Literature DB >> 29871983

Bluegill sunfish use high power outputs from axial muscles to generate powerful suction-feeding strikes.

Ariel L Camp1, Thomas J Roberts2, Elizabeth L Brainerd2.   

Abstract

Suction-feeding fish rapidly expand the mouth cavity to generate high-velocity fluid flows that accelerate food into the mouth. Such fast and forceful suction expansion poses a challenge, as muscle power is limited by muscle mass and the muscles in fish heads are relatively small. The largemouth bass powers expansion with its large body muscles, with negligible power produced by the head muscles (including the sternohyoideus). However, bluegill sunfish - with powerful strikes but different morphology and feeding behavior - may use a different balance of cranial and axial musculature to power feeding and different power outputs from these muscles. We estimated the power required for suction expansion in sunfish from measurements of intraoral pressure and rate of volume change, and measured muscle length and velocity. Unlike largemouth bass, the sternohyoideus did shorten to generate power, but it and other head muscles were too small to contribute more than 5-10% of peak expansion power in sunfish. We found no evidence of catapult-style power amplification. Instead, sunfish powered suction feeding by generating high power outputs (up to 438 W kg-1) from their axial muscles. These muscles shortened across the cranial half of the body as in bass, but at faster speeds that may be nearer the optimum for power production. Sunfish were able to generate strikes of the same absolute power as bass, but with 30-40% of the axial muscle mass. Thus, species may use the body and head muscles differently to meet the requirements of suction feeding, depending on their morphology and behavior.
© 2018. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fluoromicrometry; Muscle power; Muscle work; Shortening velocity; XROMM

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29871983     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.178160

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  6 in total

1.  Dual function of epaxial musculature for swimming and suction feeding in largemouth bass.

Authors:  Yordano E Jimenez; Elizabeth L Brainerd
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Hydrodynamic performance of suction feeding is virtually unaffected by variation in the shape of the posterior region of the pharynx in fish.

Authors:  Pauline Provini; Sam Van Wassenbergh
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 2.963

3.  Bifunctional Role of the Sternohyoideus Muscle During Suction Feeding in Striped Surfperch, Embiotoca lateralis.

Authors:  J J Lomax; T F Martinson; Y E Jimenez; E L Brainerd
Journal:  Integr Org Biol       Date:  2020-07-29

4.  Fishes can use axial muscles as anchors or motors for powerful suction feeding.

Authors:  Ariel L Camp; Aaron M Olsen; L Patricia Hernandez; Elizabeth L Brainerd
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  A new conceptual framework for the musculoskeletal biomechanics and physiology of ray-finned fishes.

Authors:  Ariel L Camp; Elizabeth L Brainerd
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Elastic energy storage in seahorses leads to a unique suction flow dynamics compared with other actinopterygians.

Authors:  Corrine Avidan; Roi Holzman
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2021-09-03       Impact factor: 3.312

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.