| Literature DB >> 29870035 |
Myung-Shin Kim1, Seungill Kim2, Jongbum Jeon1, Ki-Tae Kim3, Hyun-Ah Lee4, Hye-Young Lee2, Jieun Park1, Eunyoung Seo2, Saet-Byul Kim2, Seon-In Yeom5, Yong-Hwan Lee1,3, Doil Choi1,2.
Abstract
Hot pepper (Capsicum annuum) is one of the most consumed vegetable crops in the world and useful to human as it has many nutritional and medicinal values. Genomic resources of pepper are publically available since the pepper genomes have been completed and massive data such as transcriptomes have been deposited. Nevertheless, global transcriptome profiling is needed to identify molecular mechanisms related to agronomic traits in pepper, but limited analyses are published. Here, we report the comprehensive analysis of pepper transcriptomes during fruit ripening and pathogen infection. For the ripening, transcriptome data were obtained from placenta and pericarp at seven developmental stages. To reveal global transcriptomic landscapes during infection, leaves at six time points post-infection by one of three pathogens (Phytophthora infestans, Pepper mottle virus, and Tobacco mosaic virus P0 strain) were profiled. The massive parallel transcriptome profiling in this study will serve as a valuable resource for detection of molecular networks of fruit development and disease resistance in Capsicum annuum.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29870035 PMCID: PMC5987667 DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2018.103
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Data ISSN: 2052-4463 Impact factor: 6.444
Figure 1Schematic overview of the analysis pipeline.
The pepper transcriptome of fruit organs and pathogen- infected leaves including three biological replicates except for Mock-Up (n=2) were collected from NCBI SRA (SRP106410 and SRP119199). All raw sequences were pre-processed and assessed using FastQC (http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc) and MultiQC. The filtered reads were mapped to Capsicum annuum reference genome (v.1.55) using CLC assembly. The mapped reads were normalized RPKM and log2 transformed mean value were used to PCA.
Statistics of pepper transcriptomes used in this study.
| Sample | Tissue/treatment | Read type | Sampling method | Time point | Preprocessed data (Gb) | Accession number |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PepMov: pepper mottle virus; TMV_P0: tobacco mottle virus P0 strain; TDW: control for | ||||||
| Fruit organ | PlacentaPericarp | Single | Tissue sampling | 6, 16, 25, 36, 38, 43, 48 DAP | 4.325.12 | SRP119199 |
| Oomycete | Paired | Suspensiondroplet | 0, 6, 12, 2448, 90, 120 h | 13.210.92 | SRP106410 SRP119199 | |
| Virus | PepMovTMV_P0Mock | Paired | Rubbing with carborundum on the leaves | 0, 0.5, 4, 24, 48, 72 h and systemic leaves | 9.666.1515.16 | SRP119199 |
Figure 2Quality assessment of pepper transcriptomes.
The filtered reads from all 136 samples were assessed by MultiQC. (a) Mean quality scores distribution in each position. (b) Read counts distribution for mean sequence quality. (c) GC ratio distribution. (d) Read length distribution.
Figure 3Global gene expression pattern in pepper transcriptomes.
The log2 transformed mean RPKM values were plotted by boxplot function in R (a). The line plot (b) and scatter plots of PC1 versus PC2 (c) and PC1 versus PC3 (d) were drawn using previously published code with modification[32]. The abbreviations see method section 2.