Literature DB >> 29869762

Error-checking intraoperative arterial line blood pressures.

Charles Huanghong Du1, David Glick2, Avery Tung3.   

Abstract

Electronic medical records now store a wealth of intraoperative hemodynamic data. However, analysis of such data is plagued by artifacts related to the monitoring environment. Here, we present an algorithm for automated identification of artifacts and replacement using interpolation of arterial line blood pressures. After IRB approval, minute-by-minute digital recordings of systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressures (MAP) obtained during anesthesia care were analyzed using predetermined metrics to identify values anomalous from adjacent neighbors. Anomalous data points were then replaced with linear interpolation of neighbors. The algorithm was then validated against manual artifact identification in 54 anesthesia records and 41,384 arterial line measurements. To assess the algorithm's effect on data analysis, we calculated the percent of time spent with MAP below 55 mmHg and above 100 mmHg for both raw and conditioned datasets. Manual review of the dataset identified 1.23% of all pressure readings as artifactual. When compared to manual review, the algorithm identified artifacts with 87.0% sensitivity and 99.4% specificity. The average difference between manual review and algorithm in identifying the start of arterial line monitoring was 0.17, and 2.1 min for the end of monitoring. Application of the algorithm decreased the percent of time below 55 mmHg from 4.3 to 2.0% (2.1% with manual review) and time above 100 mmHg from 8.8 to 7.3% (7.3% manual). This algorithm's performance was comparable to manual review by a human anesthesiologist and reduced the incidence of abnormal MAP values identified using a sample analysis tool.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Algorithm; Arterial line pressure; Artifact identification; Intraoperative blood pressure

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29869762     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-018-0167-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  8 in total

1.  Preoperative and intraoperative predictors of cardiac adverse events after general, vascular, and urological surgery.

Authors:  Sachin Kheterpal; Michael O'Reilly; Michael J Englesbe; Andrew L Rosenberg; Amy M Shanks; Lingling Zhang; Edward D Rothman; Darrell A Campbell; Kevin K Tremper
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  Relationship between Intraoperative Hypotension, Defined by Either Reduction from Baseline or Absolute Thresholds, and Acute Kidney and Myocardial Injury after Noncardiac Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis.

Authors:  Vafi Salmasi; Kamal Maheshwari; Dongsheng Yang; Edward J Mascha; Asha Singh; Daniel I Sessler; Andrea Kurz
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 7.892

3.  Intraoperative core temperature patterns, transfusion requirement, and hospital duration in patients warmed with forced air.

Authors:  Zhuo Sun; Hooman Honar; Daniel I Sessler; Jarrod E Dalton; Dongsheng Yang; Krit Panjasawatwong; Armin F Deroee; Vafi Salmasi; Leif Saager; Andrea Kurz
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  Intraoperative tachycardia and hypertension are independently associated with adverse outcome in noncardiac surgery of long duration.

Authors:  David L Reich; Elliott Bennett-Guerrero; Carol A Bodian; Sabera Hossain; Wanda Winfree; Marina Krol
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 5.  Is blood pressure control necessary before surgery?

Authors:  S D Wolfsthal
Journal:  Med Clin North Am       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 5.456

Review 6.  Optimal perioperative management of arterial blood pressure.

Authors:  Laurent Lonjaret; Olivier Lairez; Vincent Minville; Thomas Geeraerts
Journal:  Integr Blood Press Control       Date:  2014-09-12

7.  Association between intraoperative blood pressure and postoperative delirium in elderly hip fracture patients.

Authors:  Nae-Yuh Wang; Ai Hirao; Frederick Sieber
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The SLUScore: A Novel Method for Detecting Hazardous Hypotension in Adult Patients Undergoing Noncardiac Surgical Procedures.

Authors:  Wolf H Stapelfeldt; Hui Yuan; Jefferson K Dryden; Kristen E Strehl; Jacek B Cywinski; Jesse M Ehrenfeld; Pamela Bromley
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 5.108

  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  Automated anesthesia artifact analysis: can machines be trained to take out the garbage?

Authors:  Allan F Simpao; Olivia Nelson; Luis M Ahumada
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2020-09-12       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 2.  Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing end of year summary 2019: hemodynamic monitoring and management.

Authors:  Bernd Saugel; Lester A H Critchley; Thomas Kaufmann; Moritz Flick; Karim Kouz; Simon T Vistisen; Thomas W L Scheeren
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2020-03-14       Impact factor: 2.502

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.