INTRODUCTION: Access to cognitive assessments for children living remotely is limited. Telehealth represents a potential cost- and time-effective solution. A pilot study was conducted to determine the feasibility of telehealth to assess cognitive function in children with learning difficulties. METHODS: Thirty-three children (median age = 9 years 11 months), recruited from the New South Wales (NSW) Centre for Effective Reading, underwent assessment of intellectual ability. Comparisons were made between the intellectual ability index scores obtained by a psychologist sitting face-to-face with the children and another psychologist via telehealth using a web-based platform, Coviu. RESULTS: The telehealth administration method yielded comparable results to the face-to-face method. Correlation analyses showed high associations between the testing methodologies on the intellectual ability indices (correlation coefficient range = 0.981-0.997). DISCUSSION: Findings indicate that telehealth may be an alternative to face-to-face cognitive assessment. Future work in a broader range of cognitive tests and wider range of clinical populations is warranted.
INTRODUCTION: Access to cognitive assessments for children living remotely is limited. Telehealth represents a potential cost- and time-effective solution. A pilot study was conducted to determine the feasibility of telehealth to assess cognitive function in children with learning difficulties. METHODS: Thirty-three children (median age = 9 years 11 months), recruited from the New South Wales (NSW) Centre for Effective Reading, underwent assessment of intellectual ability. Comparisons were made between the intellectual ability index scores obtained by a psychologist sitting face-to-face with the children and another psychologist via telehealth using a web-based platform, Coviu. RESULTS: The telehealth administration method yielded comparable results to the face-to-face method. Correlation analyses showed high associations between the testing methodologies on the intellectual ability indices (correlation coefficient range = 0.981-0.997). DISCUSSION: Findings indicate that telehealth may be an alternative to face-to-face cognitive assessment. Future work in a broader range of cognitive tests and wider range of clinical populations is warranted.
Authors: Ryan L Farmer; Ryan J McGill; Stefan C Dombrowski; Nicholas F Benson; Stephanie Smith-Kellen; Adam B Lockwood; Steven Powell; Christina Pynn; Terry A Stinnett Journal: Contemp Sch Psychol Date: 2020-06-02
Authors: William G Kronenberger; Caitlin J Montgomery; Shirley C Henning; Allison Ditmars; Courtney A Johnson; Carolyn J Herbert; David B Pisoni Journal: Am J Speech Lang Pathol Date: 2021-03-18 Impact factor: 2.408
Authors: Nadine A Kasparian; Anjali Sadhwani; Renee Sananes; Elizabeth Blumenfeld; Jennifer L Butcher; Adam R Cassidy; Stephany M Cox; Joslyn Kenowitz; Thomas A Miller; Jacqueline H Sanz; Kelly R Wolfe; Dawn Ilardi Journal: Cardiol Young Date: 2022-02-24 Impact factor: 1.093
Authors: Danielle M Ransom; Sakina M Butt; Emily K DiVirgilio; Charles D Cederberg; Kyle D Srnka; Colleen T Hess; Megan C Sy; Jennifer M Katzenstein Journal: Arch Clin Neuropsychol Date: 2020-11-19 Impact factor: 2.813
Authors: Brittany L Manning; Alexandra Harpole; Emily M Harriott; Kamila Postolowicz; Elizabeth S Norton Journal: J Speech Lang Hear Res Date: 2020-11-13 Impact factor: 2.297