| Literature DB >> 29872237 |
Ines Musa Trolić1, Gianluca Turco2, Luca Contardo2, Nikolina Leona Serdarević3, Helena Otmačić1,2,3,4, Stjepan Špalj4.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to examine how probiotic supplements affect the corrosion stability of orthodontic archwires made of nickel-titanium alloy (NiTi).Entities:
Keywords: Alloys; Corrosion, Probiotics; Orthodontic Wires; Surface Properties
Year: 2017 PMID: 29872237 PMCID: PMC5975453 DOI: 10.15644/asc51/4/6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Stomatol Croat ISSN: 0001-7019
Figure 1Comparison of surface roughness between NiTi archwire types and experimental conditions. Horizontal lines connect the media that produce significant differences for the same wire type.
Figure 2SEM magnification 1000x of unexposed material
Figure 3SEM magnification 1000x material after being exposed for 28 days to artificial saliva (first row), and material after being exposed to artificial saliva and probiotic supplement (second row)
Figure 4Graphic presentation of curves of cyclic polarisation measurements of NiTi archwires in saliva and in saliva containing probiotic supplement
Values of corrosion parameters
| archwire | corrosion parameter | media | - mean± SD | 95% CI* | p** | η2*** |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NiTi | corrosion current density (Icor/ nAcm-2) | saliva | 31.3±16.3 | -9.1-71.7 | ||
| probiotic | 19.9±8.7 | -1.6-41.4 | 0.343 | 0.224 | ||
| korocorrosion potential (Ecor / mV) | saliva | 76.3±20.4 | 25.6-127.0 | |||
| probiotic | -149.3±37.7 | -243.0-(-55.7) | 0.001 | 0.954 | ||
| repasivation potential (Erp / mV) | saliva | 1205.0±11.5 | 1176.2-1233.8 | |||
| probiotic | - | - | - | - | ||
| brakedown potential (Ebd / mV) | saliva | 1272.7±23.7 | 1213.9-1331.5 | |||
| probiotic | 469.7±124.6 | 160.0-779.3 | <0.001 | 0.968 | ||
| NNiTi | corrosion current density (Icor/ nAcm-2) | saliva | 24.3±20.5 | -26.7-75.3 | ||
| probiotic | 28.0±20.0 | -21.8-77.8 | 0.834 | 0.013 | ||
| corrosion potential (Ecor / mV) | saliva | -31.7±65.0 | -193.1-129.8 | |||
| probiotic | -247.4±59.3 | -394.7-(-100.0) | 0.013 | 0.818 | ||
| repasivation potential (Erp / mV) | saliva | 1193.0±29.8 | 1118.9-1267.1 | |||
| probiotic | 729.9±14.9 | 692.9-767.0 | <0.001 | 0.993 | ||
| brakedown potential (Ebd / mV) | saliva | 1328.7±82.1 | 1124.7-1532.6 | |||
| probiotic | 1317.6±76.4 | 1127.8-1507.4 | 0.873 | 0.007 | ||
| RhNiTi | corrosion current density (Icor/ nAcm-2) | saliva | 100.7±40.1 | 1.2-200.2 | ||
| probiotic | 120.4±12.7 | 88.8-152.1 | 0.461 | 0.142 | ||
| corrosion potential (Ecor / mV) | saliva | 162.0±34.0 | 77.6-246.4 | |||
| probiotic | 137.0±3.7 | 127.9-146.1 | 0.273 | 0.287 | ||
| repasivation potential (Erp / mV) | saliva | - | - | |||
| probiotic | - | - | - | - | ||
| brakedown potential (Ebd / mV) | saliva | 764.7±60.4 | 614.5-914.8 | |||
| probiotic | 1033.0±283.1 | 329.7-1736.3 | 0.184 | 0.392 |
* CI: confidence interval; p: level of significance; η2: effect size.
Figure 5SEM magnification 1000x of unexposed wire (first row) and wire after electrochemical testing in saliva containing probiotic supplement (second row)