs) in body fluids is a promising biomarker for disease, and flow cytometry remains the clinically most applicable method to identify the cellular origin of single EVs in suspension. To compare concentration measurements of EVs between flow cytometers, solid polystyrene reference beads and EVs were distributed in the first ISTH-organized interlaboratory comparison studies. The beads were used to set size gates based on light scatter, and the concentration of EVs was measured within the size gates. However, polystyrene beads lead to false size determination of EVs, owing to the mismatch in refractive index between beads and EVs. Moreover, polystyrene beads gate different EV sizes on different flow cytometers. Objective To prepare, characterize and test hollow organosilica beads (HOBs) as reference beads to set EV size gates in flow cytometry investigations. Methods HOBs were prepared with a hard template sol-gel method, and extensively characterized for morphology, size, and colloidal stability. The applicability of HOBs as reference particles was investigated by flow cytometry with HOBs and platelet-derived EVs. Results HOBs proved to be monodisperse with a homogeneous shell thickness. Two-angle light-scattering measurements by flow cytometry confirmed that HOBs have light-scattering properties similar to those of platelet-derived EVs. Conclusions Because the structure and light-scattering properties HOBs resemble those of EVs, HOBs with a given size will gate EVs of the same size. Therefore, HOBs are ideal reference beads with which to standardize optical measurements of the EV concentration within a predefined size range.
Essentials Standardization of extracellular vesicle (EV) measurements by flow cytometry needs improvement. Hollow organosilica beads were prepared, characterized, and tested as reference particles. Light scattering properties of hollow beads resemble that of platelet-derived EVs. Hollow beads are ideal reference particles to standardize scatter flow cytometry research on EVs. SUMMARY: Background The concentration of extracellular vesicles (EVs) in body fluids is a promising biomarker for disease, and flow cytometry remains the clinically most applicable method to identify the cellular origin of single EVs in suspension. To compare concentration measurements of EVs between flow cytometers, solid polystyrene reference beads and EVs were distributed in the first ISTH-organized interlaboratory comparison studies. The beads were used to set size gates based on light scatter, and the concentration of EVs was measured within the size gates. However, polystyrene beads lead to false size determination of EVs, owing to the mismatch in refractive index between beads and EVs. Moreover, polystyrene beads gate different EV sizes on different flow cytometers. Objective To prepare, characterize and test hollow organosilica beads (HOBs) as reference beads to set EV size gates in flow cytometry investigations. Methods HOBs were prepared with a hard template sol-gel method, and extensively characterized for morphology, size, and colloidal stability. The applicability of HOBs as reference particles was investigated by flow cytometry with HOBs and platelet-derived EVs. Results HOBs proved to be monodisperse with a homogeneous shell thickness. Two-angle light-scattering measurements by flow cytometry confirmed that HOBs have light-scattering properties similar to those of platelet-derived EVs. Conclusions Because the structure and light-scattering properties HOBs resemble those of EVs, HOBs with a given size will gate EVs of the same size. Therefore, HOBs are ideal reference beads with which to standardize optical measurements of the EV concentration within a predefined size range.
Authors: Joshua A Welsh; Peter Horak; James S Wilkinson; Verity J Ford; Jennifer C Jones; David Smith; Judith A Holloway; Nicola A Englyst Journal: Cytometry A Date: 2019-06-28 Impact factor: 4.714
Authors: Mathijs R Wirtz; Jordy Jurgens; Coert J Zuurbier; Joris J T H Roelofs; Philip C Spinella; Jennifer A Muszynski; J Carel Goslings; Nicole P Juffermans Journal: Transfusion Date: 2018-11-21 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Edward Geeurickx; Joeri Tulkens; Bert Dhondt; Jan Van Deun; Lien Lippens; Glenn Vergauwen; Elisa Heyrman; Delphine De Sutter; Kris Gevaert; Francis Impens; Ilkka Miinalainen; Pieter-Jan Van Bockstal; Thomas De Beer; Marca H M Wauben; Esther N M Nolte-'t-Hoen; Katarzyna Bloch; Johannes V Swinnen; Edwin van der Pol; Rienk Nieuwland; Geert Braems; Nico Callewaert; Pieter Mestdagh; Jo Vandesompele; Hannelore Denys; Sven Eyckerman; Olivier De Wever; An Hendrix Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2019-07-23 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Leonie de Rond; Edwin van der Pol; Paul R Bloemen; Tina Van Den Broeck; Ludo Monheim; Rienk Nieuwland; Ton G van Leeuwen; Frank A W Coumans Journal: Cytometry A Date: 2020-02-04 Impact factor: 4.355