| Literature DB >> 29876441 |
Abstract
The determination of compressive strength is affected by many variables such as the water cement (WC) ratio, the superplasticizer (SP), the aggregate combination, and the binder combination. In this dataset article, 7, 28, and 90-day compressive strength models are derived using statistical analysis. The response surface methodology is used toinvestigate the effect of the parameters: Varying percentages of ash, cement, WC, and SP on hardened properties-compressive strengthat 7,28 and 90 days. Thelevels of independent parameters are determinedbased on preliminary experiments. The experimental values for compressive strengthat 7, 28 and 90 days and modulus of elasticity underdifferent treatment conditions are also discussed and presented.These dataset can effectively be used for modelling and prediction in concrete production settings.Entities:
Keywords: Compressive strength; Day-length; Predictive model; Water cement ratio
Year: 2018 PMID: 29876441 PMCID: PMC5988516 DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.02.008
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Data Brief ISSN: 2352-3409
3days experiment.
| 0 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 20 | 25 | 30 | |
| 30.94 | 12.34 | 14.24 | 17.52 | 23.63 | 26.08 | 30.68 |
7 daysexperiment.
| 0 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 20 | 25 | 30 | |
| 40.60 | 12.77 | 15.35 | 18.67 | 30.32 | 31.80 | 35.78 |
ppp 14 daysexperiment.
| 0 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 20 | 25 | 30 | |
| 52.10 | 14.45 | 17.24 | 20.40 | 34.71 | 36.82 | 46.30 |
Fig. 1Prediction and experimental result (3-days model).
Fig. 2Prediction and experimental result (7-days model).
Fig. 3Prediction and experimental result (14-days model).
Fig. 4Prediction and experimental result (28-days model).
Fig. 5Prediction and experimental result (56-days model).
28 daysexperiment.
| 0 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 20 | 25 | 30 | |
| 40.60 | 15.72 | 17.85 | 22.63 | 38.35 | 48.70 | 55.74 |
56 daysexperiment.
| 0 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 20 | 25 | 30 | |
| 66.80 | 16.35 | 20.36 | 24.56 | 43.80 | 53.79 | 61.32 |
90 daysexperiment.
| 0 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 20 | 25 | 30 | |
| 80.50 | 17.28 | 21.40 | 26.77 | 57.09 | 59.54 | 75.60 |
The experimental and numerical results.
| 7 days | 28days | 90days | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| POFA (%) | Compressive Strength (N/mm2) | Compressive Strength (N/mm2) | Compressive Strength (N/mm2) | |||
| Experimental | Numerical | Experimental | Numerical | Experimental | Numerical | |
| 0 | 40.6 | 40.6 | 59.6 | 59.6 | 80.5 | 80.5 |
| 5 | 12.77 | 12.77 | 15.28 | 15.28 | 17.28 | 17.28 |
| 10 | 15.35 | 15.35 | 19.41 | 19.41 | 21.40 | 21.40 |
| 15 | 18.67 | 18.67 | 22.47 | 22.47000005 | 26.77 | 26.77 |
| 20 | 30.32 | 30.32 | 38.10 | 38.100000020 | 57.09 | 57.09 |
| 25 | 31.8 | 31.800000305 | 41.5 | 41.5100050125 | 59.54 | 59.54000001 |
| 30 | 35.78 | 35.48001000125 | 53.48 | 53.4800100125 | 75.60 | 75.6000000625 |
| Subject area | |
| More specific subject area | |
| Type of data | |
| How data was acquired | |
| Data format | |
| Experimental factors | |
| Experimental features | |
| Data source location | |
| Data accessibility |