Literature DB >> 29875870

Food Safety Knowledge and Practices of Male Adolescents in West of Iran.

Amin Mirzaei1, Heshmatollah Nourmoradi2,3, Mohammad Sadegh Abedzadeh Zavareh1, Mohsen Jalilian1, Morteza Mansourian4, Sajad Mazloomi3, Neda Mokhtari5, Fariba Mokhtari1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Every year many people around the world become infected with food-borne infections. Insufficient knowledge and skills related to food safety and hygiene are among the factors affecting the incidence of food-borne diseases, especially in adolescents. AIM: The purpose of this study was to determine the knowledge and practices associated with food safety and hygiene in Ilam city male adolescents.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three hundred and eighty of male adolescents aged 13 to 19 were selected randomly and entered the cross-sectional study. Data were collected using a researcher-made questionnaire From December 2016 to February 2017. Descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, independent t-test and one-way ANOVA were used to analyse the data in SPSS software (version 19.0).
RESULTS: The findings of the study showed a positive and significant relationship between knowledge and practices related to food safety and hygiene (r = 0.122; p = 0.018). Also, the findings showed that food safety knowledge and practice of adolescents were significantly affected by the level of their education, parental education level, parental employment status and household economic conditions, (p < 0.005). Also, the results showed that the participants generally obtained 57.74% of the knowledge score and 57.63% of practices score. The subjects had the most knowledge about food supply and storage (60%), and the highest practice was related to personal and environmental hygiene, (61.73%).
CONCLUSION: The inadequacy of knowledge and performance of adolescents about food safety and hygiene shows the need for implementation of health education interventions in this area.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescents; Food Safety; Food-borne Diseases; Knowledge; Practices

Year:  2018        PMID: 29875870      PMCID: PMC5985871          DOI: 10.3889/oamjms.2018.175

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Open Access Maced J Med Sci        ISSN: 1857-9655


Introduction

Food-borne diseases are among the most important public health challenges and one of the major barriers to socioeconomic development worldwide [1]. The results of various studies show that a wide range of infectious diseases spread to humans through unhealthy foods and cause food poisoning, diarrhoea and death [2]. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), in 2010 there were a total of 600 million cases of illness and 420,000 deaths from food-borne diseases worldwide which most of them were related to diarrheal disease agents. Also, according to the report, 31 risk factors for food-borne diseases have been identified, which are responsible for 32 food-borne diseases [1]. Also, food-borne diseases impose high costs on the health system of countries. WHO has estimated the global burden of foodborne diseases to be around 33 million DALYs in 2010 [1]. Pathogenic agents are transmitted to food from all stages of production to distribution and consumption of food through contaminated equipment, food handlers and also final consumers [3]. Several factors affect the incidence of food-borne diseases; the most important of them are contaminated food supplies, inappropriate food storage, providing food from unhygienic sources, and poor personal hygiene [4]. In addition to the factors mentioned above, inadequate monitoring of food production, distribution and supply, and inadequate health education programs are other reasons for the growing incidence of food-borne diseases, especially in developing countries [5] [6] [7]. On the other hand, demand for cheap and ready-to-eat foods that often are produced in unhealthy conditions is being increased [6] [7]. The results of various studies show that if the food health and safety principles are maintained from the production stages to the consumption, many of the water and food-borne diseases are prevented and controlled and food security of consumers is provided [8] [9]. Food safety is defined as the degree of confidence that food will not cause illness or harm to consumers [7]. Consumers are the last link in the chain of food production to consumption, and they are the most important step in combating food-borne diseases through proper selection, purchase, storage and preparation of food products [8] [11]. However, most studies on food hygiene have focused on food handlers but, food consumers have been less targeted by various studies. Previous studies have shown that people especially in less developed countries have poor knowledge and skills in relation to food safety and hygiene [12]. Meanwhile, adolescences need a more educational program in the field of food safety [7] [8] [13]. Adolescences have a significant role in buying, storing and even preparing food, and in the future, their role will be greater [7] [14]. On the other hand, adolescents’ exposure to puberty leads to an increase in the spirit of independence and tendency toward peer groups. So, they are more likely to consume fast food/snack away from home rather than at home meal. Due to this reason, adolescents are more at risk to food-borne diseases [14] [15] [16]. Previous studies have reported that knowledge is the most important predictor of safe nutritional behaviors in adolescents [17]. Therefore, assessing the level of adolescents’ knowledge and practices in relation to food safety is a fundamental step towards planning future educational interventions. The purpose of this study was to assess food safety-related knowledge and practices of male adolescents in the west of Iran.

