Literature DB >> 29870735

Is there evidence of a July effect among patients undergoing hysterectomy surgery?

Sanskriti Varma1, Ambar Mehta1, Susan Hutfless2, Rebecca L Stone3, Stephanie L Wethington3, Amanda N Fader4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is hypothesized that the quality of health care decreases during trainee turnovers at the beginning of the academic year. The influx of new gynecology and surgery residents into hospitals in this setting may be associated with poorer surgical outcomes, known as the July effect.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to systematically study hysterectomy outcomes in the state of Maryland during the 3-month period July through September as compared to all other months of the academic year, in order to assess for the presence of a July effect in hysterectomy surgery. STUDY
DESIGN: This is a retrospective study of the Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission Database from July 2012 through September 2015 focused on women undergoing hysterectomies for benign or malignant disease, either by obstetricians and gynecologists or gynecologic oncologists, during July through September vs October through June. Multivariable logistic regressions accounted for clustering by hospitals and adjusted for several cofactors. The primary outcome includes at least 1 of 11 major perioperative in-hospital complications; the secondary outcomes were extended postoperative length of stay (defined as >2 days) and 30-day inpatient readmission rates.
RESULTS: We identified 6311 hysterectomies (78.2% benign) performed by 424 surgeons at 20 academic hospitals. Patients were primarily white (42.8%), 45-64 years old (54.4%), and had private insurance (66.3%). The unadjusted rate of in-hospital complications was 16.8%, extended length of stay was 30.3%, and 30-day readmissions was 6.6%. After adjustment, patients undergoing hysterectomies during July through September did not have more adverse outcomes relative to those undergoing surgery at other times of the year: complications (adjusted odds ratio, 0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.75-1.01), length of stay >2 days (adjusted odds ratio, 1.03; 95% confidence interval, 0.90-1.19), and 30-day readmissions (adjusted odds ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.80-1.23). Sensitivity analyses assessing individual complications, hysterectomy outcomes at nonacademic hospitals, and benign vs malignant indications for hysterectomies yielded similar findings.
CONCLUSION: Women in Maryland undergoing hysterectomy surgery at academic hospitals during July through September of the academic year did not experience worse outcomes relative to women having surgery in other months. Additional studies are necessary to further assess the possibility of a July effect in hysterectomy on a national basis. Institutions should continue to provide effective surgical training environments for new interns and residents transitioning to more senior roles, while maintaining optimal patient safety.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  July effect; academic hospitals; gynecology surgery; hysterectomy; perioperative outcomes; residency training

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29870735     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.05.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  1 in total

1.  July Effect in Obstetric Outcomes.

Authors:  Megan Pagan; Ann Marie Mercier; Dayna Whitcombe; Songthip T Ounpraseuth; Everett F Magann; Amy Phillips
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2022-02-09
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.