Literature DB >> 29875276

Long-term outcomes of treatment for unruptured intracranial aneurysms in South Korea: clipping versus coiling.

Young Deok Kim1, Jae Seung Bang1, Si Un Lee1, Won Joo Jeong1, O-Ki Kwon1, Seung Pil Ban1, Tac Keun Kim1, Seung Bin Kim1, Chang Wan Oh1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The long-term outcomes of endovascular coiling and surgical clipping for the treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms are unclear.
METHODS: We performed a nationwide retrospective cohort study using claims data from the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service on patients undergoing surgical clipping or endovascular coiling from 2008 to 2014. Inverse probability treatment weighting for average treatment effect on the treated and the multiple imputation method were used to balance covariates and handle missing values. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 7 years.
RESULTS: We identified 26 411 patients of whom 11 777 underwent surgical clipping and 14 634 underwent endovascular coiling. After adjustment with the use of inverse probability treatment weighting for average treatment effect on the treated, all-cause mortality rates at 7 years were 3.8% in the endovascular coiling group and 3.6% in the surgical clipping group (HR 1.05; 95% CI 0.86 to 1.28; P=0.60, log-rank test). The adjusted probabilities of aneurysm rupture at 7 years were 0.9% after endovascular coiling and 0.7% after surgical clipping (HR 0.9; 95% CI 0.61 to 1.34; P=0.63, log-rank test). The probabilities of retreatment at 7 years after adjustment were 4.9% in the endovascular coiling group and 3.2% in the surgical clipping group (HR 1.52; 95% CI 1.28 to 1.81; P<0.001, log-rank test).
CONCLUSIONS: All-cause mortality at 7 years was similar between the elective surgical clipping and endovascular coiling groups in patients with unruptured aneurysms who had no history of subarachnoid hemorrhage due to aneurysm rupture. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aneurysm

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29875276     DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-013757

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg        ISSN: 1759-8478            Impact factor:   5.836


  5 in total

1.  European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guidelines on management of unruptured intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  Nima Etminan; Diana Aguiar de Sousa; Cindy Tiseo; Romain Bourcier; Hubert Desal; Anttii Lindgren; Timo Koivisto; David Netuka; Simone Peschillo; Sabrina Lémeret; Avtar Lal; Mervyn DI Vergouwen; Gabriel Je Rinkel
Journal:  Eur Stroke J       Date:  2022-06-03

2.  Higher oscillatory shear index is related to aneurysm recanalization after coil embolization in posterior communicating artery aneurysms.

Authors:  Tackeun Kim; Chang Wan Oh; Jae Seung Bang; Seung Pil Ban; Si Un Lee; Young Deok Kim; O-Ki Kwon
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2020-10-10       Impact factor: 2.816

3.  Prediction of Intracranial Aneurysm Risk using Machine Learning.

Authors:  Jaehyuk Heo; Sang Jun Park; Si-Hyuck Kang; Chang Wan Oh; Jae Seung Bang; Tackeun Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Surgical Clipping Versus Endovascular Coiling in the Management of Intracranial Aneurysms.

Authors:  Rishab Belavadi; Sri Vallabh Reddy Gudigopuram; Ciri C Raguthu; Harini Gajjela; Iljena Kela; Chandra L Kakarala; Mohammad Hassan; Ibrahim Sange
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-12-17

5.  Endovascular coiling versus surgical clipping for the treatment of unruptured cerebral aneurysms: Direct comparison of procedure-related complications.

Authors:  Xiao-Kui Kang; Sheng-Fu Guo; Yi Lei; Wei Wei; Hui-Xin Liu; Li-Li Huang; Qun-Long Jiang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.817

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.