| Literature DB >> 29876306 |
Marwa Eltarahony1, Sahar Zaki1, Zeinab Kheiralla2, Desouky Abd-El-Haleem1.
Abstract
The periplasmic nitrate reductase enzyme (NAP) has become attractive catalyst, whose exploitation has emerged as one of the indispensable strategies toward environmentally benign applications. To achieve them efficiently and overcome the sensitivity of NAP in harsh environmental circumstances, the immobilization for denitrifying bacteria and NAP enzyme for simultaneous bioremediation and bionanoparticles synthesis was studied. NAP catalyzed NO3- reduction at Vmax of 0.811 μM/min and Km of 14.02 mM. Concurrently, the immobilized MMT cells completely removed NO3- upon 192 h with AgNPs synthesis ranging from 23.26 to 58.14 nm as indicated by SEM. Wherase, immobilized NAP exhibited lower efficiency with 28.6% of NO3- elimination within 288 h and large aggregated AgNPs ranging from 94.44 nm to 172.22 nm. To the best of author knowledge, the immobilization for denitrifying bacteria and NAP enzyme for simultaneous bioremediation and bionanoparticles synthesis was not studied before.Entities:
Keywords: Bioremediation; Denitrification; Immobilization; Nanoparticles; Nitrate reductase
Year: 2018 PMID: 29876306 PMCID: PMC5989592 DOI: 10.1016/j.btre.2018.e00257
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Rep (Amst) ISSN: 2215-017X
Fig. 1The activity profile of NAP enzyme of strain MMT under different ranges of temperature (A) and pH (B).
Fig. 2Relative activity (%) at 4 °C and 30 °C for 240 h.
Inhibitors effect on NR activity.
| Inhibitor | Concentration | Relative activity (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Sodium Azid | 1.0 mM | 50.67 |
| 2.5 mM | 22.72 | |
| 5 mM | 8.81 | |
| 10 mM | 0 | |
| Potassium Cyanid | 1.0 mM | 39.74 |
| 2.5 mM | 13.61 | |
| 5 mM | 3.64 | |
| 10 mM | 0 | |
| Sodium Thiocyanate | 1.0 mM | 62.02 |
| 2.5 mM | 30.8 | |
| 5 mM | 11.5 | |
| 10 mM | 7.14 | |
| DTT | 1.0 mM | 43.68 |
| 2.5 mM | 9.1 | |
| 5 mM | 2.77 | |
| 10 mM | 0 | |
| PMSF | 1.0 mM | 36.84 |
| 2.5 mM | 6.92 | |
| 5 mM | 1.46 | |
| 10 mM | 0 | |
| H2O2 | 1.0 mM | 37.27 |
| 2.5 mM | 15.29 | |
| 5 mM | 5.61 | |
| 10 mM | 1.09 | |
| ß-mercaptoethanol | 1.0 mM | 20.02 |
| 2.5 mM | 0 | |
| 5 mM | 0 | |
| 10 mM | 0 | |
| Urea | 1 mM | 99.9 |
| 2.5 mM | 98.17 | |
| 5 mM | 62.18 | |
| 10 mM | 53.44 | |
| Phenol | 1 mM | 99.1 |
| 2.5 mM | 93.85 | |
| 5 mM | 46.74 | |
| 10 mM | 42.08 | |
Heavy Metals effect on NR activity.
