Literature DB >> 29875995

Autophagy inhibition improves anti-cancer drugs via FOXO3a activation.

Brent E Fitzwalter1, Andrew Thorburn1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autophagy; CRISPR/Cas9; FOXO3a; MDM2; PUMA; apoptosis

Year:  2018        PMID: 29875995      PMCID: PMC5986638          DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.25366

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncotarget        ISSN: 1949-2553


× No keyword cloud information.
Autophagy is believed to prevent tumor initiation by promoting DNA stability, mitochondrial turnover, and tissue homeostasis. However, once a tumor has been established, autophagy allows cancer cells to overcome nutrient and environmental stresses associated with tumor cell proliferation and microenvironment [1]. Inhibiting autophagy in cancer may be a therapeutic intervention to promote cell death [2, 3], and thus understanding the molecular mechanisms linking autophagy and apoptosis is essential [4]. There are many ongoing clinical trials using autophagy inhibitors to enhance the efficacy of anti-cancer drugs, but there is limited mechanistic insight as to why they cooperate to induce more tumor cell death. Cancer cells are, in most cases, primed to undergo apoptosis; they integrate environmental pro- and anti-apoptotic signals by using protein-protein interactions between BH3-only pro-apoptotic proteins, the apoptosis effectors BAX and BAK, and BCL-2 anti-apoptotic proteins. Cytotoxic drugs act by pushing cancer cells to commit apoptosis, and are beneficial in many cancer types and continue to be widely used [5]. Additionally, targeted therapies capitalize on specific cancer cell vulnerabilities to promote cancer cell death. It is important to understand how both cytotoxic and targeted therapies affect apoptosis threshold to commit cancer cells to undergo apoptosis. A recent study [6] from our laboratory uncovers a transcriptional mechanism linking autophagy and apoptosis that provides a basis to inhibit autophagy to improve anti-cancer drugs (Figure 1). This study extends previous work reporting that PUMA levels increase upon autophagy inhibition, and that this increase in PUMA levels is essential for mediating apoptosis sensitization when combining autophagy inhibition with apoptosis-inducing ligands like TRAIL [7]. We found that genetic or pharmacological autophagy inhibition increases PUMA levels by increasing transactivation by the Forkhead Box transcription factor FOXO3a at a single Forkhead Response Element (FHRE) in an intron of the BBC3/PUMA gene. Importantly, CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout of this endogenous FHRE completely blocked the ability of autophagy inhibition to upregulate PUMA mRNA levels, but still allowed for PUMA upregulation in other contexts (p53 activation for example).
Figure 1

Autophagy determines sensitivity to chemotherapy

Autophagic turnover of FOXO3a confers low sensitization to chemotherapy-induced apoptosis. However, upon autopagy inhibition, FOXO3a transactivation of PUMA confers high sensitization to chemotherapy-induced apoptosis.

Autophagy determines sensitivity to chemotherapy

Autophagic turnover of FOXO3a confers low sensitization to chemotherapy-induced apoptosis. However, upon autopagy inhibition, FOXO3a transactivation of PUMA confers high sensitization to chemotherapy-induced apoptosis. How can this mechanism be leveraged to improve cancer therapy? We showed that lysosomal disruption by chloroquine (a drug that is used in people to inhibit autophagy, but also affect other lysosomal-related processes and has lysosome independent effects as well) sensitizes cells to apoptosis upon treatment with the DNA damaging agents such as doxorubicin and etoposide, but this combinatorial effect was dependent on the ability of FOXO3a to bind to the BBC3/PUMA locus. We took the mechanism a step further to change the mode of action of an anti-cancer drug called Nutlin from cancer cell growth arrest to causing apoptosis upon autophagy inhibition. These in vitro data indicate that Nutlin and lysosomal inhibition cooperate to cause cancer cells to commit to apoptosis. Similar results were obtained for genetic autophagy inhibition and Nutlin combination, indicating that these effects involve macroautophagy’s ability to regulate apoptosis and not autophagy-independent effects of chloroquine. Again, these effects were dependent on the ability of FOXO3a to bind to the BBC3/PUMA locus. Consistent with these data, mice with xenograft tumors grown from parental HCT116 cells and treated with the combination of Nutlin and chloroquine had significantly better survival based on tumor burden compared to the two drugs alone. However, mice with tumors grown from cells lacking the endogenous FHRE in the BBC3/PUMA locus failed to respond to this combination treatment and displayed no better survival than parental tumors treated with Nutlin alone. These data indicate that the combination of chloroquine and Nutlin can reduce tumor burden in vivo, and that this combinatorial benefit of autophagy inhibition depends on the ability of FOXO3a to bind to the BBC3/PUMA locus in these cancer cells. Mechanistic insight into how autophagy impacts apoptosis is just beginning to be understood. FOXO3a-mediated upregulation of BBC3/PUMA to mediate apoptosis sensitization provides a rationale for combining DNA damaging agents or Nutlin derivatives with autophagy inhibition in cancer therapy. Future studies should determine if this mechanism applies in a range of cancer types, and in the context of other anti-cancer drugs. Additionally, are different cancer sub-types dependent on other BH3-only proteins for apoptosis sensitization upon autophagy inhibition? Addressing these questions may uncover the potential of autophagy manipulation in patients to improve current therapies.
  7 in total

