Literature DB >> 29871745

Predicting caregiver burden in general veterinary clients: Contribution of companion animal clinical signs and problem behaviors.

M B Spitznagel1, D M Jacobson2, M D Cox3, M D Carlson3.   

Abstract

Caregiver burden, found in many clients with a chronically or terminally ill companion animal, has been linked to poorer psychosocial function in the client and greater utilization of non-billable veterinary services. To reduce client caregiver burden, its determinants must first be identified. This study examined if companion animal clinical signs and problem behaviors predict veterinary client burden within broader client- and patient-based risk factor models. Data were collected in two phases. Phase 1 included 238 companion animal owners, including those with a sick companion animal (n=119) and matched healthy controls (n=119) recruited online. Phase 2 was comprised of 602 small animal general veterinary hospital clients (n=95 with a sick dog or cat). Participants completed cross-sectional online assessments of caregiver burden, psychosocial resources (social support, active coping, self-mastery), and an item pool of companion animal clinical signs and problem behaviors. Several signs/behaviors correlated with burden, most prominently: weakness, appearing sad/depressed or anxious, appearing to have pain/discomfort, change in personality, frequent urination, and excessive sleeping/lethargy. Within patient-based risk factors, caregiver burden was predicted by frequency of the companion animal's signs/behaviors (P<.01). Within client-based factors, potentially modifiable factors of client reaction to the animal's signs/behaviors (P=.01), and client sense of control (P<.04) predicted burden. Understanding burden may enhance veterinarian-client communication, and is important due to potential downstream effects of client burden, such as higher workload for the veterinarian. Supporting the client's sense of control may help alleviate burden when amelioration of the companion animal's presentation is not feasible.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Burden; Caregiver; Client; Pet Problem Severity Scale; Psychosocial

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29871745     DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2018.04.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet J        ISSN: 1090-0233            Impact factor:   2.688


  8 in total

1.  Canine Caregivers: Paradoxical Challenges and Rewards.

Authors:  Lori R Kogan; Jean E Wallace; Peter W Hellyer; Eloise C J Carr
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 3.231

2.  The Responsibility of Veterinarians to Address Companion Animal Obesity.

Authors:  Barry S Kipperman; Alexander J German
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 2.752

3.  Validation of an abbreviated instrument to assess veterinary client caregiver burden.

Authors:  Mary Beth Spitznagel; Megan K Mueller; Taylor Fraychak; Andrew M Hoffman; Mark D Carlson
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 3.333

4.  "We have a ticking time bomb": a qualitative exploration of the impact of canine epilepsy on dog owners living in England.

Authors:  Amy E Pergande; Zoe Belshaw; Holger A Volk; Rowena M A Packer
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 2.741

5.  "What Would You Do?": How Cat Owners Make End-of-Life Decisions and Implications for Veterinary-Client Interactions.

Authors:  Katherine Littlewood; Ngaio Beausoleil; Kevin Stafford; Christine Stephens
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Treatment complexity and caregiver burden are linked in owners of dogs with allergic/atopic dermatitis.

Authors:  Mary Beth Spitznagel; Andrew Hillier; Margaret Gober; Mark D Carlson
Journal:  Vet Dermatol       Date:  2021-02-07       Impact factor: 1.589

7.  Depression, anxiety, and happiness in dog owners and potential dog owners during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States.

Authors:  Francois Martin; Katherine E Bachert; LeAnn Snow; Hsiao-Wei Tu; Julien Belahbib; Sandra A Lyn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Human-Animal Interaction and Perinatal Mental Health: A Narrative Review of Selected Literature and Call for Research.

Authors:  Shelby E McDonald; Camie A Tomlinson; Jennifer W Applebaum; Sara W Moyer; Samantha M Brown; Sue Carter; Patricia A Kinser
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-09-26       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.