| Literature DB >> 29876325 |
Monika Martiniakova1, Anna Sarocka1, Ramona Babosova1, Birgit Grosskopf2, Edyta Kapusta3, Zofia Goc3, Grzegorz Formicki3, Radoslav Omelka4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Alcohol is one of the most commonly consumed neurotoxins by humans. Its negative effect on bone health is known for a long time. However, its impact on qualitative and quantitative 2D characteristics of the compact bone is still unclear. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate in detail the effects of subchronic alcohol exposure on compact and trabecular bone tissues microstructure of laboratory mice using 2D and 3D imaging methods. Ten clinically healthy 12 weeks-old mice (males) were randomly divided into two groups. Animals from experimental group (group E; n = 5) drank a solution composed of 15% ethanol and water (1.7 g 100% ethanol kg-1 b.w. per day) for 8 weeks, while those from control group (group C; n = 5) drank only water.Entities:
Keywords: Alcohol; Compact bone; Mice; Microstructure; Trabecular bone
Year: 2018 PMID: 29876325 PMCID: PMC5968607 DOI: 10.1186/s40709-018-0079-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Biol Res (Thessalon) ISSN: 1790-045X Impact factor: 1.889
Fig. 1a Microstructure of compact bone tissue in mice from group C. 1—Non-vascular bone tissue. 2—primary vascular radial bone tissue. b Microstructure of compact bone tissue in mice from group E. 1—Non-vascular bone tissue, 2—primary vascular radial bone tissue. 3—Resorption lacunae. c Detailed view of pars posterior in mice from group E. 4—Vascular canals of primary osteons. 5—Secondary osteons delimited by the cement line with a central (Haversian) canal
Data of quantitative 2D analysis of compact bone tissue in mice from both groups
| Group | N | Area (μm2) | Perimeter (μm) | Max. diameter (μm) | Min. diameter (μm) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary osteons’ vascular canals | C | 165 | 20.4533 ± 3.41 | 16.06 ± 1.355 | 2.6564 ± 0.296 | 2.402 ± 0.226 |
| E | 149 | 30.1013 ± 6.14 | 19.496 ± 2.033 | 3.2987 ± 0.404 | 2.876 ± 0.362 | |
| t-test | ||||||
| Haversian canals | C | 26 | 22.06 ± 3.42 | 16.73 ± 1.32 | 2.81 ± 0.28 | 2.46 ± 0.27 |
| E | 30 | 22.20 ± 4.86 | 16.65 ± 1.85 | 2.72 ± 0.36 | 2.54 ± 0.30 | |
| t-test | NS | NS | NS | NS | ||
| Secondary osteons | C | 26 | 243.63 ± 37.63 | 55.48 ± 4.47 | 9.38 ± 0.89 | 8.23 ± 0.64 |
| E | 30 | 245.41 ± 48.99 | 55.71 ± 5.64 | 9.54 ± 1.09 | 8.14 ± 0.83 | |
| t-test | NS | NS | NS | NS | ||
N number of measured structures, NS non-significant differences
Data of quantitative 3D analysis of compact bone tissue in mice from both groups
| Group | N | BV/TV (%) | BMD (mg HA cm−3) | BV/TV* (%) | Bs. (mm2) | Ct.Th. (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | 5 | 0.509 ± 0.016 | 577.448 ± 27.439 | 0.958 ± 0.014 | 5.456 ± 1.356 | 0.195 ± 0.014 |
| E | 5 | 0.449 ± 0.022 | 513.406 ± 37.514 | 0.957 ± 0.003 | 4.704 ± 0.753 | 0.175 ± 0.010 |
| t-test | NS | NS | NS | |||
n number of measurements, NS non-significant differences, BV/TV relative bone volume, BMD bone mineral density, BV/TV* relative bone volume without marrow cavity, Bs. bone surface, Ct.Th. cortical bone thickness
Fig. 2a Representative reconstructed 3D image of compact bone in mice from group C. b Representative reconstructed 3D image of compact bone in mice from group E. c Representative reconstructed 3D image of trabecular bone in mice from group C. d Representative reconstructed 3D image of trabecular bone in mice from group E
Data of quantitative 3D analysis of trabecular bone tissue in mice from both groups
| Group | N | BV/TV (%) | Tb.N. (mm−1) | Tb.Th. (mm) | Tb.Sp. (mm) | Bs. (mm2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | 5 | 0.158 ± 0.010 | 4.616 ± 0.034 | 0.047 ± 0.001 | 0.210 ± 0.002 | 20.429 ± 3.516 |
| E | 5 | 0.078 ± 0.006 | 3.919 ± 0.134 | 0.035 ± 0.001 | 0.253 ± 0.011 | 13.417 ± 0.872 |
| t-test | ||||||
n number of measurements, BV/TV relative bone volume, Tb.N. trabecular number, Tb.Th. trabecular thickness, Tb.Sp. trabecular separation, Bs. bone surface