| Literature DB >> 29872403 |
Savneet Kaur1, Rashi Sehgal1, Saggere M Shastry1, Geoffrey McCaughan2, Helen M McGuire2,3,4, Barbara Fazekas St de Groth4,5, Shiv Sarin1, Nirupma Trehanpati1, Devanshi Seth2,3,6,7.
Abstract
Background and Aim: Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) have been implicated in liver injury and repair. However, the phenotype and potential of these heterogenous EPCs remain elusive. In particular, their involvement in the pathogenesis of alcoholic liver cirrhosis (ALC) remains unclear. The current study extensively characterized the phenotype and functions of EPCs to understand their role in ALC pathogenesis.Entities:
Keywords: CD133; CD34; CD45; alcoholic liver cirrhosis; angiogenesis; endothelial progenitor cells; inflammation; mass cytometry CyTOF
Year: 2018 PMID: 29872403 PMCID: PMC5972283 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00556
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.566
Clinico-pathological features of patients.
| 25 | 27 | ||
| Age (years) | 38 (31–41) | 43 (20–61) | 0.06 |
| Male: Female | 28:3 | 53:2 | – |
| ALT/SGPT (IU/L) | 16 (12–19) | 36 (14–350) | 0.0000* |
| AST/SGOT (IU/L) | 9 (6–15) | 76.4 (16–1,460) | 0.0001* |
| SAP (IU/L) | 36 (33–40) | 99.50 (12–332) | 0.0000* |
| GGT (IU/L) | 11 (8–16) | 38 (11–449) | 0.0000* |
| Total Protein (g/dL) | 7 (6.2–7) | 7 (3–8.4) | 0.10 |
| Serum Albumin (g/dL) | 4 (3.6–4.1) | 2.5 (1.4–3.5) | 0.06 |
| Serum Globulin (g/dL) | 2 (2.1–2.8) | 4 (1.3–5.4) | 0.06 |
| PT (s) | 12 (12–12.4) | 19 (10–36.2) | 0.07 |
| INR | 1 (1–1.2) | 2 (0.93–4.77) | 0.056 |
| Bilirubin (mg/dL) | 1 (0.4–0.9) | 4 (1.5–35.1) | 0.058 |
| AFP (ng/ml) | 0 | 6.3 | 0.001* |
| Hb (g/dL) | – | 20 (10–27) | 0.20 |
| TLC (×109 per liter) | 15 (13–16) | 10 (7–12.5) | – |
| Lymphocytes (%) | – | 8 (2.8–22.3)% | 0.057 |
| Monocytes (%) | 30 (22–36) | 16 (5–68) | 0.08 |
| Neutrophils (%) | 6 (3–9) | 8 (2–23)% | 0.06 |
| Eosinophils (%) | 54 (45–70) | 72 (6–92) | 0.60 |
| Platelet Count (×109 /liter) | 3 (2–5) | 3 (1–18) | – |
AFP, Alfa fetoprotein; ALT, Alanine aminotransferase; AST, Aspartate aminotransferase; GGT, Gamma-glutamyl transferase; HB, hemoglobin; INR, International Normalized Ratio; IU/L, International unit/liter; PT, Prothrombin time; SAP, Serum alkaline phosphatise; TLC, Total leukocyte count.
Flow cytometry antibody panel.
| CD31 | WM59 | BD Biosciences | Alexa 647 |
| CD34 | 563 | BD Biosciences | PE |
| CD45 | 2D1 | BD Biosciences | Percp |
| CD133 | Ab16518 | Abcam | Unconjugated used with IgG anti-rabbit FITC |
| Vegfr2 | 89106 | BD Biosciences | PE |
Mass cytometry antibody panel information (alphabetical order).
