| Literature DB >> 29870945 |
Chuan-Jie Zhang1, Min-Jung Yook1, Hae-Rim Park1, Soo-Hyun Lim1, Jin-Won Kim1, Gyoungju Nah1, Hae-Ryong Song2, Beom-Ho Jo2, Kyung Hee Roh3, Suhyoung Park4, Do-Soon Kim5.
Abstract
The cultivation of genetically modified (GM) crops has raised many questions regarding their environmental risks, particularly about their ecological impact on non-target organisms, such as their closely-related relative species. Although evaluations of transgene flow from GM crops to their conventional crops has been conducted under large-scale farming system worldwide, in particular in North America and Australia, few studies have been conducted under smallholder farming systems in Asia with diverse crops in co-existence. A two-year field study was conducted to assess the potential environmental risks of gene flow from glufosinate-ammonium resistant (GR) Brassica napus to its conventional relatives, B. napus, B. juncea, and Raphanus sativus under simulated smallholder field conditions in Korea. Herbicide resistance and simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers were used to identify the hybrids. Hybridization frequency of B. napus × GR B. napus was 2.33% at a 2 m distance, which decreased to 0.007% at 75 m. For B. juncea, it was 0.076% at 2 m and decreased to 0.025% at 16 m. No gene flow was observed to R. sativus. The log-logistic model described hybridization frequency with increasing distance from GR B. napus to B. napus and B. juncea and predicted that the effective isolation distances for 0.01% gene flow from GR B. napus to B. napus and B. juncea were 122.5 and 23.7 m, respectively. Results suggest that long-distance gene flow from GR B. napus to B. napus and B. juncea is unlikely, but gene flow can potentially occur between adjacent fields where the smallholder farming systems exist.Entities:
Keywords: Herbicide resistance management; Hybridization frequency; Log-logistic model; Potential transgene flow; Risk assessment and management
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29870945 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.335
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Total Environ ISSN: 0048-9697 Impact factor: 7.963