Literature DB >> 29875154

A tale of two cities: exploring the retail impact of flavoured tobacco restrictions in the twin cities of Minneapolis and Saint Paul, Minnesota.

Betsy Brock1, Samantha C Carlson1,2, Alicia Leizinger1, Joanne D'Silva3, Christine M Matter4, Barbara A Schillo3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Flavoured tobacco is increasingly popular with youth. The twin cities of Minneapolis and Saint Paul, Minnesota restricted the sale of flavoured tobacco to adult-only tobacco shops in an effort to reduce youth access and exposure to these products. This observational study explores the impact of these policies on the retail environment.
METHODS: Between November 2015 and April 2017, observational assessments were conducted at convenience and grocery stores preimplementation and postimplementation of flavoured tobacco restrictions in Minneapolis (n=41), Saint Paul (n=37) and the comparison city of Brooklyn Park, Minnesota (n=14).
RESULTS: After policy implementation, significantly fewer of the convenience and grocery stores sold flavoured tobacco in Minneapolis (85.4% vs 39.0%, p<0.001, n=41) and Saint Paul (97.3% vs 8.1%, p<0.001, n=37). The average proportion of tobacco inventory that was unflavoured increased significantly in Minneapolis (42.9%±2.7% vs 56.7%±3.1%, p=0.002) and Saint Paul (40.8%±2.5% vs 70.3%±1.9%, p<0.001). Flavoured tobacco was available at significantly fewer convenience and grocery stores in Minneapolis (39.0%, p<0.001) and Saint Paul (8.1%, p<0.001) than in the comparison city of Brooklyn Park (100%, n=14). Most retailers complied with these policies by removing flavoured tobacco from their shelves.
CONCLUSIONS: Policies that restrict the sale of flavoured tobacco to adult-only tobacco shops are associated with decreased availability of flavoured tobacco in convenience and grocery stores and increased proportion of tobacco inventory that is unflavoured. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2019. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  public policy; tobacco industry

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29875154     DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-054154

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tob Control        ISSN: 0964-4563            Impact factor:   7.552


  12 in total

1.  Content appealing to youth and spend characteristics of electronic cigarette video advertisements.

Authors:  Cosima Hoetger; Catherine S J Wall; Alyssa K Rudy; Nicole E Nicksic; Sohum M Bhatt; Nancy Y A Sey; Mishaal Khan; Destini Braxton; Andrew J Barnes; Caroline O Cobb
Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 2.341

2.  Young people's e-cigarette risk perceptions, policy attitudes, and past-month nicotine vaping in 30 U.S. cities.

Authors:  Erin A Vogel; Lisa Henriksen; Nina C Schleicher; Judith J Prochaska
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2021-10-09       Impact factor: 4.492

3.  Estimating the Potential Public Health Impact of Prohibiting Characterizing Flavors in Cigars throughout the US.

Authors:  Brian L Rostron; Catherine G Corey; Enver Holder-Hayes; Bridget K Ambrose
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Advancing Tobacco Control Through Point of Sale Policies, Providence, Rhode Island.

Authors:  Deborah N Pearlman; Jasmine A Arnold; Geri A Guardino; Erin Boles Welsh
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 2.830

5.  Flavored Tobacco Sales Prohibition (2009) and Noncigarette Tobacco Products in Retail Stores (2017), New York City.

Authors:  Shannon M Farley; Julia Sisti; John Jasek; Kevin R J Schroth
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Compliance with San Francisco's flavoured tobacco sales prohibition.

Authors:  Priyanka Vyas; Pamela Ling; Bob Gordon; Jennifer Callewaert; Alvin Dang; Derek Smith; Brittany Chan; Stanton Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 7.552

7.  Prior Daily Menthol Smokers More Likely to Quit 2 Years After a Menthol Ban Than Non-menthol Smokers: A Population Cohort Study.

Authors:  Michael Chaiton; Robert Schwartz; Joanna E Cohen; Eric Soule; Bo Zhang; Thomas Eissenberg
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 4.244

8.  Modelling retailer-based exemptions in flavoured tobacco sales restrictions: national estimates on the impact of product availability.

Authors:  Barbara A Schillo; Adam F Benson; Lauren Czaplicki; Andrew Anesetti-Rothermel; Elexis C Kierstead; Randall Simpson; Natasha C Phelps; Peter Herman; Chang Zhao; Shyanika W Rose
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Are California's Local Flavored Tobacco Sales Restrictions Effective in Reducing the Retail Availability of Flavored Tobacco Products? A Multicomponent Evaluation.

Authors:  Elizabeth Andersen-Rodgers; Xueying Zhang; Tam D Vuong; Liz Hendrix; Cheryl Edora; Rebecca J Williams; Lauren Groves; April Roeseler; Todd Rogers; David H Voelker; Nina C Schleicher; Trent O Johnson; Lisa Henriksen
Journal:  Eval Rev       Date:  2021-10-25

10.  Flavored Tobacco Sales Restrictions Reduce Tobacco Product Availability and Retailer Advertising.

Authors:  Louisa M Holmes; Lauren Kass Lempert; Pamela M Ling
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 4.614

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.