| Literature DB >> 29870121 |
Laura Golsteijn1, Lindsay Lessard2, Jean-Florent Campion3, Alexandre Capelli4, Virginie D'Enfert5, Henry King6, Joachim Kremer7, Michael Krugman8, Hélène Orliac9, Severine Roullet Furnemont10, Werner Schuh7, Mark Stalmans11, Natasha Williams O'Hanlon12, Manuela Coroama13.
Abstract
In 2013, the European Commission launched the Environmental Footprint Rules pilot phase. This initiative aims at setting specific rules for life cycle assessment (LCA: raw material sourcing, production, logistics, use, and disposal phase) studies within 1 product category, called product environmental footprint category rules (PEFCR), and for organizations, called organizational environmental footprint sector rules (OEFSR). Such specific rules for measuring environmental performance throughout the life cycle should facilitate the comparability between LCA studies and provide principles for communicating environmental performance, such as transparency, reliability, completeness, and clarity. Cosmetics Europe, the association representing the cosmetics industry in the European Union, completed a voluntary study into the development of PEFCR for shampoo, generally following the guidelines and methodology developed by the European Commission for its own pilot projects. The study assessed the feasibility and relevance of establishing PEFCR for shampoo. Specifically, the study defines a large number of modeling assumptions and default values relevant for shampoo (e.g., for the functional unit, the system boundaries, default transport distances, rinsing water volumes, temperature differences, life cycle inventory data sources) that can be modified as appropriate, according to the specificities of individual products, manufacturing companies, and countries. The results of the study may be used to support internal decision making (e.g., to identify "hotspots" with high environmental impact and opportunities for improvement) or to meet information requests from commercial partners, consumers, media, or authorities on product environmental characteristics. In addition, the shampoo study also highlighted many of the challenges and limitations of the current product environmental footprint (PEF) methodology, namely its complexity and resource intensiveness. It highlighted 2 areas where improvements are much needed: (1) data quality and availability, and (2) impact assessment methodologies and robustness. Many of the findings are applicable to other rinse-off cosmetic products, such as shower gels, liquid soaps, bath products, and hair conditioners. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2018;14:649-659.Entities:
Keywords: Cosmetics; Environmental footprint; Impact assessment; Life cycle assessment; Standardization
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29870121 DOI: 10.1002/ieam.4064
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Integr Environ Assess Manag ISSN: 1551-3777 Impact factor: 2.992