Literature DB >> 29876726

Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Reliability and Validity of the Danish Version of the Readiness for Return to Work Instrument.

Christina Malmose Stapelfeldt1,2, Anne-Mette Hedeager Momsen3,4, Thomas Lund5,6, Therese Koops Grønborg7, Sheilah Hogg-Johnson8,9,10, Chris Jensen11,12, Janne Skakon13, Merete Labriola3,4.   

Abstract

The objective of the present study was to translate and validate the Canadian Readiness for Return To Work instrument (RRTW-CA) into a Danish version (RRTWDK) by testing its test-retest and internal consistency reliability and its structural and construct validity. Cross-cultural adaptation of the six-staged RRTW-CA instrument was performed in a standardised, systematic five-step-procedure; forward translation, panel synthesis of the translation, back translation, consolidation and revision by researchers, and finally pre-testing. This RRTW-DK beta-version was tested for its psychometric properties by intra-class correlation coefficient and standard error of measurement (n = 114), Cronbach's alpha (n = 471), confirmatory factor analyses (n = 373), and Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (n = 436) in sickness beneficiaries from a municipal employment agency and hospital wards. The original RRTW-CA stage structure could not be confirmed in the RRTWDK. The psychometric properties were thus inconclusive. The RRTW-DK cannot be recommended for use in the current version as the RRTW construct is questionable. The RRTW construct needs further exploration, preferably in a population that is homogeneous with regard to cause of sickness, disability duration and age.

Keywords:  Rehabilitation; Reproducibility of results; Sick leave; Surveys and questionnaires; Validation studies; Vocational

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 29876726     DOI: 10.1007/s10926-018-9790-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Rehabil        ISSN: 1053-0487


  30 in total

Review 1.  A review of health-related work outcome measures and their uses, and recommended measures.

Authors:  B C Amick; D Lerner; W H Rogers; T Rooney; J N Katz
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 2.  Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures.

Authors:  D E Beaton; C Bombardier; F Guillemin; M B Ferraz
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Interpreting the magnitudes of correlation coefficients.

Authors:  James F Hemphill
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2003-01

Review 4.  Readiness for return to work following injury or illness: conceptualizing the interpersonal impact of health care, workplace, and insurance factors.

Authors:  Renée-Louise Franche; Niklas Krause
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2002-12

5.  In search of how people change. Applications to addictive behaviors.

Authors:  J O Prochaska; C C DiClemente; J C Norcross
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1992-09

Review 6.  Criticisms and concerns of the transtheoretical model in light of recent research.

Authors:  J O Prochaska; C C DiClemente; W F Velicer; J S Rossi
Journal:  Br J Addict       Date:  1992-06

7.  Long term sickness absence.

Authors:  Max Henderson; Nicholas Glozier; Kevin Holland Elliott
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-04-09

8.  Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires.

Authors:  Caroline B Terwee; Sandra D M Bot; Michael R de Boer; Daniëlle A W M van der Windt; Dirk L Knol; Joost Dekker; Lex M Bouter; Henrica C W de Vet
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2006-08-24       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 9.  Determinants of duration of disability and return-to-work after work-related injury and illness: challenges for future research.

Authors:  N Krause; J W Frank; L K Dasinger; T J Sullivan; S J Sinclair
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.214

10.  The Readiness for Return-To-Work (RRTW) scale: development and validation of a self-report staging scale in lost-time claimants with musculoskeletal disorders.

Authors:  Renée-Louise Franche; Marc Corbière; Hyunmi Lee; F Curtis Breslin; C Gail Hepburn
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2007-08-15
View more
  1 in total

1.  The Readiness for Return to Work Scale; Does it Help in Evaluation of Return to Work?

Authors:  Lene Aasdahl; Marius Steiro Fimland; Cecilie Røe
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2021-10-16
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.