| Literature DB >> 29872442 |
Seon-Hee Kim1, Myong-Suk Cho1, Pan Li2, Seung-Chul Kim1.
Abstract
Alternating glacial and interglacial periods during the Quaternary have dramatically affected the distribution and population genetic structure of plant and animal species throughout the northern hemisphere. Surprisingly, little is known about the post-glacial recolonization history of wetland herbaceous perennials that are widely distributed in the understory of deciduous or mixed deciduous-evergreen forests in eastern North America. In this study, we investigated infraspecific variation among 32 populations of skunk cabbage, Symplocarpus foetidus, to test the hypothesis that the extant species diversity of skunk cabbage is the result of a post-glacial range expansion from southern refugia during the Quaternary Ice Age. A total of 4041 base pairs (bp) of the chloroplast intergenic spacer region (cpDNA) was sequenced from 485 individuals sampled from glaciated (18 populations, 275 individuals) and unglaciated (14 populations, 210 individuals) regions east and west of the Appalachian Mountains. Haplotype number, haplotype diversity, and nucleotide diversity were calculated, and genetic variation within and among populations was assessed by analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA). The geographic pattern of genetic differentiation was further investigated with a spatial analysis of molecular variance (SAMOVA). A total of eight haplotypes and three genetic groups (SAMOVA) were recovered and a much higher haplotype number (eight haplotypes) and haplotype diversity (0.7425) was observed in unglaciated compared to glaciated populations (five haplotypes, haplotype diversity = 0.6099). All haplotypes found in glaciated regions represented a subset of haplotypes found in unglaciated regions. Haplotypes of S. foetidus likely diverged during the Tertiary (mid-Miocene and late Pliocene), predating the last glacial maximum (LGM). Predictions based on ecological niche modeling (ENM) suggested that there was considerably less suitable habitat for skunk cabbage during the LGM, and the habitat range was further south compared to the current distribution. Reduced variation and a subset of haplotypes in glaciated regions suggest a founder effect associated with range expansion via long-distance seed dispersal. Our results do not support the "Driftless Area" scenario for the northern refugium, rather the data suggest a "Northeastern" refugium near the southernmost extent of the LGM.Entities:
Keywords: Araceae; Symplocarpus foetidus; eastern North America; ecological niche modeling; glaciation cycles; phylogeography; skunk cabbage
Year: 2018 PMID: 29872442 PMCID: PMC5972301 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00648
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
Figure 1Geographic distribution of eight haplotypes of Symplocarpus foetidus across 32 collection sites in eastern North America. Color proportion in each pie chart represent haplotype frequencies. Dotted line indicates approximate southern boundary of Last Glacial Maximum (Mickelson and Colgan, 2003).
Populations of Symplocarpus foetidus sampled in this study.
| DE1 | USA | Delaware | Felton, Santa Cruz County | 38°59′25.4″N | 10 | H8 (10) |
| MD1 | USA | Maryland | Frederick County | 39°22′05.4″N | 20 | H3 (2) |
| MD2 | USA | Maryland | 13501-14099 Locker Rd. | 39°40′53.6″N | 10 | H1 (10) |
