| Literature DB >> 29871674 |
Yuwen Wang1,2,3, Jingjing Cheng1,2,3, Dan Xie4,5, Xiaofeng Ding1,2,3, Hailing Hou1,2,3, Xi Chen1,2,3, Puchun Er1,2,3, Furong Zhang1,2,3, Lujun Zhao1,2,3, Zhiyong Yuan1,2,3, Qingsong Pang1,2,3, Ping Wang6,7,8, Dong Qian9,10,11.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cisplatin-based chemotherapy with concurrent radiotherapy is a standard treatment for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). NS1-binding protein (NS1-BP), a member of the BTB-kelch protein family, has been shown to inhibit the proliferation of Hela cells by suppressing c-Myc. In the present study, we examined the potential function role of NS1-BP expression in ESCC, and particularly, the sensitivity of ESCC to radiotherapy.Entities:
Keywords: Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; NS1-BP; Prognostic biomarker; Radiotherapy; c-Myc
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29871674 PMCID: PMC5993120 DOI: 10.1186/s40880-018-0307-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Commun (Lond) ISSN: 2523-3548
Fig. 1NS1-BP expression in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and its prognostic significance in ESCC patients. a Western blot showing lower NS1-BP levels in ESCC tissues than adjacent non-neoplastic esophageal mucosa tissues (ANT) in 8 of 10 cases. b Normal esophageal mucosa specimen showing strong staining of NS1-BP (IHC score = 12). c ESCC sample (case 15) exhibiting negative NS1-BP staining. d ESCC sample (case 8) exhibiting low NS1-BP expression (IHC score = 3). e ESCC sample (case 60) exhibiting high NS1-BP expression (IHC score = 9). f Statistical analysis of significantly low expression of NS1-BP in ESCC tissues (**P < 0.01). g, h Low expression of NS1-BP was associated with poor prognosis of ESCC patients. Kaplan–Meier plots showing disease-specific survival in 98 ESCC patients in the training cohort (g) and 46 ESCC patients in the validation cohort (h), according to NS1-BP expression levels in the primary tumor (P = 0.009 and 0.016, log-rank test)
Association between clinicopathologic factors and NS1-BP expression in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients
| Variables | Learning cohort [cases (%)] | Validation cohort [cases (%)] | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| High expression | Low expression | High expression | Low expression | |||
| Age (years) | 0.775 | 0.547 | ||||
| ≤ 55a | 22 (40.7) | 32 (59.3) | 10 (40.0) | 15 (60.0) | ||
| > 55 | 19 (43.1) | 25 (56.9) | 8 (38.0) | 13 (62.0) | ||
| Gender | 0.501 | 0.709 | ||||
| Male | 34 (41.5) | 48 (58.5) | 15 (36.8) | 23 (63.2) | ||
| Female | 7 (43.8) | 9 (56.2) | 3 (37.5) | 5 (62.5) | ||
| WHO grade | 0.719 | 0.660 | ||||
| G1 | 11 (45.8) | 13 (54.2) | 4 (36.4) | 7 (63.6) | ||
| G2 | 20 (40.0) | 30 (60.0) | 8 (40.0) | 12 (60.0) | ||
| G3/4 | 10 (41.7) | 14 (58.3) | 6 (40.0) | 9 (60.0) | ||
| Tumor size (cm) | 0.640 | 0.387 | ||||
| ≤ 6b | 22 (39.3) | 34 (60.7) | 13 (40.7) | 19 (59.3) | ||
| > 6 | 19 (45.2) | 23 (54.8) | 5 (35.8) | 9 (64.2) | ||
| T category | 0.541 | 0.174 | ||||
| T2 | 5 (41.7) | 7 (58.3) | 6 (50.0) | 6 (50.0) | ||
| T3 | 14 (40.0) | 21 (60.0) | 6 (33.3) | 12 (66.7) | ||
| T4 | 22 (43.1) | 29 (56.9) | 6 (37.5) | 10 (62.5) | ||
| N category | 0.622 | 0.328 | ||||
| N0 | 8 (47.1) | 9 (52.9) | 6 (42.9) | 8 (57.1) | ||
| N1 | 33 (40.8) | 48 (59.2) | 12 (37.5) | 20 (62.5) | ||
| M category | 0.352 | 0.302 | ||||
| M0 | 27 (45.8) | 32 (54.2) | 10 (41.7) | 14 (58.3) | ||
| M1-lym | 14 (35.9) | 25 (64.1) | 8 (31.9) | 14 (68.1) | ||
| CRT response | 0.007 | 0.003 | ||||
| CR | 14 (73.7) | 5 (26.3) | 8 (80.0) | 2 (20.0) | ||
| Not CR | 27 (34.2) | 52 (65.8) | 10 (27.8) | 26 (72.2) | ||
ESCC esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, T tumor, N node, M metastases, M1-lym distant lymph node metastasis, CR complete response
* χ2 test
aMean age
bMean tumor size
Univariate Cox regression analysis of potential prognostic factors for ESCC patients
