Literature DB >> 29874324

A Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare Heated Humidified High-Flow Nasal Cannulae with Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Postextubation in Premature Infants: Retraction.

Saleh Al-Alaiyan1.   

Abstract

[This retracts the article on p. 75 in vol. 2, PMID: 24049748.].

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 29874324      PMCID: PMC4608484          DOI: 10.4103/2249-4847.144767

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Neonatol        ISSN: 2249-4847


The article “A Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare Heated Humidified High-Flow Nasal Cannulae with Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Postextubation in Premature Infants”[1] that was published in the Journal of Clinical Neonatology | Vol. 2 | Issue 2 | April-June 2013 has been retracted due to a copyright issue raised by the author of the original article in the Journal of Pediatrics. A revised version of the above article has been published in a previous issue of Journal of Clinical Neonatology | Vol. 3 | Issue 3 | July-September 2014 on page 139 with the title “Heated Humidified High-Flow Nasal Cannulae: A Good Alternative to Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure”.[2]
  1 in total

1.  A randomized controlled trial to compare heated humidified high-flow nasal cannulae with nasal continuous positive airway pressure postextubation in premature infants.

Authors:  Lena Ignacio; Khalid Alfaleh
Journal:  J Clin Neonatol       Date:  2013-04
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.