| Literature DB >> 29875683 |
Fang-Hui Li1,2, Tao Li3, Jing-Yi Ai1, Lei Sun1, Zhu Min1, Rui Duan3, Ling Zhu3, Yan-Ying Liu2, Timon Cheng-Yi Liu3.
Abstract
The effects of high-intensity interval (HIIT) and moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) on basal autophagy and mitochondrial function in cardiac and skeletal muscle and plasma metabolic phenotypes have not been clearly characterized. Here, we investigated how 10-weeks HIIT and MICT differentially modify basal autophagy and mitochondrial markers in cardiac and skeletal muscle and conducted an untargeted metabolomics study with proton nuclear magnetic resonance (1H NMR) spectroscopy and multivariate statistical analysis of plasma metabolic phenotypes. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were separated into three groups: sedentary control (SED), MICT, and HIIT. Rats underwent evaluation of exercise performance, including exercise tolerance and grip strength, and blood lactate levels were measured immediately after an incremental exercise test. Plasma samples were analyzed by 1H NMR. The expression of autophagy and mitochondrial markers and autophagic flux (LC3II/LC3-I ratio) in cardiac, rectus femoris, and soleus muscle were analyzed by western blotting. Time to exhaustion and grip strength increased significantly following HIIT compared with that in both SED and MICT groups. Compared with those in the SED group, blood lactate level, and the expression of SDH, COX-IV, and SIRT3 significantly increased in rectus femoris and soleus muscle of both HIIT and MICT groups. Meanwhile, SDH and COX-IV content of cardiac muscle and COX-IV and SIRT3 content of rectus femoris and soleus muscle increased significantly following HIIT compared with that following MICT. The expression of LC3-II, ATG-3, and Beclin-1 and LC3II/LC3-I ratio were significantly increased only in soleus and cardiac muscle following HIIT. These data indicate that HIIT was more effective for improving physical performance and facilitating cardiac and skeletal muscle adaptations that increase mitochondrial function and basal autophagic activities. Moreover, 1H NMR spectroscopy and multivariate statistical analysis identified 11 metabolites in plasma, among which fine significantly and similarly changed after both HIIT and MICT, while BCAAs isoleucine, leucine, and valine and glutamine were changed only after HIIT. Together, these data indicate distinct differences in specific metabolites and autophagy and mitochondrial markers following HIIT vs. MICT and highlight the value of metabolomic analysis in providing more detailed insight into the metabolic adaptations to exercise training.Entities:
Keywords: NMR spectroscopy; continuous training; exercise tolerance; high-intensity interval training; metabolomics
Year: 2018 PMID: 29875683 PMCID: PMC5974531 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00571
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.566
Morphological characteristics of the experimental groups.
| Initial BW (g) | 225 ± 4.0 | 224 ± 6.0 | 222 ± 3.0g |
| Final BW (g) | 674 ± 45 | 525 ± 24 | 520 ± 38 |
| Perirenal adipose tissue weight (g) | 17.0 ± 3.20 | 5.73 ± 2.80 | 5.04 ± 1.85 |
| Quadriceps weight (g) | 10.4 ± 1.10 | 9.25 ± 0.28 | 8.78 ± 0.68 |
| Gastrocnemius weight (g) | 7.76 ± 0.84 | 6.95 ± 0.45 | 6.27 ± 0.63 |
| Soleus muscles weight (g) | 0.65 ± 0.22 | 0.57 ± 0.08 | 0.61 ± 0.14 |
| Extensor digitorum longus weight (g) | 0.68 ± 0.16 | 0.58 ± 0.08 | 0.60 ± 0.05 |
| Epididymis weight (g) | 4.10 ± 0.18 | 3.76 ± 0.17 | 3.75 ± 0.38 |
| Relative perirenal adipose tissue weight (%) | 2.60 ± 0.50 | 1.10 ± 0.50 | 1.00 ± 0.40 |
| Relative quadriceps weight (%) | 1.61 ± 0.14 | 1.81 ± 0.13 | 1.78 ± 0.09 |
| Relative gastrocnemius weight (%) | 1.16 ± 0.09 | 1.41 ± 0.09 | 1.32 ± 0.08 |
| Relative soleus muscles weight (%) | 0.10 ± 0.03 | 0.11 ± 0.02 | 0.13 ± 0.03 |
| Relative extensor digitorum longus weight (%) | 0.10 ± 0.03 | 0.12 ± 0.01 | 0.12 ± 0.01 |
| Relative epididymis weight (%) | 0.62 ± 0.02 | 0.75 ± 0.03 | 0.76 ± 0.06 |
Values are reported as the mean ± standard deviation. Groups: SED, sedentary control; MICT, moderate-intensity continuous training; HIIT, high-intensity interval training. BW, body weight; Relative tissue weight (%) = tissue weight (g)/final body weight (g) × 100%.
