Literature DB >> 29871786

Measurement techniques to determine tibial rotation after total knee arthroplasty are less accurate than we think.

A H van Houten1, N M Kosse2, M Wessels3, A B Wymenga4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The present study assessed the inter- and intra-observer reliability of tibial and femoral rotation measures after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and evaluated the correlation between these measurement techniques and their clinical relevance.
METHODS: Femoral rotation and tibial rotation were determined on 42 2D CT-scans made three-months after TKA. Reliability of the radiological measurements (including Berger's method, the anatomical tibial axis and the tibial tuberosity trochlear-groove) was assessed with 15 randomly selected patients measured twice by three observers. Functional outcomes were scored one-year postoperatively with the KSS, VAS pain, VAS satisfaction, KOOS, and Kujala.
RESULTS: The inter- and intra-observer reliability of the rotational measurements ranged from good to excellent (ICC 0.67-0.98). Tibial rotation measured with the Berger technique was most reliable (ICC inter = 0.91; ICC intra = 0.96). No strong correlations were found between the different rotational measures or the clinical outcomes and rotational outliers.
CONCLUSIONS: Tibial rotation is most reliable measured with the technique described by Berger. There were no strong correlations found between the different tibial rotation measures or between the clinical outcomes and the rotational outliers. Further research is needed to gain more insight into optimal positioning and measuring rotation in TKA for clinical practice.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  2D CT-scan; Computed tomography; Rotational alignment; Tibial rotation; Total knee arthroplasty (TKA); Total knee replacement

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29871786     DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2018.05.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee        ISSN: 0968-0160            Impact factor:   2.199


  5 in total

Review 1.  Methods of intra- and post-operative determination of the position of the tibial component during total knee replacement.

Authors:  Roman Popescu; Emil G Haritinian; Stefan Cristea
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-10-27       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  The personalized Berger method is usable to solve the problem of tibial rotation.

Authors:  Gömöri András; Gábor Németh; Csaba Zsolt Oláh; Gábor Lénárt; Zsanett Drén; Miklós Papp
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2021-12-11

3.  CT measures of femoral and tibial version and rotational position of femoral and tibial components of knee replacements: limitations in reliability and suitability for routine clinical practice.

Authors:  Andoni P Toms; Tamam Rifai; Celia Whitehouse; Iain McNamara
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 7.034

4.  Accurate determination of post-operative 3D component positioning in total knee arthroplasty: the AURORA protocol.

Authors:  Edgar A Wakelin; Linda Tran; Joshua G Twiggs; Willy Theodore; Justin P Roe; Michael I Solomon; Brett A Fritsch; Brad P Miles
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 2.359

5.  CAPAbility: comparison of the JOURNEY II Bi-Cruciate Stabilised and GENESIS II total knee arthroplasty in performance and functional ability: protocol of a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Celia Clarke; Valerie Pomeroy; Allan Clark; Graham Creelman; Nicola Hancock; Simon Horton; Anne Killett; Charles Mann; Estelle Payerne; Andoni Toms; Gareth Roberts; Toby Smith; Ann Marie Swart; Iain McNamara
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 2.279

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.