Literature DB >> 29869712

Effect of circulatory system response to motor control in one-sided contractions.

Terumasa Takahara1, Hidetaka Yamaguchi2, Kazutoshi Seki3, Megumi Murata4, Sho Onodera5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to clarify the effect one-sided skeletal muscle contraction has on the circulatory system, spinal α-motoneuron excitability, and somatosensory-system-evoked potential.
METHOD: Nine healthy males maintained tension at 10, 20, and 30% of maximal voluntary contraction in static gripping in right hand. Heart rate, ln high frequency (HF), blood pressure (BP), F-wave, and somatosensory-evoked potential (SEP) were recorded during gripping task. BP, F-wave and SEP were recorded from left hand (contralateral side from contracting side). RESULT AND
CONCLUSION: There were significant main effects of contractions strength on heart rate (0%: 68.2 ± 6.8 bpm, 10%: 67.6 ± 7.4 bpm, 20%: 69.7 ± 8.5 bpm, 30%: 73.7 ± 9.3 bpm, F3.24=9.18, P < 0.01), systolic BP (0%: 127.7 ± 15 mmHg, 10%: 136.2 ± 13.5 mmHg, 20%: 136.2 ± 13.5 mmHg, 30%: 140.0 ± 17.1 mmHg, F3.24=23.93, P < 0.01), diastolic BP (0%: 69.3 ± 8.5 mmHg, 10%: 76.9 ± 11.1 mmHg, 20%: 79.9 ± 12.5 mmHg, 30%: 86.2 ± 14 mmHg, F3.24=17.09, P < 0.01), and F-wave appearance rate (0%: 29.7 ± 15.6%, 10%: 39.3 ± 20.5%, 20%: 47.5 ± 22.9%, 30%: 55.2 ± 21.8%, F3.24=14.04, P < 0.01). For the ln HF (0%: 5.9 ± 0.6, 10%: 6.3 ± 0.9, 20%: 6.3 ± 1.3, 30%: 6.0 ± 1.0, F3.24=2.43, P = 0.08), F-wave latency (0%: 29.6 ± 1.7 ms, 10%: 26.9 ± 2.1 ms, 20%: 26.5 ± 3.6 ms, 30%: 26.9 ± 2.3 ms, F3.24=0.11, P = 0.96), F-wave amplitude (0%: 2.0 ± 0.9%, 10%: 2.2 ± 0.9%, 20%: 2.3 ± 0.7%, 30%: 2.8 ± 1.1%, F3.24=2.80, P = 0.06), and N20 amplitude (0%: 3.9 ± 1.7 µV, 10%: 3.7 ± 1.7 µV, 20%: 3.9 ± 1.7 µV, 30%: 3.9 ± 1.8 µV, F3.24=0.61, P = 0.62), between the conditions. We conclude that regulation of the circulatory system and motor system has a limited effect on sensory input.

Keywords:  Autonomic nervous system; Circulatory response; F-wave; One-sided contraction; Somatosensory-evoked potential

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29869712     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-018-3907-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  22 in total

1.  Magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex evokes skin sympathetic nerve activity.

Authors:  D H Silber; L I Sinoway; U A Leuenberger; V E Amassian
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2000-01

2.  Suppression of cerebral evoked potentials preceding rapid reaction movement.

Authors:  Y Nishihira; H Araki; A Ishihara
Journal:  J Sports Med Phys Fitness       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 1.637

3.  The use of F-waves as a probe for motor cortex excitability.

Authors:  Michael H Rivner
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  The modulation of somatosensory evoked potentials during the foreperiod of a forewarned reaction time task.

Authors:  K B Böcker; R Forget; C H Brunia
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1993 Mar-Apr

5.  Movement-induced gain modulation of somatosensory potentials and soleus H-reflexes evoked from the leg. I. Kinaesthetic task demands.

Authors:  W R Staines; J D Brooke; J Cheng; J E Misiaszek; W A MacKay
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Selective gating of lower limb cortical somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) during passive and active foot movements.

Authors:  M Tinazzi; G Zanette; F La Porta; A Polo; D Volpato; A Fiaschi; F Mauguière
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-07

7.  Specific gating of the early somatosensory evoked potentials during active movement.

Authors:  G Cheron; S Borenstein
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1987-12

8.  Discharge characteristics of human muscle afferents during muscle stretch and contraction.

Authors:  K E Hagbarth; A B Vallbo
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1968-12       Impact factor: 5.330

9.  Augmented forearm vasoconstriction during dynamic exercise in healthy older men.

Authors:  J A Taylor; G A Hand; D G Johnson; D R Seals
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Effect of lower limb exercise on forearm vascular function: contribution of nitric oxide.

Authors:  Daniel Green; Craig Cheetham; Louise Mavaddat; Katie Watts; Matthew Best; Roger Taylor; Gerard O'Driscoll
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.733

View more
  3 in total

1.  Autonomic laterality in caloric vestibular stimulation.

Authors:  Mohammadreza Aghababaei Ziarati; Mohammad Hosein Taziki; Seyed Mehran Hosseini
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2020-04-26

2.  Modulation of subjective peripheral sensation, F-waves, and somatosensory evoked potentials in response to unilateral pinch task measured on the contractile and non-contractile sides.

Authors:  Terumasa Takahara; Hidetaka Yamaguchi; Kazutoshi Seki; Sho Onodera
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Sensory gating and suppression of subjective peripheral sensations during voluntary muscle contraction.

Authors:  Terumasa Takahara; Hidetaka Yamaguchi; Kazutoshi Seki; Sho Onodera
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 3.288

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.