Rossana Romani1, George Ryan2, Christian Benner3, Jonathan Pollock2. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, Fulham Palace Rd, London, W6 8RF, UK. romanirossana16@gmail.com. 2. Department of Neurosurgery, Essex Neuroscience Centre, Queen's Hospital, Romford, RM7 0AG, UK. 3. Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Helsinki, 2b, P.O. Box 68, FI-00014, Helsinki, Finland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Improving access to neuroradiology investigations has led to an increased rate of diagnosis of incidental meningiomas. METHOD: A cohort of 136 incidental meningioma patients collected by a single neurosurgeon in a single neurosurgical centre is retrospectively analysed between 2002 and 2016. Demographic data, imaging and clinical features are presented. The radiological factors associated with meningiomas progression are also presented. RESULTS: The mean age at diagnosis was 65 (range, 33-94) years. Univariate analysis showed oedema was most strongly correlated with progression (p = 0.010) followed by hyperintensity in T2-weighted (T2W) MRI (p = 0.029) and in Flair-T2W MRI (p = 0.017). Isointensity in Flair-T2W MRI (0.004) was most strongly correlated with non-progression of the meningioma followed by calcification (p = 0.007), older age (p = 0.087), hypointensity in Flair-T2W MRI (p = 0.014) sequences and in T2W MRI (p = 0.096). In multivariate analysis, the strongest radiological factor predictive of progression was peritumoural oedema (p = 0.016) and that of non-progression was calcification (p = 0.002). At the end of the median follow-up (FU) of 43 (range, 4-150) months, 109 (80%) patients remained clinically stable, 13 (10%) became symptomatic and 14 (10%) showed clinical and radiological progression. CONCLUSIONS: One hundred and nine (80%) patients remained stable at the end of FU. Peritumoural oedema was predictive of meningiomas progression. Further prospective study is needed to identify the combination of factors which can predict the meningioma progression for an early surgery or early discharge.
BACKGROUND: Improving access to neuroradiology investigations has led to an increased rate of diagnosis of incidental meningiomas. METHOD: A cohort of 136 incidental meningiomapatients collected by a single neurosurgeon in a single neurosurgical centre is retrospectively analysed between 2002 and 2016. Demographic data, imaging and clinical features are presented. The radiological factors associated with meningiomas progression are also presented. RESULTS: The mean age at diagnosis was 65 (range, 33-94) years. Univariate analysis showed oedema was most strongly correlated with progression (p = 0.010) followed by hyperintensity in T2-weighted (T2W) MRI (p = 0.029) and in Flair-T2W MRI (p = 0.017). Isointensity in Flair-T2W MRI (0.004) was most strongly correlated with non-progression of the meningioma followed by calcification (p = 0.007), older age (p = 0.087), hypointensity in Flair-T2W MRI (p = 0.014) sequences and in T2W MRI (p = 0.096). In multivariate analysis, the strongest radiological factor predictive of progression was peritumoural oedema (p = 0.016) and that of non-progression was calcification (p = 0.002). At the end of the median follow-up (FU) of 43 (range, 4-150) months, 109 (80%) patients remained clinically stable, 13 (10%) became symptomatic and 14 (10%) showed clinical and radiological progression. CONCLUSIONS: One hundred and nine (80%) patients remained stable at the end of FU. Peritumoural oedema was predictive of meningiomas progression. Further prospective study is needed to identify the combination of factors which can predict the meningioma progression for an early surgery or early discharge.
Authors: Abdurrahman I Islim; Ruwanthi Kolamunnage-Dona; Midhun Mohan; Richard D C Moon; Anna Crofton; Brian J Haylock; Nitika Rathi; Andrew R Brodbelt; Samantha J Mills; Michael D Jenkinson Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2020-02-20 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Jason Sheehan; Stylianos Pikis; Abdurrahman I Islim; Ching-Jen Chen; Adomas Bunevicius; Selcuk Peker; Yavuz Samanci; Ahmed M Nabeel; Wael A Reda; Sameh R Tawadros; Amr M N El-Shehaby; Khaled Abdelkarim; Reem M Emad; Violaine Delabar; David Mathieu; Cheng-Chia Lee; Huai-Che Yang; Roman Liscak; Jaromir Hanuska; Roberto Martinez Alvarez; Dev Patel; Douglas Kondziolka; Nuria Martinez Moreno; Manjul Tripathi; Herwin Speckter; Camilo Albert; Greg N Bowden; Ronald J Benveniste; Lawrence Dade Lunsford; Michael D Jenkinson Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2022-01-05 Impact factor: 13.029
Authors: Abdurrahman I Islim; Christopher P Millward; Rory J Piper; Daniel M Fountain; Shaveta Mehta; Ruwanthi Kolamunnage-Dona; Usama Ali; Shelli Diane Koszdin; Theo Georgious; Samantha J Mills; Andrew R Brodbelt; Ryan K Mathew; Thomas Santarius; Michael D Jenkinson Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-01-18 Impact factor: 2.692