| Variables | Learning cohort | Validation cohort | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95% CI) | HR (95% CI) | |||
| Age (years) | ||||
| ≤ 55a | 1.000 | 1.000 | ||
| > 55 | 1.075 (0.743–1.398) | 0.826 | 1.115 (0.673–1.375) | 0.747 |
| Gender | ||||
| Male | 1.000 | 1.000 | ||
| Female | 0.673 (0.512–0.887) | 0.036 | 0.596 (0.425–0.862) | 0.041 |
| WHO grade | ||||
| G1 | 1.000 | 1.000 | ||
| G2 | 1.376 (0.373–3.746) | 0.019 | 1.542 (0.538–4.137) | 0.033 |
| G3/4 | 2.479 (0.469–4.837) | < 0.001 | 2.058 (0.558–6.726) | < 0.001 |
| T category | ||||
| T2–3 | 1.000 | 1.000 | ||
| T4 | 5.475 (2.886–14.137) | 0.014 | 6.889 (2.135–19.559) | 0.008 |
| N category | ||||
| N0 | 1.000 | 1.000 | ||
| N1 | 9.963 (4.472–18.336) | < 0.001 | 12.559 (6.838–16.945) | < 0.001 |
| M category | ||||
| M0 | 1.000 | 1.000 | ||
| M1-lymb | 21.958 (11.028–67.559) | < 0.001 | 16.996 (7.459–70.137) | < 0.001 |
| CRT response | ||||
| CR | 1.000 | 1.000 | ||
| Not CR | 18.965 (13.447–78.775) | 0.007 | 22.598 (9.589–56.779 | < 0.001 |
| NS1-BP expression | ||||
| High | 1.000 | 1.000 | ||
| Low | 16.795 (9.984–52.694) | 0.002 | 21.821 (14.470–68.632) | < 0.001 |
ESCC esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, T tumor, N node, M metastases, CR complete response
*χ2 test
aMean age
bDistant lymph node metastases
Multivariate Cox regression analysis of disease-specific survival
| Variables | Learning cohort | Validation cohort | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR | 95% CI |
| HR | 95% CI |
| |
| NS1-BP expression | 2.229 | 0.929–3.996 | 0.019 | 2.518 | 1.085–5.226 | 0.010 |
| CRT response | 3.271 | 1.485–7.207 | 0.003 | 3.958 | 1.386–7.667 | 0.008 |
| N category | 1.233 | 0.586–2.595 | 0.581 | 1.663 | 0.562–3.893 | 0.329 |
| M category | 1.595 | 0.946–2.691 | 0.080 | 1.331 | 0.667–2.433 | 0.039 |
ESCC esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, DSS disease-specific survival, HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval
Fig. 2Effect of NS1-BP overexpression on ESCC cell proliferation and apoptosis. a Western blot showing that the levels of NS1-BP in five ESCC cell lines (KYSE-30, KYSE-510, TE-1, KYSE-140, and KYSE-410) were lower than in control normal esophageal cells (N). b Western blot showing the expression of NS1-BP in stable transfected TE-1 and KYSE-30 cells (TE-1-NS1-BP; KYSE-30-NS1-BP) relative to empty vector control cells (TE-1-Vector; KYSE-30-Vector) and blank control cells (TE-1-Blank; KYSE-30-Blank). Expression was normalized against endogenous GAPDH. c Cell growth rate was decreased by ectopic overexpression of NS-BP in TE-1 and KYSE-30 cells, as detected by the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide assay. Results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) of three independent experiments. d NS1-BP promoted tumor cell apoptosis in TE-1 and KYSE-30 cells compared with vector-transfected control cells and blank control cells under normal conditions. Cell apoptotic death events were monitored by annexin V/propidium iodide (PI) staining and flow cytometry assays. The percentage of apoptotic cells is shown as the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. Data represent mean values and SD (*P < 0.05, Student’s t test)
Fig. 3NS1-BP radiosensitizes ESCC cells in vitro. a Colony formation assay showing that the survival capacity of ESCC cells ectopically overexpressing NS1-BP was lower than that of control cells after IR (**P < 0.01). b Enhanced expression of NS1-BP promoted IR-induced apoptosis in both KYSE-30 and TE-1 cells. Annexin V and propidium iodide staining was used to determine the percentage of apoptotic cells. Data represent mean values and SD (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01, Student’s t test). c Ectopic overexpression of NS1-BP the amount of increased unrepaired DNA damages-DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) induced by IR. Cells were subjected to 4 Gy IR and fixed for immunofluorescence 24 h later. Staining for antibodies against γ-H2AX (green) as a measure of DSBs is shown. Quantification of the average number of IR-induced γH2AX foci per cell is also shown (lower panel). Data represent mean values and SD d Ectopic overexpression of NS1-BP significantly decreased IR-induced G2/M cell cycle arrest after 4 Gy X-ray irradiation in both ESCC cell lines. Panel shows percentage of cells in G2/M. e Western blot showing that NS1-BP overexpression of increased cleaved caspase 3 and PARP in both TE-1 and KYSE-30 cells exposed to 4-Gy irradiation (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01, according to Student’s t test)
