| Literature DB >> 29872647 |
Ju-Won Kim1, You-Young Jo2, Hae Yong Kweon2, Dae-Won Kim3, Seong-Gon Kim4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate the changes in gene expression after incubation of cells with proteins released from different silk mat layers.Entities:
Keywords: Angiogenesis inducing agents; Inflammation; Silk
Year: 2018 PMID: 29872647 PMCID: PMC5968019 DOI: 10.1186/s40902-018-0149-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg ISSN: 2288-8101
Fig. 1A sigma plot for each group. The gene expression ratio between saline control and each silk mat layer is shown as a single spot. Most gene data were collected on the line having inclination of 1.0. The number of genes that underwent more than 2-fold changes in expression was much greater in layer 1 and 4 groups than in layer 2 and 3 groups
Fig. 2A gene tree with cluster analysis. The genes associated with inflammation and angiogenesis were highly expressed in layer 1 and 4 groups at 2 h. The elevated expression of some genes persisted until 8 h
Summary of microarray results
| Gene | Observation | Layer 1 | Layer 2 | Layer 3 | Layer 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 2 h | − 0.731 | 0.450 | −1.961* | − 0.247 |
| 8 h | − 2.731* | − 3.140* | − 0.591 | − 2.441* | |
|
| 2 h | 0.483 | − 0.720 | 0.180 | 0.802 |
| 8 h | 1.772 | − 0.001 | 0.575 | 0.640 | |
|
| 2 h | − 3.106* | − 3.101* | − 2.943* | − 2.953* |
| 8 h | 0.087 | 0.067 | − 0.002 | 0.246 | |
|
| 2 h | − 0.087 | − 0.083 | 0.048 | 0.066 |
| 8 h | 0.364 | 2.300* | 2.145* | 0.484 | |
|
| 2 h | − 3.857* | − 4.213* | − 3.848* | − 4.119* |
| 8 h | − 0.126 | − 0.067 | − 0.157 | 0.157 | |
|
| 2 h | 1.435* | − 0.641 | 0.023 | 0.419 |
| 8 h | − 0.023 | − 0.599 | − 0.518 | − 0.817 | |
|
| 2 h | 3.001* | 0.067 | 0.269 | 3.102* |
| 8 h | 3.233* | − 0.308 | − 0.107 | 2.993* | |
|
| 2 h | 5.252* | 0.250 | 0.162 | 5.356* |
| 8 h | 5.676* | 0.058 | − 0.080 | 5.085* | |
|
| 2 h | 1.236* | − 0.134 | − 0.168 | 1.298* |
| 8 h | 3.463* | − 0.054 | 0.106 | 3.106* | |
|
| 2 h | − 0.864 | − 2.123* | − 2.006* | − 0.511 |
| 8 h | 2.714* | − 0.113 | 0.436 | 1.954* | |
|
| 2 h | 1.630* | 0.173 | − 0.063 | 1.514* |
| 8 h | 1.171* | − 0.195 | − 0.162 | 1.021* | |
|
| 2 h | 2.385* | 0.166 | 0.241 | 2.155* |
| 8 h | 2.455* | − 0.218 | − 0.137 | 2.021* | |
|
| 2 h | 1.462* | 0.086 | 0.026 | 1.301* |
| 8 h | 1.443* | − 0.170 | − 0.110 | 1.182* | |
|
| 2 h | 2.231* | − 0.084 | − 0.254 | 2.119* |
| 8 h | 3.420* | 0.378 | 0.446 | 2.957* | |
|
| 2 h | 4.117* | 3.730* | 0.666 | − 0.270 |
| 8 h | − 3.989* | − 4.493* | − 3.257* | − 3.897* | |
|
| 2 h | 3.949* | 2.108* | 4.070* | 2.147* |
| 8 h | − 0.630 | − 0.570 | − 0.704 | 1.458* |
*P < 0.05 when compared to the saline-treated control
Fgf fibroblast growth factor, Col collagen, Igf insulin-like growth factor, Hif hypoxia-inducible factor, Il interleukin, Mmp matrix metalloproteinase, Pdgf platelet-derived growth factor, Tnf tumor necrosis factor
Fig. 3The results of quantitative reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) analysis of selected genes. The expression of Il1β, Il18, and Tnfα at 2 and 8 h was significantly higher in layer 1 and 4 groups than in layer 2 and 3 groups (P < 0.05). The expression of Il1β and Tnfα at 24 h was significantly higher in layer 1 and 4 groups than in layer 2 and 3 groups (P < 0.05)