| NC1 | USA | North Carolina | Asheville, Buncombe County | 35°36′48.3″N | 20 | H2 (5) |
| NJ1 | USA | New Jersey | Wall Township, Monmouth County | 40°09′40.8″N | 10 | H2 (8) |
| NJ2 | USA | New Jersey | Matawan, Monmouth County | 40°26′14.6″N | 10 | H3 (9) |
| NY1 | USA | New York | Nassau County | 40°40′41.8″N | 10 | H3 (9) |
| PA1 | USA | Pennsylvania | Harrisburg, Dauphin County | 40°18′38.0″N | 20 | H3 (15) |
| PA2 | USA | Pennsylvania | Fayetteville, Franklin County | 39°54′38.1″N | 10 | H6 (1) |
| TN1 | USA | Tennessee | Johnson County | 36°23′38.9″N | 14 | H2 (14) |
| VA2 | USA | Virginia | Totuskey Creek, Richmond County | 37°54′29.9″N | 20 | H8 (20) |
| VA3 | USA | Virginia | Blacksburg, Montgomery County | 37°11′51.2″N | 20 | H2 (20) |
| WV1 | USA | West Virginia | Greenbrier River Trail | 38°14′05.0″N | 20 | H1 (20) |
| WV2 | USA | West Virginia | King wood old shore camp | 39°28′22.9″N | 16 | H1 (13) |
| CT1 | USA | Connecticut | Hamden, New Haven County | 41°45′11.2″N | 10 | H3 (8) |
| IL1 | USA | Illinois | 61831, Collison | 40°14′34.2″N | 20 | H1 (20) |
| IL2 | USA | Illinois | Sugar Grove, Kane County | 41°47′04.6″N | 20 | H1 (20) |
| IN1 | USA | Indiana | Bristol, Elkhart County | 41°43′18.9″N | 20 | H1 (20) |
| IN2 | USA | Indiana | Anderson, Madison County | 40°05′50.4″N | 20 | H1 (20) |
| MA1 | USA | Massachusetts | Georgetown, Essex County | 42°42′06.6″N | 10 | H1 (3) |
| MA2 | USA | Massachusetts | Amherst, Hampshire County | 42°18′21.6″N | 10 | H3 (10) |
| ME1 | USA | Maine | provided by Chris Campbell (University of Maine) | NA | 10 | H3 (10) |
| MI1 | USA | Michigan | 8754 Coleman Rd. | 42°46′21.8″N | 20 | H8 (20) |
| MI2 | USA | Michigan | Augusta, Kalamazoo County | 42°21′47.0″N | 20 | H1 (20) |
| NY2 | USA | New York | Nassau County | 42°22′34.0″N | 10 | H3 (10) |
| OH1 | USA | Ohio | Troy, Miami County | 40°00′58.9″N | 20 | H1 (20) |
| OH2 | USA | Ohio | Brukner, Ashtabula County | 41°53′23.9″N | 20 | H8 (20) |
| OH3 | USA | Ohio | Fairfield County | 39°38′19.3″N | 20 | H8 (20) |
| WI1 | USA | Wisconsin | 2316 Whiting Rd, Stevens Point | 44°29′18.0″N | 20 | H1 (20) |
| WI2 | USA | Wisconsin | Merrimac, Sauk County | 43°24′35.2″N | 10 | H1 (10) |
| NB1 | CANADA | New Brunswick | Stock Farm Road | 45°26′19.4″N | 2 | H3 (2) |
| ON1 | CANADA | Ontario | Thunder Bay | 48°24′59.3″N | 13 | H2 (13) |
Vouchers were deposited at Ha Eun Herbarium (SKK) of Sungkyunkwan University. N/I, Number of individuals sampled; NA, not available. Haplotype designation was based on Table .
Distribution of haplotypes in Symplocarpus foetidus among individuals, populations, and glaciated/unglaciated regions of eastern North America.
| H1 | 196 | 40.4 | 12 | 37.5 | IL1, IL2, | Glaciated and |
| H2 | 60 | 12.3 | 5 | 15.6 | Glaciated and | |
| H3 | 79 | 16.2 | 11 | 34.3 | CT1, MA2, | Glaciated and |
| H4 | 1 | 0.20 | 1 | 3.12 | ||
| H5 | 1 | 0.20 | 1 | 3.12 | ||
| H6 | 1 | 0.20 | 1 | 3.12 | ||
| H7 | 3 | 0.61 | 2 | 6.25 | CT1, | Glaciated and |
| H8 | 144 | 29.6 | 12 | 37.5 | Glaciated and |
Unglaciated populations are in italics. CT, Connecticut; DE, Delaware; IL, Illinois; IN, Indiana; MA, Massachusetts; MD, Maryland; ME, Maine; MI, Michigan; NB, New Brunswick; NC, North Carolina; NJ, New Jersey; NY, New York; OH, Ohio; ON, Ontario; PA, Pennsylvania; TN, Tennessee; VA, Virginia; WI, Wisconsin; WV, West Virginia
Summary of cpDNA variation for 32 populations of eastern North American S. foetidus.
