BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy for thymic malignancies is technically challenging due to their close proximity to the heart, lungs, esophagus, and breasts, raising concerns about significant acute and late toxicities from conventional photon radiotherapy. Proton therapy (PT) may reduce the radiation dose to these vital organs, leading to less toxicity. We reviewed the dosimetry and outcomes among patients treated with PT for thymic malignancies at our institution. METHODS: From January 2008 to March 2017, six patients with de novo Masaoka stages II-III thymic malignancies were treated with PT on an IRB-approved outcomes tracking protocol. Patients were evaluated weekly during treatment, then every 3 months for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 more years, and then annually for CTCAE vs. four toxicities and disease recurrence. Comparison intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plans were developed for each patient. Mean doses to the heart, esophagus, bilateral breasts, lungs, and V20 of bilateral lungs were evaluated for the two treatment plans. RESULTS: At last follow-up (median follow-up, 2.6 years), there were two patients with recurrences, including metastatic disease in the patient treated definitively with chemotherapy and PT without surgery and a local-regional recurrence in the lung outside the proton field in one of the post-operative cases. No patients with de novo disease experienced grade ≥3 toxicities after PT. The mean dose to the heart, lung, and esophagus was reduced on average by 36.5%, 33.5%, and 60%, respectively, using PT compared with IMRT (P<0.05 for each dose parameter). CONCLUSIONS: PT achieved superior dose sparing to the heart, lung, and esophagus compared to IMRT for thymic malignancies. Patients treated with PT had few radiation-induced toxicities and similar survival compared to historic proton data.
BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy for thymic malignancies is technically challenging due to their close proximity to the heart, lungs, esophagus, and breasts, raising concerns about significant acute and late toxicities from conventional photon radiotherapy. Proton therapy (PT) may reduce the radiation dose to these vital organs, leading to less toxicity. We reviewed the dosimetry and outcomes among patients treated with PT for thymic malignancies at our institution. METHODS: From January 2008 to March 2017, six patients with de novo Masaoka stages II-III thymic malignancies were treated with PT on an IRB-approved outcomes tracking protocol. Patients were evaluated weekly during treatment, then every 3 months for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 more years, and then annually for CTCAE vs. four toxicities and disease recurrence. Comparison intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plans were developed for each patient. Mean doses to the heart, esophagus, bilateral breasts, lungs, and V20 of bilateral lungs were evaluated for the two treatment plans. RESULTS: At last follow-up (median follow-up, 2.6 years), there were two patients with recurrences, including metastatic disease in the patient treated definitively with chemotherapy and PT without surgery and a local-regional recurrence in the lung outside the proton field in one of the post-operative cases. No patients with de novo disease experienced grade ≥3 toxicities after PT. The mean dose to the heart, lung, and esophagus was reduced on average by 36.5%, 33.5%, and 60%, respectively, using PT compared with IMRT (P<0.05 for each dose parameter). CONCLUSIONS: PT achieved superior dose sparing to the heart, lung, and esophagus compared to IMRT for thymic malignancies. Patients treated with PT had few radiation-induced toxicities and similar survival compared to historic proton data.
Authors: Abigail T Berman; Leslie Litzky; Virginia Livolsi; Sunil Singhal; John C Kucharczuk; Joel D Cooper; Joseph R Friedberg; Tracey L Evans; James P Stevenson; James M Metz; Stephen M Hahn; Ramesh Rengan Journal: Cancer Date: 2011-02-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: He J Zhu; Romaine C Nichols; Randal H Henderson; Christopher G Morris; Dat C Pham; Lisa Jones; Bradford S Hoppe Journal: Acta Oncol Date: 2017-11-06 Impact factor: 4.089
Authors: Joe Y Chang; Vivek Verma; Ming Li; Wencheng Zhang; Ritsuko Komaki; Charles Lu; Pamela K Allen; Zhongxing Liao; James Welsh; Steven H Lin; Daniel Gomez; Melenda Jeter; Michael O'Reilly; Ronald X Zhu; Xiaodong Zhang; Heng Li; Radhe Mohan; John V Heymach; Ara A Vaporciyan; Stephen Hahn; James D Cox Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2017-08-10 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Rahul R Parikh; Ryan Rhome; Eugen Hug; Henry Tsai; Oren Cahlon; Brian Chon; Anuj Goenka Journal: Clin Lung Cancer Date: 2016-06-08 Impact factor: 4.785
Authors: Frederika A van Nimwegen; Michael Schaapveld; David J Cutter; Cècile P M Janus; Augustinus D G Krol; Michael Hauptmann; Karen Kooijman; Judith Roesink; Richard van der Maazen; Sarah C Darby; Berthe M P Aleman; Flora E van Leeuwen Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-11-16 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: B S Hoppe; C E Hill-Kayser; Y D Tseng; S Flampouri; H M Elmongy; O Cahlon; N P Mendenhall; A Maity; L A McGee; J P Plastaras Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Laila König; Juliane Hörner-Rieber; Matthew Forsthoefel; Peter Haering; Eva Meixner; Tanja Eichkorn; Anna Krämer; Thomas Mielke; Eric Tonndorf-Martini; Matthias F Haefner; Jürgen Debus; Jonathan W Lischalk Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2022-05-13 Impact factor: 6.575
Authors: Umesh C Sharma; Swati D Sonkawade; Andrew Baird; Min Chen; Shirley Xu; Sandra Sexton; Anurag K Singh; Adrienne Groman; Steven G Turowski; Joseph A Spernyak; Supriya D Mahajan; Saraswati Pokharel Journal: Cardiooncology Date: 2018-12-18