Literature DB >> 29875196

Malaria Diagnostic Practices in U.S. Laboratories in 2017.

Christopher Prestel1, Kathrine R Tan2, Francisca Abanyie3, Robert Jerris4, Julie R Gutman2.   

Abstract

In the United States, the gold standard for malaria diagnosis is microscopic blood smear examination. Because malaria is not endemic in the United States, diagnostic capabilities may be limited, causing delays in diagnosis and increased morbidity and mortality. A survey of the malaria diagnostic practices of U.S. laboratories was conducted from June to July 2017; members of the American Society for Microbiology's listserv received a questionnaire inquiring about malaria diagnostic test availability, techniques, and reporting. Results were assessed using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines for malaria diagnostics. After excluding incomplete and duplicate responses, responses representing 175 laboratories were included. Most labs (99%) received at least one specimen annually for malaria diagnosis, and 31% reported receiving only 1 to 10 specimens. The majority (74%) diagnosed five or fewer cases of malaria per year. Most (90%) performed blood smears on-site. Two-thirds (70%) provided initial blood smear results within 4 h. Although diagnostic testing for malaria was available 24/7 at 74% (141) of responding laboratories, only 12% (17) met criteria for analysis and reporting of malaria testing, significantly more than reported in a similar survey in 2010 (3%; P < 0.05). The majority of laboratories surveyed had the capability for timely diagnosis of malaria; few comply with CLSI guidelines. Inexperience may factor into this noncompliance; many laboratories see few to no cases of malaria per year. Although reported adherence to CLSI guidelines was higher than in 2010, there is a need to further improve laboratory compliance with recommendations.
Copyright © 2018 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CLSI guidelines; United States; diagnostic testing; malaria

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29875196      PMCID: PMC6062816          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00461-18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  17 in total

Review 1.  Update on Malaria Diagnostics and Test Utilization.

Authors:  Blaine A Mathison; Bobbi S Pritt
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Performance of the Now Malaria rapid diagnostic test with returned travellers: a 2-year retrospective study in a French teaching hospital.

Authors:  F Durand; B Crassous; H Fricker-Hidalgo; F Carpentier; J-P Brion; R Grillot; H Pelloux
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 8.067

3.  Spectrum of disease and relation to place of exposure among ill returned travelers.

Authors:  David O Freedman; Leisa H Weld; Phyllis E Kozarsky; Tamara Fisk; Rachel Robins; Frank von Sonnenburg; Jay S Keystone; Prativa Pandey; Martin S Cetron
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-01-12       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Malaria Surveillance - United States, 2013.

Authors:  Karen A Cullen; Kimberly E Mace; Paul M Arguin
Journal:  MMWR Surveill Summ       Date:  2016-03-04

5.  Diagnostic performance of rapid diagnostic tests versus blood smears for malaria in US clinical practice.

Authors:  William M Stauffer; Charles P Cartwright; Douglas A Olson; Billie Anne Juni; Charlotte M Taylor; Susan H Bowers; Kevan L Hanson; Jon E Rosenblatt; David R Boulware
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 9.079

6.  Imported malaria: prospective analysis of problems in diagnosis and management.

Authors:  K C Kain; M A Harrington; S Tennyson; J S Keystone
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 9.079

7.  State of malaria diagnostic testing at clinical laboratories in the United States, 2010: a nationwide survey.

Authors:  Francisca A Abanyie; Paul M Arguin; Julie Gutman
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 2.979

8.  Multiplex real-time quantitative PCR, microscopy and rapid diagnostic immuno-chromatographic tests for the detection of Plasmodium spp: performance, limit of detection analysis and quality assurance.

Authors:  Krishna Khairnar; Donald Martin; Rachel Lau; Filip Ralevski; Dylan R Pillai
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 2.979

9.  Malaria Surveillance - United States, 2015.

Authors:  Kimberly E Mace; Paul M Arguin; Kathrine R Tan
Journal:  MMWR Surveill Summ       Date:  2018-05-04

10.  GeoSentinel surveillance of illness in returned travelers, 2007-2011.

Authors:  Karin Leder; Joseph Torresi; Michael D Libman; Jakob P Cramer; Francesco Castelli; Patricia Schlagenhauf; Annelies Wilder-Smith; Mary E Wilson; Jay S Keystone; Eli Schwartz; Elizabeth D Barnett; Frank von Sonnenburg; John S Brownstein; Allen C Cheng; Mark J Sotir; Douglas H Esposito; David O Freedman
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  3 in total

1.  Malaria Surveillance - United States, 2017.

Authors:  Kimberly E Mace; Naomi W Lucchi; Kathrine R Tan
Journal:  MMWR Surveill Summ       Date:  2021-03-19

Review 2.  Evaluation of the sick returned traveler.

Authors:  Henry M Wu
Journal:  Semin Diagn Pathol       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 3.464

3.  Malaria Surveillance - United States, 2018.

Authors:  Kimberly E Mace; Naomi W Lucchi; Kathrine R Tan
Journal:  MMWR Surveill Summ       Date:  2022-09-02
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.