P < 0.05,
P < 0.01. Means with different superscripts in each row are significantly different from SED (one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post-hoc test).
Effect sizes with confidence intervals for time to exhaustion, grip strength, and blood lactate level.
| 35.6 ± 14.0 | 83.6 ± 28.7 | 120.8 ± 28.4 | 135 | 2.16 (−14 to 10.8) | 239 | 3.87 (−12.2 to 12.6) | 44.5 | 1.36 (−14.7 to 19.2) | |
| 3.64 ± 0.60 | 4.37 ± 0.37 | 5.31 ± 0.97 | 20.1 | 1.57 (1.4 to 1.9) | 45.9 | 2.12 (1.4 to 1.9) | 21.5 | 1.30 (1.6 to 2.5) | |
| Pre-EX | 1.43 ± 0.21 | 1.38 ± 0.20 | 1.45 ± 0.25 | −3.50 | −0.3 (−0.4 to 0.1) | 1.40 | 0.09 (−0.01 to 0.23) | 5.07 | 0.32 (−0.01 to 0.23) |
| I-EX | 6.48 ± 3.40 | 3.28 ± 0.72 | 2.81 ± 0.60 | −49.4 | −1.43 (−1.8 to 0.7) | −56.6 | −1.66 (−2.0 to 0.5) | −14.3 | −0.74 (−1.1 to −0.3) |
| 10 minPOST | 3.28 ± 2.40 | 2.11 ± 0.41 | 1.65 ± 0.75 | −35.7 | −0.75 (−1.0 to 0.7) | −49.7 | −1.00 (−1.4 to 0.5) | −21.8 | −0.78 (−1.2 to −0.5) |
| Exercise-time interaction | |||||||||
| Main effect for time | |||||||||
| Main effect for exercise | |||||||||
Values are mean ± standard deviation. ES, effect size; CI, confidence intervals. Groups: SED, sedentary control; MICT, moderate-intensity continuous training; HIIT, high-intensity interval training. I-EX, blood lactate level immediately after an incremental exercise test; 10 minPOST, blood lactate level 10 min after an incremental exercise test;
Significantly different from SED group rats (P < 0.05);
Significantly different from SED group rats (P < 0.01);
Significantly different from MICT group rats (P < 0.01).
Figure 1Protein content of autophagy and mitochondrial markers in soleus, rectus femoris, and cardiac muscle. Changes in content of mitochondrial function and autophagy markers in soleus (A,D), rectus femoris (B,E), cardiac muscle (C,F) in the three experimental groups. Levels of detected proteins were normalized to GAPDH. Densitometry analysis was performed to quantify the expression levels of detected proteins (a. u.). Values are mean ± standard deviation (n = 4). Groups: SED, sedentary control; MICT, moderate-intensity continuous training; HIIT, high-intensity interval training; *Significantly different from SED group rats (P < 0.05); **Significantly different from SED group rats (P < 0.01); # Significantly different from MICT group rats (P < 0.05); ## Significantly different from MICT group rats (P < 0.01).
Correlations between autophagy or mitochondrial markers in cardiac and skeletal muscle.
| LC3-II | |||||||||||||||||||||
| LC3-II/I | |||||||||||||||||||||
| ATG-3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Beclin1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| SDH | 0.48 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| COX-IV | 0.31 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| SIRT3 | 0.30 | 0.04 | 0.17 | 0.38 | 0.24 | −0.2 | |||||||||||||||
| ALDH2 | 0.01 | 0.13 | 0.11 | 0.18 | 0.01 | ||||||||||||||||
| LC3-II/I | 0.42 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| ATG-3 | 0.48 | −0.1 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Beclin1 | 0.02 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| SDH | |||||||||||||||||||||
| COX-IV | 0.08 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| SIRT3 | 0.19 | 0.08 | 0.12 | ||||||||||||||||||
| ALDH2 | −0.1 | 0.01 | −0.1 | −0.43 | −0.1 | −0.1 | 0.01 | ||||||||||||||
| LC3-II/I | −0.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| ATG-3 | 0.26 | 0.49 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Beclin1 | −0.2 | 0.21 | 0.02 | ||||||||||||||||||
| SDH | −0.1 | 0.37 | 0.31 | 0.15 | |||||||||||||||||
| COX-IV | −0.1 | 0.13 | −0.13 | ||||||||||||||||||
| SIRT3 | −0.3 | 0.46 | 0.01 | ||||||||||||||||||
| ALDH2 | −0.1 | 0.32 | 0.22 | 0.25 | |||||||||||||||||
Values are Pearson correlation coefficient (r). Pearson correlations were calculated for the above analyses (n = 12, pooled samples of SC, MICT, and HIIT groups, n = 4 per group); Black bold represents significant difference (P < 0.05) for Pearson correlation. R.M, rectus femoris muscle; S.M, soleus muscle; C.M, cardiac muscle.