| Anti-APC | APC003 | Fluidigm | Lu176 |
| Anti-FITC | FIT-22 | Fluidigm | Nd144 |
| Anti-PE | PE001 | Fluidigm | Nd145 |
| CCR5 | HEK/1/85a | Biolegend | FITC |
| CD117 | 104D2 | Biolegend | Nd143 |
| CD11b | ICRF44 | Biolegend | Bi209 |
| CD11c | Bu15 | Biolegend | In115 |
| CD127 | A019D5 | Biolegend | Ho165 |
| CD133 | Clone 7 | Biolegend | APC |
| CD14 | M5E2 | BD Biosciences | Gd160 |
| CD16 | 3G8 | BD Biosciences | Nd148 |
| CD183 (CXCR3) | G025H7 | Biolegend | Dy163 |
| CD184 (CXCR4) | 12G5 | BD Biosciences | Lu175 |
| CD19 | HIB19 | Biolegend | Nd142 |
| CD192 (CCR2) | K036C2 | Biolegend | Eu151 |
| CD197 (CCR7) | G043H7 | Biolegend | Tb159 |
| CD25 | M-A251 | Biolegend | Tm169 |
| CD27 | M-T271 | BD Biosciences | Pr141 |
| CD283 (TLR3) | TLR-104 | Biolegend | Sm147 |
| CD284 (TLR4) | HTA125 | Biolegend | Sm149 |
| CD3 | UCHT1 | BD Biosciences | Er170 |
| CD31 | WM59 | Biolegend | Gd155 |
| CD33 | WM53 | Fluidigm | Gd158 |
| CD335 (NKp46) | 9E2 | Biolegend | Yb173 |
| CD337 (NKp30) | P30 15 | BD Biosciences | Nd150 |
| CD34 | 581/CD34 | BD Biosciences | Er166 |
| CD38 | HIT2 | Biolegend | Er167 |
| CD4 | SK3 | Biolegend | Er168 |
| CD40 | HB14 | Miltenyi | Yb171 |
| CD45 | HI30 | Fluidigm | Gd154 |
| CD45RO | UCHL1 | Biolegend | Dy161 |
| CD57 | HCD57 | Biolegend | La139 |
| CD66b | 80H3 | Fluidigm | Sm152 |
| CD68 | KP1 | Bio-Rad | Eu153 |
| CD69 | FN50 | Fluidigm | Er162 |
| CD86 | IT2.2 | BD Biosciences | Gd156 |
| CD8A | RPA-T8 | Biolegend | Nd146 |
| CX3CR1 | 2A9-1 | Biolegend | Er164 |
| HLA-DR | L243 | Biolegend | Yb174 |
| IgM | MHM-88 | Biolegend | Yb172 |
| Vegrf2 | 89106 | BD Biosciences | PE |
| Cisplatin | Fluidigm | Pt194/195 | |
Figure 1Identification of circulating EPC sub-populations in human samples by flow cytometry. (A) Gating strategy for identification of EPCs using CD34, CD133, CD31, and CD45 antibody markers. The CD45 population was gated on the overall lymphocyte+monocyte cells in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). Double positive cells (CD133+CD31+) were identified on CD34 positive gate in the three CD45 populations. (B) Based on CD45 expression (negative: CD45−; intermediate: CD45int; high: CD45hi), representative plots show three distinct sub-populations of EPCs (CD34+ CD133+ CD31+) in patients with alcoholic cirrhosis (ALC, upper panel) and healthy controls (HC, lower panel). (C) Dot plots show percentage of EPC sub-populations increase in CD45int and CD45hi EPCs in patients with alcoholic cirrhosis (n = 7) compared to healthy controls (n = 7). The percentages were calculated using backgate analysis and single color controls. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01.
Figure 2Immunophenotype characterization of EPC sub-populations by CyTOF. (A) t-stochastic neighborhood embedding (t-SNE) plot shows all EPC events (red; CD31+CD34+) occupy their own specific niche distinct from other immune populations. (B) Distribution of EPC sub-populations based on their CD45 expression, show that majority of EPCs were CD45hi and CD45int with only ~5–6% of CD45− EPCs. Plot also shows other immune cell populations in human PBMCs. (C) Mean Fluorescence Intensity Heatmap of full cohort showing variable expressions of immune markers on EPC sub-populations. T cells, platelets, monocytes for each sample is shown for comparison. Marker characteristic of EPC populations (CD34, CD133, CD31, and Vegfr2) shown at top, with remaining markers ordered by average intensity of marker expression for CD34+ CD45hi population. Discrete expression patterns for the three EPC sub-populations show CD45− and CD45int EPCs sharing close resemblance that are markedly distinct from CD45hi EPCs.
Figure 3Morphological and functional characterization of ex vivo EPC in day 10 cultures. (A) Representative phase contrast images of EPC cultures at day 10 derived from PBMCs from healthy controls (HC) and patients (ALC). EPC clusters increased in ALC compared to HC (mag10X). (B) Dot plots of quantitation show significant increase in the number of EPC clusters in ALC patients compared to HC (n = 10 each). (C) Dot plots of cultured EPCs (CD34+vegfr2+) with CD45−/CD45int/CD45hi sub-populations show significant increase of EPCs in ALC compared to HC only for CD45hi EPCs. (D) Dot plots of cultured EPCs (CD34+CD31+) with CD45−/CD45int/CD45hi sub-populations show significant increase of EPCs in ALC compared to HC only for CD45hi EPCs. EPCs (CD34+vegfr2+; CD34+CD31+) were estimated as percentage of total cells (post-10 day cultures) by flow cytometry (n = 8 each). (E) Representative immunoflourescence images of cultured EPCs at day 10 show increased DiI-acLDL uptake (red) and UEA-lectin binding (green) and dual positives (yellow) in ALC patients compared to HC (mag 20X). (F) Significant increase in number of dual positive EPCs (ac-LDL and UEA-lectin) in patients with ALC compared to HC (n = 4 each). Dot plots show an average of about 5–6 fields from duplicate wells of ALC/HC samples counted for dual positive EPCs using object count feature of NIS-Elements (Software Version: 3.0). *P < 0.05; ***P < 0.001.
Figure 4Secreted cytokine profiles of cultured EPCs from ALC patients and HC at day 10. Dot plots of normalized levels of cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors (pg/ml) show significant up-regulation in the secretion of FGF-2 and VEGF, and down-regulation of IL-10 in patients with ALC (n = 10) compared to healthy controls (n = 10). *P < 0.05; **P < 0.02. NS, Non-significant.