Literature DB >> 29873760

Supplementation of guanidinoacetic acid to pig diets: effects on performance, carcass characteristics, and meat quality.

Balachandar Jayaraman1, Kinh V La2, Huyen La2, Vinh Doan2, Eloisa M Carpena1, Meike Rademacher3, Girish Channarayapatna1.   

Abstract

Two studies were conducted to evaluate the effects of dietary supplementation of guanidinoacetic acid (GAA) on growth performance, carcass characteristics, and meat quality in pigs from wean to finish (Exp 1) and finishing pigs fed GAA at different time periods before slaughter (Exp 2). In Exp 1, a total of 360 weaned pigs (Duroc × [Landrace × Yorkshire]) with an average initial BW of 7.17 ± 0.03 kg were randomly distributed into 3 dietary treatments consisting of 10 replicates per treatment and 12 pigs (6 barrows and 6 gilts) per replicate. Dietary treatments were a control (CON; basal diet), a basal diet + 0.08% GAA (0.08% GAA); and a basal diet + 0.12% GAA (0.12% GAA). The duration of the experiment was 150 d. At the end of the experiment, 20 pigs (10 barrows and 10 gilts) from each treatment were slaughtered for measuring carcass characteristics and meat quality. In Exp 2, 1,440 finishing pigs [(Duroc × (Landrace × Yorkshire)), 56.15 ± 0.10 kg BW)] were randomly allocated to 4 treatments with 18 replicates (20 pigs per replicate). Dietary treatments were a control diet (CON; basal), a basal diet + 0.12% GAA fed 60 d before slaughter (T1), a basal diet + 0.12% GAA fed 40 d before slaughter (T2), and a basal diet + 0.12% GAA fed 25 d before slaughter (T3). Body weight was measured at the start (120 d of age) and at the end (180 d of age) of the experiment. At the end of the study, 144 pigs (72 barrows and 72 gilts) from 4 dietary treatments (36 pigs per treatment) were slaughtered for the determination of carcass and meat quality parameters. In Exp 1, 0.12 % GAA increased (P < 0.05) ADG and G:F during starter, grower, finisher, and the overall growth period (30 to 180 d of age). Pigs fed 0.12 % GAA had improved (P < 0.05) lean meat yield in comparison with CON. There was no interaction effect among GAA supplementation and sex of the pigs. Meat quality was not affected by GAA supplementation in pigs. In Exp 2, the final BW, ADG, and lean yield of the pigs fed T1 were higher (P < 0.05) than CON and those fed T3. The carcass back-fat thickness of T1 was lower (P < 0.05) than CON. In conclusion, 0.12% GAA improved the growth performance and lean meat yield in pigs from wean to finish. Finishing pigs fed diets supplemented with 0.12% GAA 60 d before slaughter improved ADG, feed efficiency, and lean meat yield and reduced back-fat thickness compared with those fed GAA unsupplemented diets.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29873760      PMCID: PMC6095247          DOI: 10.1093/jas/sky137

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  14 in total

1.  Reference methods for the assessment of physical characteristics of meat.

Authors:  K O Honikel
Journal:  Meat Sci       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 5.209

2.  In vitro and in vivo studies of creatine monohydrate supplementation to Duroc and Landrace pigs.

Authors:  J F Young; H C Bertram; P K Theil; A-G D Petersen; K A Poulsen; M Rasmussen; A Malmendal; N C Nielsen; M Vestergaard; N Oksbjerg
Journal:  Meat Sci       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Creatine monohydrate supplementation and the quality of fresh pork in normal and halothane carrier pigs.

Authors:  R J Maddock; B S Bidner; S N Carr; F K McKeith; E P Berg; J W Savell
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Phenotypic and genetic parameters for longissimus muscle fiber characteristics in relation to growth, carcass, and meat quality traits in large white pigs.

Authors:  C Larzul; L Lefaucheur; P Ecolan; J Gogué; A Talmant; P Sellier; P Le Roy; G Monin
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 5.  Creatine and creatinine metabolism.

Authors:  M Wyss; R Kaddurah-Daouk
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 37.312

6.  Supplementation of guanidinoacetic acid to broiler diets: effects on performance, carcass characteristics, meat quality, and energy metabolism.