| Heavy metal | concentration | Relative activity (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Fe 3+ | 1 mM | 101.09 |
| 2.5 mM | 92.73 | |
| 5 mM | 72.07 | |
| 10 mM | 53.16 | |
| Fe 2+ | 1 mM | 100.57 |
| 2.5 mM | 94.55 | |
| 5 mM | 93.09 | |
| 10 mM | 56.95 | |
| Ag + | 1 mM | 10.18 |
| 2.5 mM | 4 | |
| 5 mM | 0 | |
| 10 mM | 0 | |
| Mn 2+ | 1 mM | 72.72 |
| 2.5 mM | 70.76 | |
| 5 mM | 55.93 | |
| 10 mM | 37.31 | |
| Hg 2+ | 1 mM | 12.43 |
| 2.5 mM | 4.8 | |
| 5 mM | 1.45 | |
| 10 mM | 0 | |
| Zn 2+ | 1 mM | 98.88 |
| 2.5 mM | 72.73 | |
| 5 mM | 59.56 | |
| 10 mM | 45.24 | |
| Co 2+ | 1 mM | 66.25 |
| 2.5 mM | 58.98 | |
| 5 mM | 51.13 | |
| 10 mM | 37.67 | |
| Ni 2+ | 1 mM | 64.68 |
| 2.5 mM | 52.92 | |
| 5 mM | 49.11 | |
| 10 mM | 32.92 | |
| Cr 3+ | 1 mM | 45.52 |
| 2.5 mM | 40.73 | |
| 5 mM | 22.69 | |
| 10 mM | 7.93 | |
| Cu 2+ | 1 mM | 100.4 |
| 2.5 mM | 93.82 | |
| 5 mM | 78.55 | |
| 10 mM | 49.67 | |
| Cd 2+ | 1 mM | 9.96 |
| 2.5 mM | 3.27 | |
| 5 mM | 0 | |
| 10 mM | 0 | |
| Pb 2+ | 1 mM | 53.09 |
| 2.5 mM | 48.22 | |
| 5 mM | 35.42 | |
| 10 mM | 13.24 | |
Cations, anions and chelating agents effect on NAP activity.
| Cations | Concentration | Relative activity (%) | Anions & chelating agents | Relative activity (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Na+ | 1 mM | 99.57 | SO42− | 99.57 |
| 2.5 mM | 90.04 | 70.56 | ||
| 5 mM | 89.61 | 69.99 | ||
| 10 mM | 89.26 | 69.84 | ||
| K+ | 1 mM | 99.71 | CO32− | 58.38 |
| 2.5 mM | 89.11 | 51.00 | ||
| 5 mM | 88.18 | 44.77 | ||
| 10 mM | 85.82 | 38.47 | ||
| NH4+ | 1 mM | 99.93 | Cl− | 99.57 |
| 2.5 mM | 92.34 | 90.04 | ||
| 5 mM | 91.05 | 89.61 | ||
| 10 mM | 88.11 | 89.26 | ||
| Mg2+ | 1 mM | 93.12 | I − | 77.01 |
| 2.5 mM | 65.26 | 58.17 | ||
| 5 mM | 62.68 | 56.23 | ||
| 10 mM | 62.20 | 43.91 | ||
| Ca2+ | 1 mM | 92.55 | EDTA | 89.74 |
| 2.5 mM | 66.40 | 62.26 | ||
| 5 mM | 61.46 | 54.85 | ||
| 10 mM | 61.39 | 32.01 | ||
| Ba 2+ | 1 mM | 92.34 | 8-Hydroxyquinolon | 38.47 |
| 2.5 mM | 64.61 | 22.83 | ||
| 5 mM | 58.24 | 7.34 | ||
| 10 mM | 56.52 | 1.03 | ||
Influence of various detergents and organic solvent on NAP activity.
| Agent | Concentration | Relative activity (%) |
|---|---|---|
| DMSO | 0.50% | 95.45 |
| 1% | 90.09 | |
| 3% | 59.62 | |
| 5% | 20.78 | |
| SLS | 0.50% | 21.83 |
| 1% | 18.11 | |
| 3% | 8.29 | |
| 5% | 4.24 | |
| Triton- X-100 | 0.50% | 31.73 |
| 1% | 21.74 | |
| 3% | 12.87 | |
| 5% | 7.24 | |
| Tween-20 | 0.50% | 40.88 |
| 1% | 28.40 | |
| 3% | 19.38 | |
| 5% | 10.30 | |
Fig. 3Preservation of NAP at −20 °C in the presence/absence of preservation buffer.
Fig. 4Lineweaver-Burk plot of velocity versus substrate concentration.
Fig. 5Application of immobilized MMT cells in A) removal of NO3− and NO3− from artificial wastewater, B) Biosynthesized AgNPs. Arrows pointing to tiny AgNPs.
Fig. 6Application of immobilized NAP-enzyme in: A) removal of NO3− from artificial wastewater, B) Biosynthesized AgNPs, Arrows pointing to AgNPs aggregates.
Fig. 7EDX pattern of immobilized MMT-cells (A) and immobilized NAP-enzyme (B) beads at the end of incubation period.
Fig. 8XRD crystallographic pattern of immobilized MMT-cells (A) and immobilized NAP-enzyme (B) beads at the end of incubation period.