Material and Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted from December 2016 to May 2017 on food safety knowledge and practice of adolescent consumers in the Ilam city (west of Iran). A total of 380 voluntary male adolescents were selected by sampling and included in the study. Research Ethics Committee of Ilam University of Medical Sciences approved the present study. The data collection was carried out through a 56-items researcher-made questionnaire as self-report. The questionnaire consists of three sections: A demographic section includes 10 items (Age, educational status, parents’ educational level, parents’ employment status and family economic status). Food safety knowledge scale includes 25 items (For example consumption of food and hot drinks in disposable plastic cups and dishes is dangerous to health). The knowledge section answers scoring was as Yes = 2, I don’t know = 1 and No = 0. Food safety practices scale includes 21 items (For instance: how often do you pay attention to the date of production and expiration when you purchase food?). The practice section answers were scored with a five-point Likert scale from never = 1 to always = 5. Reliability of the questionnaire was estimated using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of internal consistency. The Cronbach’s alpha for food safety knowledge and practice was estimated to be 0.81 and 0.86, respectively. Time needed to complete the questionnaire was approximately 25 minutes. The data analysis was conducted with SPSS software (version 19.0). Descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, independent t-test and one-way ANOVA were used to analyse the data. P-values less than 0.05 were considered as statistically significant.

Results

Three hundred and eighty boys aged 13 to 19 years old in Ilam city, with an average age of 16.38 ± 1.65 years, participated in this study. Most participants are being educated in high school (74.07%) and had a moderate economic status (54.07%). Absolute and relative frequencies, mean and standard deviation of knowledge and practice scores regarding demographic variables are shown in Table 1.
Table 1

Absolute frequency, relative frequency, mean and standard deviation of knowledge and practice scores regarding demographic variables

VariablesN (%)KnowledgePractices
M ± SDp-valueM ±SDp-value
Educational Status
Student284 (74.7)28.27 ± 7.960.01059.91 ± 15.440.090
Graduated96 (25.3)30.61 ± 7.4362.34 ± 11.01
Father Educational Status
Under Diploma158 (41.6)27.19 ± 7.1459.24 ± 13.97
Diploma88 (23.2)28.48 ± 8.23< 0.00161.59 ± 14.84< 0.346
University education134 (35.3)31.08 ± 8.0261.33 ± 14.80
Mother Educational Status
Under Diploma211 (55.5)28.73 ± 8.2360.00 ± 14.65
Diploma82 (21.6)27.01 ± 6.33< 0.00563.35 ± 12.69< 0.122
University education87 (22.9)30.94 ± 7.9459.12 ± 15.40
Father Job Status
Unemployed19 (5.0)24.36 ± 5.7655.42 ± 15.06
Employee166 (43.7)30.50 ± 8.05< 0.00161.10 ± 16.19< 0.270
Self-employed195 (51.3)27.91 ± 7.6160.53 ± 12.74
Mother Job Status
Housekeeper294 (77.4)28.81 ± 7.7161.48 ± 14.22
Employee67 (17.6)30.41 ± 8.58< 0.01058.46 ± 14.72< 0.018
Self-employed19 (5.0)24.21 ± 6.3052.89 ± 15.19
Family Economic Status
Weak64 (16.8)26.06 ± 7.0257.45 ± 15.40
Moderate208 (54.7)28.92 ± 7.06< 0.00259.75 ± 13.69< 0.010
Good108 (28.4)30.42 ± 8.5063.82 ± 14.91
Absolute frequency, relative frequency, mean and standard deviation of knowledge and practice scores regarding demographic variables The results showed that adolescents graduated from high school (p < 0.01), adolescents with more educated parents (p < 0.005), adolescents with employed parents (p < 0.01), as well as adolescents with a good economic situation (p < 0.02) had a higher level of knowledge about food hygiene. However, the results of food safety related to practice showed that the higher levels were only found in the adolescents with householder mothers (p < 0.01) and in the adolescents with a good family economic status (p < 0.05). Also, Pearson correlation test showed a positive and significant relationship between knowledge and practices related to food safety and hygiene (r = 0.122; p = 0.018). Table 2 shows the mean and standard deviation of the total knowledge and practices scores related to food hygiene and three sub-scales including personal and environmental hygiene, food supply and storage, and food consumption. As seen, the participants obtained 57.74% of the knowledge score and 57.63% of practices score. The highest and lowest obtained scores of knowledge were related to the food supply and storage (60%) and food consumption (52.87%), respectively. Also, the highest and lowest obtained scores of practices were related to personal and environmental hygiene (61.73%) and food consumption (53.82%), respectively. Moreover, 33.4% of the adolescents reported that they had not received any education regarding food hygiene. Figure 1 illustrates the contribution of different educational resources to increase the adolescents’ information regarding food hygiene and safety. As it can be seen, the Internet had the highest roll with 22.3%, and health staff (8.4%) had the lowest role in adolescent food safety education.
Table 2