Authors:  J Michiels; L Maertens; J Buyse; A Lemme; M Rademacher; N A Dierick; S De Smet
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Dietary guanidino acetic acid is an efficacious replacement for arginine for young chicks.

Authors:  R N Dilger; K Bryant-Angeloni; R L Payne; A Lemme; C M Parsons
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Digestibility and metabolism of dietary guanidino acetic acid fed to broilers.

Authors:  J Tossenberger; M Rademacher; K Németh; V Halas; A Lemme
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Creatine synthesis is a major metabolic process in neonatal piglets and has important implications for amino acid metabolism and methyl balance.

Authors:  John T Brosnan; Enoka P Wijekoon; Lori Warford-Woolgar; Nathalie L Trottier; Margaret E Brosnan; Janet A Brunton; Robert F P Bertolo
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 4.798

Review 10.  Creatine in humans with special reference to creatine supplementation.

Authors:  P D Balsom; K Söderlund; B Ekblom
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 11.136

View more
  7 in total

1.  Guanidine acetic acid supplementation altered plasma and tissue free amino acid profiles in finishing pigs.

Authors:  Yiyan Cui; Zhimei Tian; Miao Yu; Dun Deng; Huijie Lu; Min Song; Xianyong Ma; Limin Wang
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2022-06-07

2.  Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of guanidinoacetic acid for all animal species (Alzchem Trostberg GmbH).

Authors:  Vasileios Bampidis; Giovanna Azimonti; Maria de Lourdes Bastos; Henrik Christensen; Birgit Dusemund; Mojca Fašmon Durjava; Maryline Kouba; Marta López-Alonso; Secundino López Puente; Francesca Marcon; Baltasar Mayo; Alena Pechová; Mariana Petkova; Fernando Ramos; Yolanda Sanz; Roberto Edoardo Villa; Ruud Woutersen; Jürgen Gropp; Montserrat Anguita; Jaume Galobart; Jordi Ortuño Casanova; Fabiola Pizzo; Jordi Tarrés-Call
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2022-05-05

3.  Supplementation of guanidinoacetic acid and rumen-protected methionine increased growth performance and meat quality of Tan lambs.

Authors:  Jian Hao Zhang; Hai Hai Li; Gui Jie Zhang; Ying Hui Zhang; Bo Liu; Shuai Huang; Jessie Guyader; Rong Zhen Zhong
Journal:  Anim Biosci       Date:  2022-04-30

4.  Guanidine acetic acid exhibited greater growth performance in younger (13-30 kg) than in older (30-50 kg) lambs under high-concentrate feedlotting pattern.

Authors:  Wen-Juan Li; Qi-Chao Wu; Zhao-Yang Cui; Yao-Wen Jiang; Ailiyasi Aisikaer; Fan Zhang; He-Wei Chen; Wei-Kang Wang; Yan-Lu Wang; Liang-Kang Lv; Feng-Liang Xiong; Ying-Yi Liu; Sheng-Li Li; Hong-Jian Yang
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-08-04

5.  Dietary guanidinoacetic acid supplementation improves water holding capacity and lowers free amino acid concentration of fresh meat in finishing pigs fed with various dietary protein levels.

Authors:  Lu Wang; Yubo Wang; Doudou Xu; Linjuan He; Xiaoyan Zhu; Jingdong Yin
Journal:  Anim Nutr       Date:  2022-07-14

6.  Effects of Dietary Guanidinoacetic Acid on the Feed Efficiency, Blood Measures, and Meat Quality of Jinjiang Bulls.

Authors:  Zengmin Li; Huan Liang; Junping Xin; Lanjiao Xu; Meifa Li; Hanjing Yu; Wenjing Zhang; Yu Ge; Yanjiao Li; Mingren Qu
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-07-09

7.  Effects of dietary guanidinoacetic acid on growth performance, guanidinoacetic acid absorption and creatine metabolism of lambs.

Authors:  Shiqi Zhang; Changjiang Zang; Jun Pan; Chen Ma; Caidie Wang; Xiaobin Li; Wenjie Cai; Kailun Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.