| Literature DB >> 29875606 |
Xia Chen1, Hang-Gui Lai1, Qi Sun1, Jin-Ping Liu1, Song-Bi Chen2, Wen-Li Zhu2.
Abstract
Apomixis, or asexual seed formation, is of great value for plant breeding and seed production, and is desirable in modern agriculture, but natural apomixis occurs in cassava at very low frequency. In present study, apomixis was induced by the treatments of female flower buds with 1%, 1.5% and 2% (v/v) dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and the results showed that 1.5% DMSO treatment was most effective for the induction of apomictic seed formation in cassava cultivar SC5 with the highest percentages of fruit set and true apomictic seeds. The germinated seedlings resembled their parents and displayed no morphological characteristics of cassava polyploid. Flow cytometry and chromosome counting showed that these plants were uniform diploids. Analysis of 34 DMSO-induced cassava progenies by the expressed sequence tag-simple sequence repeat (EST-SSR) and sequence-related amplified polymorphism (SRAP) markers showed that three true apomictic seeds were obtained from the group of SC5 treated with 1.5% DMSO.Entities:
Keywords: DMSO; EST-SSR markers; Manihot esculenta; SRAP markers; induced apomixis
Year: 2018 PMID: 29875606 PMCID: PMC5982182 DOI: 10.1270/jsbbs.17089
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Breed Sci ISSN: 1344-7610 Impact factor: 2.086
Forward and reverse primer information of six EST-SSR primer pairs for this study
| Name | Annealing Tm | Forward primer | Reverse primer |
|---|---|---|---|
| CESR-0410 | 57 | CAGCTCAGTACTCTCTCTCTCTC | GCTTATCAGAATCAACAATCC |
| CESR-0604 | 54 | AAAGAGGCTGGAGGAGGT | TCAACAGTGATCACAAGGAA |
| CESR-0624 | 54 | AAGCCTTAATTTGTCTTCCC | ACAGACAGAAACCACCACTC |
| CESR-0702 | 52 | ATATTTATGCTCGCTTCCTG | GTACCAGACACATGAATCCC |
| CESR-0745 | 54 | CACCTTCAAGCTCACAAA | CACGGTAGAAAGACCATAGC |
| CESR-0831 | 56 | CTTACACACCACCTTCAAGC | AGCACGGTAGAAAGACCATA |
The 33 SRAP primer combinations used in this study
| Varieties | No. | Primer combinations |
|---|---|---|
| SC5 | 1 | me1-em2 |
| 2 | me1-em5 | |
| 3 | me1-em7 | |
| 4 | me2-em4 | |
| 5 | me2-em7 | |
| 6 | me2-em8 | |
| 7 | me3-em5 | |
| 8 | me3-em6 | |
| 9 | me4-em2 | |
| 10 | me4-em3 | |
| 11 | me5-em4 | |
| 12 | me5-em5 | |
| 13 | Me5-em6 | |
| 14 | Me6-em5 | |
| 15 | me7-em2 | |
| 16 | Me7-em4 | |
| 17 | me8-em4 | |
| 18 | me8-em6 | |
| SC10 | 1 | me1-em5 |
| 2 | me2-em3 | |
| 3 | me2-em4 | |
| 4 | me2-em8 | |
| 5 | me3-em1 | |
| 6 | me3-em5 | |
| 7 | me3-em7 | |
| 8 | me4-em3 | |
| 9 | me5-em5 | |
| 10 | me5-em6 | |
| 11 | me6-em5 | |
| 12 | me7-em2 | |
| 13 | me7-em4 | |
| 13 | me8-em4 | |
| 15 | me8-em6 |
Percentage of fruit set induced by DMSO in cassava
| DMSO concentration (%) | SC5 | SC10 | SC8 | Total | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
| No. of flowers treated | No. of fruit set | Percentage of fruit set (%) | No. of flowers treated | No. of fruit set | Percentage of fruit set (%) | No. of flowers treated | No. of fruit set | Percentage of fruit set (%) | No. of flowers treated | No. of fruit set | Percentage of fruit set (%) | |
| 1.0 | 1787 | 10 | 0.28 | 1167 | 5 | 0.86 | 167 | 0 | 0 | 3121 | 15 | 0.48ABb |
| 1.5 | 1108 | 27 | 2.44 | 510 | 5 | 0.98 | 218 | 0 | 0 | 1836 | 32 | 1.74Aa |
| 2.0 | 1333 | 7 | 0.53 | 831 | 3 | 0.36 | 135 | 0 | 0 | 2299 | 10 | 0.43Bb |
| Total | 4228 | 44 | 1.04Aa | 2508 | 13 | 0.52Ab | 520 | 0 | 0Ab | 7256 | 57 | 0.79 |
| CK | 300 | 0 | 0 | 200 | 0 | 0 | 80 | 0 | 0 | 580 | 0 | 0 |
Different capital letters indicate significant difference at 0.01 level, different small letters indicate significant difference at 0.05 level.
Germination and identification of putative cassava apomictic seeds
| Cultivars | No. of seeds harvested | No. of geminated seedlings (%) | No. of apomictic plants identified (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| SC5 | 46 | 23 (50) | 3 (13.04) |
| SC10 | 24 | 11 (45.83) | 0 (0) |
Fig. 1Growth of the cassava seedlings obtained with DMSO application. A: seedlings 20 days after germination (true apomictic plants are indicated by the yellow arrows). B: seedlings transferred 35 days after germination.
Fig. 2Flow cytometric detection of nuclear DNA and chromosome count in young leaf of a cassava seedling obtained with DMSO application. A: flow cytometric histogram of the nuclear DNA content with a peak at channel 200 corresponding to the diploidy. B: mitotic metaphase chromosomes (2n = 2× = 36).
Fig. 3EST-SSR banding pattern of 34 DMSO-induced cassava progenies with primer combination CESR-0831 and CESR-0604. A: CESR-0831. ck SC5 female parent, sample 1–23 DMSO-induced SC5 progenies. B: CESR-0604. ck SC10 female parent, sample 1–11 DMSO-induced SC10 progenies.
Fig. 4Analysis of 34 DMSO-induced cassava progenies by SRAP with primer pair me3-em1, me4-em2 and me5-em4. A: me3-em1. ck SC5 female parent, sample 1–23 DMSO-induced SC5 progenies and the sample 2, 5 and 7 are from the apomictic plants. B: me4-em2. ck SC5 female parent, sample 1–23 DMSO-induced SC5 progenies and the sample 2, 5 and 7 are from the apomictic plants. C: me5-em4. ck SC10 female parent, sample 1–11 DMSO-induced SC10 progenies.