Literature DB >> 29873039

Task preparation as a mnemonic: The benefits of drawing (and not drawing).

Jeffrey D Wammes1, Brady R T Roberts2, Myra A Fernandes2.   

Abstract

Creating a visual representation of an item through drawing affords that item a substantive memory benefit, relative to several control tasks. Recent findings demonstrate the robustness of this drawing effect across several stimulus classes, irrespective of encoding time, setting, age group, or memory measure. The advantage for drawn information has been attributed to the integrated contributions of at least three components of visual production through drawing, which can independently facilitate memory: elaborative, motoric, and pictorial. In the current work, we investigated the importance of the elaborative process one must engage in while preparing to draw, and directly tested whether this generative period alone was sufficient to improve memory. Participants were prompted to either draw or write out presented words, and were provided with a 1- or 2-s preparatory period prior to completing the prompted task. Critically, on a subset of the trials, participants were prevented from completing the prompted task. There was strong evidence in support of better memory for drawn items, which replicates the drawing effect commonly observed in prior work. Interestingly, following prompts to draw, there was also a reliable memory benefit of the preparatory period alone. In other words, simply engaging in the elaborative process of preparing to draw (i.e., without completing the drawing) was enough to produce a reliable increase in later memory relative to actually writing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drawing; Episodic memory; Perceptual learning; Recognition

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29873039     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-018-1477-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  11 in total

1.  Encoding information for future action: memory for to-be-performed tasks versus memory for to-be-recalled tasks.

Authors:  A Koriat; H Ben-Zur; A Nussbaum
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1990-11

2.  The drawing effect: Evidence for reliable and robust memory benefits in free recall.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Wammes; Melissa E Meade; Myra A Fernandes
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 2.143

3.  Why can't most people draw what they see?

Authors:  D J Cohen; S Bennett
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Learning terms and definitions: Drawing and the role of elaborative encoding.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Wammes; Melissa E Meade; Myra A Fernandes
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2017-09

5.  New evidence on the nature of the encoding of action events.

Authors:  L Bäckman; L G Nilsson; D Chalom
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1986-07

6.  Motor programme information as a separable memory unit.

Authors:  J Engelkamp; H D Zimmer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1984

7.  Prerequisites for lack of age differences in memory performance.

Authors:  L Bäckman; L G Nilsson
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.645

8.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.

Authors:  J G Snodgrass; M Vanderwart
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1980-03

9.  Creating a recollection-based memory through drawing.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Wammes; Melissa E Meade; Myra A Fernandes
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Drawing as an Encoding Tool: Memorial Benefits in Younger and Older Adults.

Authors:  Melissa E Meade; Jeffrey D Wammes; Myra A Fernandes
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 1.645

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.