Mazen El Rafei1, Sammy Badr1, Guillaume Lefebvre1, Francois Machuron2, Benoist Capon1, Rene-Marc Flipo3, Anne Cotten4. 1. Musculoskeletal Radiology Department, Lille University Hospital, 59037, Lille, France. 2. Unite de methodologie biostatistique et data management Maison regionale de la recherche clinique CHRU Lille, Lille, France. 3. Department of Rheumatology, Lille University Hospital, 59037, Lille, France. 4. Musculoskeletal Radiology Department, Lille University Hospital, 59037, Lille, France. anne.cotten@chru-lille.fr.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To describe the appearance of the anatomical variations of the sacroiliac joints (SIJ) on MR images and to highlight the potential MR features that might be misleading. METHODS: Consecutive MRI examinations of SIJs performed at our department from January 2015 to December 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. As one of our goals was to describe potential misleading edematous or structural changes associated with SIJ anatomical variations, patients fulfilling the ASAS criteria were excluded from this study to ensure that signal intensity changes would not be related to sacroiliitis. Five anatomical variations and a dysmorphic appearance of the SIJ were detected. RESULTS: The final group consisted of 157 patients. Unilateral or bilateral anatomical variations of the SIJ were found in 50 patients (accessory SIJ, iliosacral complex and sacral defect in 17, 18 and 21 patients, respectively, and synostosis in one patient). A dysmorphic appearance of the SIJ was found in 26 patients. No case of an unfused ossification centers was depicted. Structural and/or edematous changes of the facing bones were quite frequently observed in accessory and dysmorphic SIJ. Iliosacral complex and sacral defects could be associated with prominent vessels running along their bony surfaces. CONCLUSION: Several anatomical variations of the SIJs are relatively commonly seen on MR images, particularly in females. These variations may be associated with signal intensity changes, which may be mechanical and not necessarily inflammatory in nature. KEY POINTS: • Anatomical variations of SIJ may involve the cartilaginous or ligamentous part of the joint • Anatomical variations of SIJ are sometimes associated with edematous and/or structural changes of the adjacent bone • Anatomical variations of the SIJ can be misleading on MR imaging.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the appearance of the anatomical variations of the sacroiliac joints (SIJ) on MR images and to highlight the potential MR features that might be misleading. METHODS: Consecutive MRI examinations of SIJs performed at our department from January 2015 to December 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. As one of our goals was to describe potential misleading edematous or structural changes associated with SIJ anatomical variations, patients fulfilling the ASAS criteria were excluded from this study to ensure that signal intensity changes would not be related to sacroiliitis. Five anatomical variations and a dysmorphic appearance of the SIJ were detected. RESULTS: The final group consisted of 157 patients. Unilateral or bilateral anatomical variations of the SIJ were found in 50 patients (accessory SIJ, iliosacral complex and sacral defect in 17, 18 and 21 patients, respectively, and synostosis in one patient). A dysmorphic appearance of the SIJ was found in 26 patients. No case of an unfused ossification centers was depicted. Structural and/or edematous changes of the facing bones were quite frequently observed in accessory and dysmorphic SIJ. Iliosacral complex and sacral defects could be associated with prominent vessels running along their bony surfaces. CONCLUSION: Several anatomical variations of the SIJs are relatively commonly seen on MR images, particularly in females. These variations may be associated with signal intensity changes, which may be mechanical and not necessarily inflammatory in nature. KEY POINTS: • Anatomical variations of SIJ may involve the cartilaginous or ligamentous part of the joint • Anatomical variations of SIJ are sometimes associated with edematous and/or structural changes of the adjacent bone • Anatomical variations of the SIJ can be misleading on MR imaging.
Entities:
Keywords:
Anatomy; Bone marrow edema; Magnetic resonance imaging; Sacroiliac joints; Sacroiliitis
Authors: Robyn M Benz; Thomas Daikeler; Alexander T Mameghani; Giorgio Tamborrini; Ueli Studler Journal: Arthritis Rheumatol Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 10.995
Authors: H Marzo-Ortega; D McGonagle; P O'Connor; E M A Hensor; A N Bennett; M J Green; P Emery Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2008-11-19 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: J Braun; R van den Berg; X Baraliakos; H Boehm; R Burgos-Vargas; E Collantes-Estevez; H Dagfinrud; B Dijkmans; M Dougados; P Emery; P Geher; M Hammoudeh; R D Inman; M Jongkees; M A Khan; U Kiltz; Tk Kvien; M Leirisalo-Repo; W P Maksymowych; I Olivieri; K Pavelka; J Sieper; E Stanislawska-Biernat; D Wendling; S Ozgocmen; C van Drogen; Bj van Royen; D van der Heijde Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Walter P Maksymowych; Stephanie Wichuk; Maxime Dougados; Heather Jones; Annette Szumski; Jack F Bukowski; Lisa Marshall; Robert G Lambert Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2017-06-06 Impact factor: 5.156
Authors: Michael L Francavilla; Suraj D Serai; Timothy G Brandon; David M Biko; Dmitry Khrichenko; Jie C Nguyen; Rui Xiao; Nancy A Chauvin; Liya Gendler; Pamela F Weiss Journal: ACR Open Rheumatol Date: 2021-11-10
Authors: Rosa Marie Kiil; Clara E Mistegaard; Anne Gitte Loft; Anna Zejden; Oliver Hendricks; Anne Grethe Jurik Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2022-03-24 Impact factor: 5.156