Literature DB >> 29873828

User-based evaluation of applicability and usability of a wearable accelerometer device for detecting bilateral tonic-clonic seizures: A field study.

Pirgit Meritam1, Philippe Ryvlin2,3, Sándor Beniczky1,4.   

Abstract

Clinical validation studies of seizure detection devices conducted in epilepsy monitoring units (EMUs) can be biased by the artificial environment. We report a field (phase 4) study of a wearable accelerometer device (Epi-Care) that has previously been validated in EMUs for detecting bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (BTCS). Seventy-one patients using the device (or their caregivers) completed the modified Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire. Median time patients had been using the device was 15 months (range = 24 days-6 years). In 10% of cases, patients stopped using the device due to reasons related to the device. The median sensitivity (90%) and false alarm rate (0.1/d) were similar to what had been determined in EMUs. Patients and caregivers were overall satisfied with the device (median = 5.5 on the 7-point Likert scale), considered the technical aspects satisfactory, and considered the device comfortable and efficient. Adverse effects occurred in 11%, but were only mild: skin irritation at the wrist and interference with home electronic appliances. In 55% the device influenced the number of seizures logged into the seizure diary, and in 40% it contributed to fewer seizure-related injuries. This field study demonstrates the applicability and usability of the wearable accelerometer device for detecting BTCS. Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
© 2018 International League Against Epilepsy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  field study; phase 4; seizure detection; wearable accelerometer device

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29873828     DOI: 10.1111/epi.14051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epilepsia        ISSN: 0013-9580            Impact factor:   5.864


  7 in total

Review 1.  Wearables for Neurologic Conditions: Considerations for Our Patients and Research Limitations.

Authors:  Mia T Minen; Eric J Stieglitz
Journal:  Neurol Clin Pract       Date:  2021-08

Review 2.  The Prospects of Non-EEG Seizure Detection Devices in Dogs.

Authors:  Jos Bongers; Rodrigo Gutierrez-Quintana; Catherine Elizabeth Stalin
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-05-23

3.  Research protocol for the validation of a new portable technology for real-time continuous monitoring of Early Warning Score (EWS) in hospital practice and for an early-stage multistakeholder assessment.

Authors:  Stefania Manetti; Milena Vainieri; Elisa Guidotti; Sara Zuccarino; Francesca Ferré; Maria Sole Morelli; Michele Emdin
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Owner's Perception of Seizure Detection Devices in Idiopathic Epileptic Dogs.

Authors:  Jos Bongers; Rodrigo Gutierrez-Quintana; Catherine Elizabeth Stalin
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-12-09

Review 5.  Future opportunities for research in rescue treatments.

Authors:  James W Wheless; Daniel Friedman; Gregory L Krauss; Vikram R Rao; Michael R Sperling; Enrique Carrazana; Adrian L Rabinowicz
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 6.740

Review 6.  EVIDENCE Publication Checklist for Studies Evaluating Connected Sensor Technologies: Explanation and Elaboration.

Authors:  Christine Manta; Nikhil Mahadevan; Jessie Bakker; Simal Ozen Irmak; Elena Izmailova; Siyeon Park; Jiat-Ling Poon; Santosh Shevade; Sarah Valentine; Benjamin Vandendriessche; Courtney Webster; Jennifer C Goldsack
Journal:  Digit Biomark       Date:  2021-05-18

7.  Evaluation of a collar-mounted accelerometer for detecting seizure activity in dogs.

Authors:  Karen R Muñana; Julie A Nettifee; Emily H Griffith; Peter J Early; Nathanael C Yoder
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 3.333

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.