| DE1 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 0.0000 ± 0.0000 | 0.0000 ± 0.0000 | 0.00000 | 1.00000 | 0.00000 | N.A. |
| MD1 | 20 | 2 | 10 | 0.1895 ± 0.1081 | 0.00047 ± 0.000313 | −1.12727 | 0.15000 | 5.11332 | 0.97200 |
| MD2 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 0.0000 ± 0.0000 | 0.0000 ± 0.0000 | 0.00000 | 1.00000 | 0.00000 | N.A. |
| NC1 | 20 | 2 | 11 | 0.3947 ± 0.1006 | 0.001079 ± 0.000622 | 1.40025 | 0.92100 | 9.64331 | 0.99900 |
| NJ1 | 10 | 3 | 10 | 0.3778 ± 0.1813 | 0.000574 ± 0.000387 | −1.47308 | 0.07000 | 2.35538 | 0.89200 |
| NJ2 | 10 | 2 | 10 | 0.2000 ± 0.1541 | 0.000497 ± 0.000345 | −1.90129 | 0.01000 | 3.98898 | 0.95900 |
| NY1 | 10 | 2 | 10 | 0.2000 ± 0.1541 | 0.000497 ± 0.000345 | −1.90129 | 0.00400 | 3.98898 | 0.94800 |
| PA1 | 20 | 4 | 11 | 0.4316 ± 0.1262 | 0.000820 ± 0.000491 | −0.07891 | 0.52600 | 3.57424 | 0.94600 |
| PA2 | 10 | 2 | 5 | 0.2000 ± 0.1541 | 0.000248 ± 0.000206 | −1.66706 | 0.03300 | 2.19722 | 0.82200 |
| TN1 | 14 | 1 | 0 | 0.0000 ± 0.0000 | 0.0000 ± 0.0000 | 0.00000 | 1.00000 | 0.00000 | N.A. |
| VA2 | 20 | 1 | 0 | 0.0000 ± 0.0000 | 0.0000 ± 0.0000 | 0.00000 | 1.00000 | 0.00000 | N.A. |
| VA3 | 20 | 1 | 0 | 0.0000 ± 0.0000 | 0.0000 ± 0.0000 | 0.00000 | 1.00000 | 0.00000 | N.A. |
| WV1 | 20 | 1 | 0 | 0.0000 ± 0.0000 | 0.0000 ± 0.0000 | 0.00000 | 1.00000 | 0.00000 | N.A. |
| WV2 | 16 | 2 | 4 | 0.3250 ± 0.1251 | 0.000323 ± 0.000238 | 0.24535 | 0.64800 | 3.43030 | 0.93700 |
| 210 | 8 | 13 | 0.7425 ± 0.0122 | 0.001385 ± 0.000739 | 3.26287 | 0.99900 | 10.05523 | 0.97600 | |
| CT1 | 10 | 2 | 8 | 0.3556 ± 0.1591 | 0.000707 ± 0.000459 | 0.02480 | 0.53200 | 5.18801 | 0.98600 |
| IL1 | 20 | 1 | 0 | 0.0000 ± 0.0000 | 0.0000 ± 0.0000 | 0.00000 | 1.00000 | 0.00000 | N.A. |
| IL2 | 20 | 1 | 0 | 0.0000 ± 0.0000 | 0.0000 ± 0.0000 | 0.00000 | 1.00000 | 0.00000 | N.A. |
| IN1 | 20 | 1 | 0 | 0.0000 ± 0.0000 | 0.0000 ± 0.0000 | 0.00000 | 1.00000 | 0.00000 | N.A. |
| IN2 | 20 | 1 | 0 | 0.0000 ± 0.0000 | 0.0000 ± 0.0000 | 0.00000 | 1.00000 | 0.00000 | N.A. |
| MA1 | 10 | 2 | 10 | 0.4667 ± 0.1318 | 0.001159 ± 0.000702 | 1.40202 | 0.93600 | 7.27204 | 0.99900 |
| MA2 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 0.0000 ± 0.0000 | 0.0000 ± 0.0000 | 0.00000 | 1.00000 | 0.00000 | N.A. |
| ME1 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 0.0000 ± 0.0000 | 0.0000 ± 0.0000 | 0.00000 | 1.00000 | 0.00000 | N.A. |
| MI1 | 20 | 1 | 0 | 0.0000 ± 0.0000 | 0.0000 ± 0.0000 | 0.00000 | 1.00000 | 0.00000 | N.A. |
| MI2 | 20 | 1 | 0 | 0.0000 ± 0.0000 | 0.0000 ± 0.0000 | 0.00000 | 1.00000 | 0.00000 | N.A. |
| NY2 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 0.0000 ± 0.0000 | 0.0000 ± 0.0000 | 0.00000 | 1.00000 | 0.00000 | N.A. |
| OH1 | 20 | 1 | 0 | 0.0000 ± 0.0000 | 0.0000 ± 0.0000 | 0.00000 | 1.00000 | 0.00000 | N.A. |
| OH2 | 20 | 1 | 0 | 0.0000 ± 0.0000 | 0.0000 ± 0.0000 | 0.00000 | 1.00000 | 0.00000 | N.A. |
| OH3 | 20 | 1 | 0 | 0.0000 ± 0.0000 | 0.0000 ± 0.0000 | 0.00000 | 1.00000 | 0.00000 | N.A. |
| WI1 | 20 | 1 | 0 | 0.0000 ± 0.0000 | 0.0000 ± 0.0000 | 0.00000 | 1.00000 | 0.00000 | N.A. |
| WI2 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 0.0000 ± 0.0000 | 0.0000 ± 0.0000 | 0.00000 | 1.00000 | 0.00000 | N.A. |
| NB1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0.0000 ± 0.0000 | 0.0000 ± 0.0000 | 0.00000 | 1.00000 | 0.00000 | N.A. |
| ON1 | 13 | 1 | 0 | 0.0000 ± 0.0000 | 0.0000 ± 0.0000 | 0.00000 | 1.00000 | 0.00000 | N.A. |
| 275 | 5 | 12 | 0.6099 ± 0.0230 | 0.001124 ± 0.000614 | 3.07348 | 0.99800 | 13.25031 | 0.99000 | |
Hd, haplotype diversity; π, nucleotide diversity.
