Literature DB >> 29874190

Determination of optimal positive end-expiratory pressure based on respiratory compliance and electrical impedance tomography: a pilot clinical comparative trial.

Jan Karsten1, Nicolas Voigt1, Hans-Joerg Gillmann1, Thomas Stueber1.   

Abstract

There is no agreement on gold standard method for positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) titration. Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) may aid in finding the optimal PEEP level. In this pilot trial, we investigated potential differences in the suggested optimal PEEP (BestPEEP) as derived by respiratory compliance and EIT-derived parameters. We examined if compliance-derived PEEP differs with regard to the regional ventilation distribution in relation to atelectasis and hyperinflation. Measurements were performed during an incremental/decremental PEEP trial in 15 ventilated intensive care patients suffering from mild-to-moderate impairment of oxygenation due to sepsis, pneumonia, trauma and metabolic and ischemic disorders. Measurement agreement was analyzed using Bland-Altman plots. We observed a diversity of EIT-derived and compliance-based optimal PEEP in the evaluated patients. BestPEEPCompliance did not necessarily correspond to the BestPEEPODCL with the least regional overdistension and collapse. The collapsed area was significantly smaller when the overdistension/collapse index was used for PEEP definition (p=0.022). Our results showed a clinically relevant difference in the suggested optimal PEEP levels when using different parameters for PEEP titration. The compliance-derived PEEP level revealed a higher proportion of residual regional atelectasis as compared to EIT-based PEEP.

Entities:  

Keywords:  compliance; critical care; diagnostic imaging; mechanical ventilation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 29874190     DOI: 10.1515/bmt-2017-0103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Tech (Berl)        ISSN: 0013-5585            Impact factor:   1.411


  5 in total

1.  Mechanical Ventilation Guided by Electrical Impedance Tomography in Children With Acute Lung Injury.

Authors:  Isabel Rosemeier; Karl Reiter; Viola Obermeier; Gerhard K Wolf
Journal:  Crit Care Explor       Date:  2019-07-01

2.  Methods for Determination of Individual PEEP for Intraoperative Mechanical Ventilation Using a Decremental PEEP Trial.

Authors:  Felix Girrbach; Franziska Zeutzschel; Susann Schulz; Mirko Lange; Alessandro Beda; Antonio Giannella-Neto; Hermann Wrigge; Philipp Simon
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 4.964

3.  Effects of ultrasound-guided alveolar recruitment manoeuvres compared with sustained inflation or no recruitment manoeuvres on atelectasis in laparoscopic gynaecological surgery as assessed by ultrasonography: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Xiong-Zhi Wu; Hai-Mei Xia; Ping Zhang; Lei Li; Qiao-Hao Hu; Su-Ping Guo; Tian-Yuan Li
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 2.376

4.  The global inhomogeneity index assessed by electrical impedance tomography overestimates PEEP requirement in patients with ARDS: an observational study.

Authors:  Serge J H Heines; Sebastiaan A M de Jongh; Ulrich Strauch; Iwan C C van der Horst; Marcel C G van de Poll; Dennis C J J Bergmans
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 2.376

5.  Assessment of the Effect of Recruitment Maneuver on Lung Aeration Through Imaging Analysis in Invasively Ventilated Patients: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Charalampos Pierrakos; Marry R Smit; Laura A Hagens; Nanon F L Heijnen; Markus W Hollmann; Marcus J Schultz; Frederique Paulus; Lieuwe D J Bos
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 4.566

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.