Figure 2Representative 600-MHz NMR spectra, score plot of principal component analysis (PCA), and model of partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) of all serum samples. NMR spectra (A), score plot of PCA (B) and VIP score (C), score plot of PLS-DA (D), the 100 permutations test (E), and cross-validation score plots of PLS-DA (F). Sedentary control (SED) is represented in blue Δ A; moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) in red+B; high-intensity interval training (HIIT) in green × C in (B,D). On the right in (C), the levels (high-low) of metabolites in SED, MICT, and HIIT groups (n = 10) are represented.
One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post-hoc test with FDR correction and effect sizes for metabolites relative to SED after HIIT and MICT protocols.
| Glucose | 3.22 | 0.052 ± 0.004 | 0.046 ± 0.004 | 0.047 ± 0.005 | −13 | −1.57 | −13 | •1.15 | 1.00 | 1.058 | 0.23 | ||
| Lactate | 4.1 | 0.074 ± 0.015 | 0.091 ± 00.027 | 0.086 ± 00.032 | 23 | 0.164 | 0.80 | 16 | 0.383 | 0.49 | 0.95 | 2.790 | −0.18 |
| Lysine | 2.98 | 0.004 ± 0.0008 | 0.0053 ± 0.0006 | 0.0052 ± 0.0006 | 32 | 31 | 1.81 | 0.99 | 1.254 | −0.15 | |||
| 3–hydroxybutyrate | 2.26 | 0.0058 ± 0.0006 | 0.0077 ± 0.001 | 0.0078 ± 0.002 | 33 | 35 | 1.36 | 0.89 | 1.845 | 0.06 | |||
| Choline | 3.18 | 0.012 ± 0.002 | 0.0154 ± 00.002 | 0.0155 ± 0.002 | 28 | 29 | 1.84 | 1.01 | 0.922 | 0.05 | |||
| Glutamine | 2.42 | 0.015 ± 00.002 | 0.0186 ± 00.004 | 0.0186 ± 00.003 | 24 | 0.063 | 1.16 | 24 | 1.46 | 1.00 | 0.988 | 0 | |
| Glutamate | 2.34 | 0.015 ± 0.003 | 0.0192 ± 0.007 | 0.0182 ± 0.006 | 28 | 0.166 | 0.79 | 21 | 0.271 | 0.69 | 0.95 | 2.163 | −0.16 |
| Isoleucine | 0.98 | 0.012 ± 00.003 | 0.015 ± 00.004 | 0.016 ± 00.002 | 25 | 0.098 | 0.004 | 35 | 1.68 | 0.95 | 3.944 | 0.34 | |
| Leucine | 0.94 | 0.016 ± 00.003 | 0.0194 ± 0.004 | 0.0206 ± 0.002 | 21 | 0.114 | 0.99 | 29 | 1.93 | 0.99 | 1.402 | 0.41 | |
| Valine | 3.58 | 0.0065 ± 00.001 | 0.0079 ± 00.001 | 0.0082 ± 00.001 | 22 | 0.161 | 1.47 | 26 | 1.78 | 1.10 | 3.166 | 0.31 | |
| Tyrosine | 6.86 | 0.0015 ± 0.0002 | 0.0021 ± 0.0003 | 0.0022 ± 00.0002 | 43 | 0.021 | 3.15 | 45 | 3.67 | 1.01 | 1.625 | 0.52 | |
Values are mean ± standard deviation. Comparisons of the metabolite intensities of each group were performed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post-hoc test with false discovery rate (FDR) correction to avoid false positives, and a value of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Groups: SED, sedentary control; MICT, moderate-intensity continuous training; HIIT, high-intensity interval training. ES, effect size; Black bold represents significant difference between both exercise modalities and SED group; Red bold represents significant difference between HIIT and SED groups.