1.  Cell Death and Cancer Therapy: Don't Forget to Kill the Cancer Cell!

Authors:  Anthony Letai
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2015-11-15       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  Autophagy controls the kinetics and extent of mitochondrial apoptosis by regulating PUMA levels.

Authors:  Jacqueline Thorburn; Zdenek Andrysik; Leah Staskiewicz; Jacob Gump; Paola Maycotte; Andrew Oberst; Douglas R Green; Joaquín M Espinosa; Andrew Thorburn
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 9.423

Review 3.  Targeting autophagy in cancer.

Authors:  Jean M Mulcahy Levy; Christina G Towers; Andrew Thorburn
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 60.716

4.  Autophagy Inhibition Mediates Apoptosis Sensitization in Cancer Therapy by Relieving FOXO3a Turnover.

Authors:  Brent E Fitzwalter; Christina G Towers; Kelly D Sullivan; Zdenek Andrysik; Maria Hoh; Michael Ludwig; Jim O'Prey; Kevin M Ryan; Joaquin M Espinosa; Michael J Morgan; Andrew Thorburn
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 12.270

Review 5.  Autophagy in malignant transformation and cancer progression.

Authors:  Lorenzo Galluzzi; Federico Pietrocola; José Manuel Bravo-San Pedro; Ravi K Amaravadi; Eric H Baehrecke; Francesco Cecconi; Patrice Codogno; Jayanta Debnath; David A Gewirtz; Vassiliki Karantza; Alec Kimmelman; Sharad Kumar; Beth Levine; Maria Chiara Maiuri; Seamus J Martin; Josef Penninger; Mauro Piacentini; David C Rubinsztein; Hans-Uwe Simon; Anne Simonsen; Andrew M Thorburn; Guillermo Velasco; Kevin M Ryan; Guido Kroemer
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 6.  Recent insights into cell death and autophagy.

Authors:  Brent E Fitzwalter; Andrew Thorburn
Journal:  FEBS J       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 5.542

Review 7.  Therapeutic Targeting of Autophagy.

Authors:  Christina G Towers; Andrew Thorburn
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2016-10-23       Impact factor: 8.143

  7 in total
  6 in total

1.  Anticancer and Differentiation Properties of the Nitric Oxide Derivative of Lopinavir in Human Glioblastoma Cells.

Authors:  Maria Sofia Basile; Emanuela Mazzon; Tamara Krajnovic; Dijana Draca; Eugenio Cavalli; Yousef Al-Abed; Placido Bramanti; Ferdinando Nicoletti; Sanja Mijatovic; Danijela Maksimovic-Ivanic
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 4.411

2.  Targeting Autophagy by MPT0L145, a Highly Potent PIK3C3 Inhibitor, Provides Synergistic Interaction to Targeted or Chemotherapeutic Agents in Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Chun-Han Chen; Tsung-Han Hsieh; Yu-Chen Lin; Yun-Ru Liu; Jing-Ping Liou; Yun Yen
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 3.  Role of FOXO Transcription Factors in Cancer Metabolism and Angiogenesis.

Authors:  Mohd Farhan; Marta Silva; Xing Xingan; Yu Huang; Wenhua Zheng
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 4.  The role of FOXOs and autophagy in cancer and metastasis-Implications in therapeutic development.

Authors:  Mohd Farhan; Marta Silva; Shuai Li; Fengxia Yan; Jiankang Fang; Tangming Peng; Jim Hu; Ming-Sound Tsao; Peter Little; Wenhua Zheng
Journal:  Med Res Rev       Date:  2020-05-31       Impact factor: 12.944

5.  Pitavastatin Induces Cancer Cell Apoptosis by Blocking Autophagy Flux.

Authors:  Nirmala Tilija Pun; Naeun Lee; Sang-Hoon Song; Chul-Ho Jeong
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 5.810

6.  Autophagy and cancer: Modulation of cell death pathways and cancer cell adaptations.

Authors:  Christina G Towers; Darya Wodetzki; Andrew Thorburn
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 10.539

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.