Figure 2TCS haplotype network of eight haplotypes found in Symplocarpus foetidus. The size of each circle is proportional to relative haplotype frequency. The cross stripes patterned portion represents the individuals sampled from the glaciated region. Three haplotypes in black squares are S. renifolius from Japan (SR1, SR7, and SR27).
Figure 3Chronogram of the subfamily Orontioideae constructed with BEAST. Calibrated node is indicated by the asterisk. Gray and pink bars indicate 95% HPD intervals for nodes of particular interest, with ages and 95% HPD given (in millions of years) above the bars. Haplotype numbers and color codes correspond to those in other Figures. PI/PI, Pliocene/Pleistocene; QU, Quaternary.
Figure 4Pairwise haplotype mismatch distributions for populations of S. foetidus. Graphs show (A) complete data set, (B) haplogroup 1, (C) haplogroup 2, (D) SAMOVA group 1, (E) SAMOVA group 2, and (F) SAMOVA group 3.
Neutrality and population expansion tests for Symplocarpus foetidus.
| 32 populations 485 individuals | −0.05754 | −0.72691 | 0.14185 | 0.25993 | 0.06967 |
| Haplogroup 1 | −0.06894 | −0.31848 | 0.45740 | 0.20897 | 0.07715 |
| Haplogroup 2 | −0.01666 | −0.07118 | 0.00387 | 0.87568 | 0.09545 |
| Mean | −0.0428 | −0.19483 | 0.23064 | 0.54233 | 0.0863 |
| SAMOVA group 1 | −0.01676 | −0.10160 | 0.01681 | 0.74447 | 0.08620 |
| SAMOVA group 2 | 0.00332 | −0.21136 | 0.00686 | 0.19890 | 0.08199 |
| SAMOVA group 3 | −0.09140 | −0.19409 | 0.02860 | 0.62385 | 0.09774 |
| Mean | −0.03495 | −0.16901 | 0.01742 | 0.52241 | 0.08864 |
Tajima's D, Fu's Fs statistic, Sum of Squared deviation (SSD), and Harpending's Raggedness index (RI), Ramos-Onsins and Rozas (R.
Significant at P < 0.01.
Significant at P < 0.001.
Not significant.
Figure 5Pearson correlation coefficients between genetic diversity estimates and latitudinal location. (A) haplotype stability and haplotype diversity, (B) haplotype stability and nucleotide diversity, (C) habitat stability and private haplotypes, (D) latitude and habitat stability, (E) latitude and haplotype diversity, (F) latitude and nucleotide diversity, and (G) private haplotypes and latitude.
Result of the analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) for 32 populations of S. foetidus using chloroplast DNA sequence data based upon geographical (glaciated vs. unglaciated) and SAMOVA groupings.
| Among groups | 1 | 28.377 | −0.04291 | −1.65 | 0.43402 ± 0.01510 | |
| Among populations within groups | 30 | 1035.591 | 2.27065 | 87.45 | 0.00000 ± 0.00000 | |
| Within populations | 453 | 167.050 | 0.36876 | 14.20 | 0.00000 ± 0.00000 | |
| Total | 484 | 1231.019 | 2.59650 | |||
| Among groups | 2 | 995.687 | 3.38441 | 87.12 | 0.00000 ± 0.00000 | |
| Among populations within groups | 29 | 68.282 | 0.13181 | 3.39 | 0.00000 ± 0.00000 | |
| Within populations | 453 | 167.050 | 0.36876 | 9.49 | 0.00000 ± 0.00000 | |
| Total | 484 | 1231.019 | 3.88498 | |||
F.
F.
F.
Figure 6Map of ecological niche modeling of Symplocarpus foetidus using six climatic variables under the Community Climate System Model (CCSM). (A) Predicted distribution probability (in logistic value) for current climatic conditions. (B) Average projection of the model to the last interglacial [LIG: ca. 130 ka before present (BP)]. (C) Average projection of the model to the last glacial maximum (LGM: ca. 21 ka BP).