Literature DB >> 29873282

Comparison of 3 Ways of Dissecting the Pancreatoduodenectomy Specimen and Their Impact in the Lymph Node Count and the Lymph Node Metastatic Ratio.

Leonardo S Lino-Silva1, Rosa A Salcedo-Hernández1, Patricia Segales-Rojas1, César Zepeda-Najar2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lymph node metastasis (LNM) is a strong prognostic factor in the cancer of the pancreatobiliary tree, but it is influenced by the number of lymph nodes (LNs). The lymph node ratio (LNR) is considered a more reliable factor than the number of LNM. The aim was to examine the LN retrieval and the LNR of 3 pathologic work-up strategies.
METHODS: Pancreaticoduodenectomies (n = 165) were analyzed comparing 3 pathological dissection techniques, classified as "control," "Verbeke method," and "Adsay method" groups.
RESULTS: The mean of the dissected LNs and the number of cases with >20 LNs were superior in the Adsay method group, compared with the other groups ( P < .001). The LNR was different between the Adsay and Verbeke groups (0.144 vs 0.069, P = .032). The median of the 3 positive LNs was associated with decreased survival compared with an absence of LNM (3-year specific survival of 48% vs 22%, P = .011). In the multivariate analysis, LNM (hazard ratio = 6.148, 95% confidence interval = 2.02-8.1, P = .042) and the evaluation of >15 LNs (hazard ratio = 12.52, 95% confidence interval = 5.51-21.01, P = .001) were independent predictors of survival.
CONCLUSION: The Adsay technique for LN retrieval was associated with a better LN count, more cases with LNM, and an LNR >0.1.

Entities:  

Keywords:  lymph node ratio; lymph nodes; pancreas cancer; pancreatoduodenectomy; survival

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29873282     DOI: 10.1177/1066896918780343

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 1066-8969            Impact factor:   1.271


  2 in total

1.  Towards a More Standardized Approach to Pathologic Reporting of Pancreatoduodenectomy Specimens for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Cross-continental and Cross-specialty Survey From the Pancreatobiliary Pathology Society Grossing Working Group.

Authors:  Deepti Dhall; Jiaqi Shi; Daniela S Allende; Kee-Taek Jang; Olca Basturk; Volkan Adsay; Grace E Kim
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 6.298

2.  Whipple Grossing in the Era of New Staging: Should We Standardize?

Authors:  Jiaqi Shi; Olca Basturk
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-29
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.