Mean and standard deviation of the total knowledge and practices scores related to food hygiene and three sub-scales

VariablesMeanSDObtainable Scores Range
Total Food Hygiene Knowledge28.877.880 – 50
Personal and Environmental Food Hygiene7.182.720 – 12
Food Preparation and Preservation13.23.850 – 22
Food Consumption8.463.040 – 16
Total Food Hygiene Practices60.5214.4721 – 105
Personal and Environmental Food Hygiene18.525.426 – 30
Preparation and Preservation of Food20.465.747 – 35
Food Consumption21.535.428 – 40
Figure 1

Sources of information of study subjects on food safety and hygiene (%)

Mean and standard deviation of the total knowledge and practices scores related to food hygiene and three sub-scales Sources of information of study subjects on food safety and hygiene (%)

Discussion

This study aimed to determine the status of knowledge and practices of adolescent boys about food safety and hygiene. The subjects reported moderate levels of food safety knowledge and practice. These findings indicated inadequate knowledge and practice of the subjects about food safety and health. In this study, the knowledge and practice of the adolescents were studied both in total and regarding three areas include 1) Personal and Environmental Food Hygiene (PEH), 2) Food Preparation and Preservation (FPP), and 3) Food Consumption (FC). Accordingly, the results of the study showed that the level of adolescents’ knowledge in two areas of FPP and PEH was better than of FC. The food consumption practice was also weaker in two other areas. Findings of other studies indicated that food consumers had poor knowledge and practice in relation to food safety [2] [7] [18]. Socioeconomic factors seem to play a crucial role in the knowledge and practices of male adolescents in the field of food safety and hygiene. The results of present study showed that adolescents’ knowledge regarding food safety was significantly affected by their educational status (Studying or have graduated), parents’ educational level, parents’ job status and household economic conditions. So that, the results indicated the higher knowledge of adolescents with higher educated parents and graduated adolescents. Additionally, adolescents with employed parents and also adolescents with good household economic status significantly had more knowledge about food safety and hygiene. However, the role of socioeconomic factors was more limited in adolescents practice in relation to food safety and hygiene. So that, only the mother’s job status and family economic status had a significant effect on the practice. Accordingly, the well-being of the family and stay-at-home mothers had a positive and significant influence on the practice of the adolescents in relation to food safety and hygiene. Therefore, in several studies, the effect of socioeconomic factors on the knowledge and practice of adolescents in relation to food safety has been reported [8] [18] [19] [20] [21]. Generally, it can be said that the higher education level of adolescents and their parents has a positive effect on food safety-related knowledge [19] [20] [21], although it does not guarantee a proper practice [22]. However, the job status of the parents and the household’s economic situation have a positive impact on the knowledge as well as improving the practice of adolescents in relation to food safety [20]. In the present study, adolescents with employed mothers were more knowledgeable about food safety and hygiene, while the children of the housewife’s mothers reported better practice. These findings can be explained by the fact that employed mothers have more access to knowledge sources related to food safety due to higher levels of literacy and more presence in the society. Therefore, much of their knowledge can be passed to their children. Of course, resources that generate knowledge in adolescents do not necessarily enhance their behaviour, and vice versa, resources that affect behaviour may not be a good source of knowledge. Hence, housewife mothers can be good role models for learning skills related to the prevention of food-borne diseases in adolescents [23] [24]. Adolescences, especially adolescent boys, tend to model from out-of-home patterns including peers and friends, and for this reason, they spend more time outdoors than their childhood [14] [25] [26]. As a result, they eat more out-of-home foods that often include ready-to-eat meals, junk foods and street foods that increase the risk of food-borne diseases [25] [26]. Health education seems to be the most important need for adolescents to prevent food-borne diseases [7] [13]. With the passing of the childhood, the social responsibility of adolescents is increased. So, they play a more active role in the selection, purchase, preparation and preservation of foods [8]. Accordingly, teenage is a great opportunity to implement health education interventions and develop knowledge and skills related to food safety and hygiene [14]. The fact is that as long as the adolescents are not adequately aware of the potential dangers of food-borne contamination, they will not have enough motivation to adopt the preventive behaviours [8] [27]. According to the results of present study, about one-third of the participants reported that so far they have not received any education about food safety and hygiene. Of the adolescents who were educated, only 15% and 4.3% of them were educated by school staff and healthcare system, respectively. These findings indicated that only small proportion of food safety and hygiene education of the adolescents provided by healthcare staff or school health care providers. On the other hand, the role of mass media in educating adolescents about food safety more reported [8] [28]. In this study, the Internet and virtual communication social networks were provided 32.5% of the food safety education to the adolescents. Also, radio and television (17.2%) and printed media (13.2%) had a significant contribution to the education of food safety to the adolescents. Similar studies in other developing countries also indicated that there were not adequate educating programs in the field of food safety and hygiene, especially for adolescents [29]. In today’s world, Web-based educational resources play an important role in promoting health-related knowledge and practices of adolescents [30, 31]. However, the educational content provided by the Internet may not have sufficient scientific credibility and always cannot be trusted. Therefore, due to the high interest of adolescents to Web-based educational resources, it is suggested that these methods be used in further educational interventions in the field of food safety and hygiene. In this way, the interest and selection of adolescents are respected and can also be acted as a credible scientific resource for educating health topics in the Internet environment. In summary, the results of this study indicated the inadequate knowledge and practices of male adolescents in relation to food safety and hygiene. Since adolescents are vulnerable and at risk for food-borne diseases. Consequently, they should be more targeted at food safety educational interventions.
  14 in total