Fig. 4Silencing NS1-BP induces radioresistance of ESCC cells in vitro. a, b Depletion of NS1-BP decreased c-Myc expression and promoted proliferation of TE-1 cells. c–e Loss-of-function studies revealed that NS1-BP depletion induced cellular radioresistance (c), and attenuated apoptosis (d) and unrepaired DNA damage (e) induced by irradiation (*P < 0.05, according to student’s t test)
Fig. 5Enhanced expression of NS1-BP suppresses MYC signaling by transcriptionally inhibiting c-Myc. a Western blot showing the expression of key downstream factors of the MYC signaling pathway. All data were derived from three independent experiments. b c-Myc phenotype reversal in NS1-BP-overexpressing cells restored the expression of survivin, CDK4, and p27. c Western blot showing that ectopic NS1-BP expression attenuated irradiation-induced activation of the ATM/Chk1 pathway (ATM phosphorylated ATM, Chk1 phosphorylated Chk1, Chk2 phosphorylated Chk2). d Analysis of luciferase activity. Fragment containing c-Myc promoter region sequence was cloned downstream of the luciferase reporter gene. Plasmids were transfected into empty vectors or NS1-BP stably expressing cells. Renilla luciferase plasmids were co-transfected for normalization. Data are the mean ± SD of three independent experiments (**P < 0.01). e ChIP assay on ESCC cellular extracts using NS1-BP antibodies followed by RT-PCR to analyze the associated c-Myc promoter region. (NC non-related c-Myc promoter negative control)
Fig. 6NS1-BP potentiates the therapeutic effect of irradiation on ESCC xenografts. a Volumes of tumor xenografts were measured every 3 days with calipers for 36–45 days. NS1-BP inhibited the growth of tumors in the non-treatment groups (control and NS1-BP). The mean tumor volume in the control and NS1-BP groups was 1264.6 ± 240 and 1033 ± 113 mm3, respectively (n = 6, P = 0.036, Student’s t test). After 6-Gy irradiation (control + IR and NS1-BP + IR groups), the mean tumor volume in the NS1-BP group was significantly smaller (326.6 ± 66 mm3 versus 742.3 ± 136 mm3 in the control; n = 6, P = 0.007, Student’s t test). Values represent mean tumor volume ± SD (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01, student’s t test). b Representative images show tumor xenografts in null mice with TE-1-Control and TE-1-NS1-BP cells. Immunohistochemical staining of NS1-BP and c-Myc of tumor sections excised from mice. Lower c-Myc expression was seen in NS1-BP-overexpressing cells than in TE-1 vector control cells
Fig. 7c-Myc negatively correlates with NS1-BP expression in ESCC. a Immunohistochemical staining of c-Myc in ESCC samples. Representative images showing higher expression of c-Myc in samples with low NS1-BP levels, and lower expression of c-Myc in samples with high NS1-BP levels. b c-Myc expression was inversely correlated with NS1-BP levels in 144 ESCC samples. The correlation was determined with linear regression lines and Pearson’s correlation significance (Pearson R = − 0.7989, **P < 0.01). c, d Upregulation of c-Myc was significantly associated with poor prognosis of ESCC patients. Kaplan–Meier plots show disease-specific survival in 98 ESCC patients in the training cohort (c) and 46 ESCC patients in the validation cohort (d) according to c-Myc expression levels in the primary tumor (P = 0.008 and 0.011, log-rank Table 1 Association between clinicopathologic factors and NS1-BP expression in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients