| Literature DB >> 29874828 |
Matiullah Khan1,2,3, Zhenghua Lan4, Yi Zeng5.
Abstract
Due to the high formation energy of Indium interstitial defect in the TiO₂ lattice, the most probable location for Indium dopant is substitutional sites. Replacing Ti by In atom in the anatase TiO₂ shifted the absorption edge of TiO₂ towards visible regime. Indium doping tuned the band structure of TiO₂ via creating In 5p states. The In 5p states are successfully coupled with the O 2p states reducing the band gap. Increasing In doping level in TiO₂ improved the visible light absorption. Compensating the charge imbalance by oxygen vacancy provided compensated Indium doped TiO₂ model. The creation of oxygen vacancy widened the band gap, blue shifted the absorption edge of TiO₂ and declined the UV light absorption. The 2.08% In in TiO₂ is the optimal Indium doping concentration, providing suitable band structure for the photoelectrochemical applications and stable geometrical configuration among the simulated models. Our results provide a reasonable explanation for the improved photoactivity of Indium doped TiO₂.Entities:
Keywords: Indium doped TiO2; doping concentration; optical response; oxidation state
Year: 2018 PMID: 29874828 PMCID: PMC6025419 DOI: 10.3390/ma11060952
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Insertion of Indium atom at Ti site in anatase TiO2 network.
Bond lengths (averaged) of the simulated models.
| Bond Length | TiO2 | Ti16-1In1O32 | Ti16-2In2O32 | Ti16-2In2O31 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DO-Ti (Å) | 1.9651 | 1.9721 | 1.9846 | 1.9755 |
| DO-O (Å) | 2.7034 | 2.7152 | 2.6886 | 2.7547 |
| DO-In (Å) | --- | 2.1294 | 2.1707 | 2.1723 |
Figure 2Band structure of TiO2 and defect induced models: (a) TiO2; (b) Ti16-1In1O32; (c) Ti16-2In2O32; and (d) Ti16-2In2O31.
Band edge and Fermi level positions in different systems. The valence band maximum and conduction band minimum are represented by VBM and CBM, respectively.
| TiO2 | Ti16-1In1O32 | Ti16-2In2O32 | Ti16-2In2O31 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fermi level (eV) | Above VBM | 0.25 eV above VBM | 0.1 eV below VBM | 0.1 eV above VBM |
| VBM (eV) | 0 | −0.75 | 0.1 | −0.92 |
| CBM (eV) | 2.13 | 1.85 | 2.75 | 2.40 |
Figure 3The (a) total density of states and; (b) partial density of states.
Figure 4Optical response of the TiO2 and defect induced TiO2 models.