Review 1.  A review of family and social determinants of children's eating patterns and diet quality.

Authors:  Heather Patrick; Theresa A Nicklas
Journal:  J Am Coll Nutr       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 2.  Changing epidemiology of food-borne disease: a Minnesota perspective.

Authors:  C W Hedberg; K L MacDonald; M T Osterholm
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 9.079

3.  The relationship between parental modeling, eating patterns, and dietary intake among African-American parents.

Authors:  T Tibbs; D Haire-Joshu; K B Schechtman; R C Brownson; M S Nanney; C Houston; W Auslander
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2001-05

4.  Consumer knowledge of foodborne microbial hazards and food-handling practices.

Authors:  S F Altekruse; D A Street; S B Fein; A S Levy
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.077

5.  Surveillance for foodborne-disease outbreaks--United States, 1998-2002.

Authors:  Michael Lynch; John Painter; Rachel Woodruff; Christopher Braden
Journal:  MMWR Surveill Summ       Date:  2006-11-10

6.  Focus group studies on food safety knowledge, perceptions, and practices of school-going adolescent girls in South India.

Authors:  Subba Rao M Gavaravarapu; Sudershan R Vemula; Pratima Rao; Vishnu Vardhana Rao Mendu; Kalpagam Polasa
Journal:  J Nutr Educ Behav       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.045

7.  Comparison of food safety cognitions and self-reported food-handling behaviors with observed food safety behaviors of young adults.

Authors:  J M Abbot; C Byrd-Bredbenner; D Schaffner; C M Bruhn; L Blalock
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2007-11-14       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 8.  Consumer food handling in the home: a review of food safety studies.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Redmond; Christopher J Griffith
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.077

9.  Social Cognitive Predictors of Breakfast Consumption in Primary School's Male Students.

Authors:  Amin Mirzaei; Fazlollah Ghofranipour; Zeinab Ghazanfari
Journal:  Glob J Health Sci       Date:  2015-05-17

Review 10.  The role of the home environment in the transmission of infectious diseases.

Authors:  Lori J Kagan; Allison E Aiello; Elaine Larson
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2002-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.