Katherine Petrie1,2, Josie Milligan-Saville1,2, Aimée Gayed2, Mark Deady1,2, Andrea Phelps3,4, Lisa Dell3,4, David Forbes3,4, Richard A Bryant5, Rafael A Calvo6, Nicholas Glozier7, Samuel B Harvey8,9. 1. Black Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Hospital Road, Randwick, NSW, 2031, Australia. 2. School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia. 3. Phoenix Australia, Centre for Posttraumatic Mental Health, Carlton, VIC, Australia. 4. Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC, Australia. 5. School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia. 6. School of Electrical and Information Engineering, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. 7. Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. 8. Black Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Hospital Road, Randwick, NSW, 2031, Australia. s.harvey@unsw.edu.au. 9. School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia. s.harvey@unsw.edu.au.
Abstract
PURPOSE: There is increasing concern regarding the mental health impact of first responder work, with some reports suggesting ambulance personnel may be at particularly high risk. Through this systematic review and meta-analysis we aimed to determine the prevalence of mental health conditions among ambulance personnel worldwide. METHODS: A systematic search and screening process was conducted to identify studies for inclusion in the review. To be eligible, studies had to report original quantitative data on the prevalence of at least one of the following mental health outcome(s) of interest (PTSD, depression, anxiety, general psychological distress) for ambulance personnel samples. Quality of the studies was assessed using a validated methodological rating tool. Random effects modelling was used to estimate pooled prevalence, as well as subgroup analyses and meta-regressions for five variables implicated in heterogeneity. RESULTS: In total, 941 articles were identified across all sources, with 95 full-text articles screened to confirm eligibility. Of these, 27 studies were included in the systematic review, reporting on a total of 30,878 ambulance personnel. A total of 18 studies provided necessary quantitative information and were retained for entry in the meta-analysis. The results demonstrated estimated prevalence rates of 11% for PTSD, 15% for depression, 15% for anxiety, and 27% for general psychological distress amongst ambulance personnel, with date of data collection a significant influence upon observed heterogeneity. CONCLUSION: Ambulance personnel worldwide have a prevalence of PTSD considerably higher than rates seen in the general population, although there is some evidence that rates of PTSD may have decreased over recent decades.
PURPOSE: There is increasing concern regarding the mental health impact of first responder work, with some reports suggesting ambulance personnel may be at particularly high risk. Through this systematic review and meta-analysis we aimed to determine the prevalence of mental health conditions among ambulance personnel worldwide. METHODS: A systematic search and screening process was conducted to identify studies for inclusion in the review. To be eligible, studies had to report original quantitative data on the prevalence of at least one of the following mental health outcome(s) of interest (PTSD, depression, anxiety, general psychological distress) for ambulance personnel samples. Quality of the studies was assessed using a validated methodological rating tool. Random effects modelling was used to estimate pooled prevalence, as well as subgroup analyses and meta-regressions for five variables implicated in heterogeneity. RESULTS: In total, 941 articles were identified across all sources, with 95 full-text articles screened to confirm eligibility. Of these, 27 studies were included in the systematic review, reporting on a total of 30,878 ambulance personnel. A total of 18 studies provided necessary quantitative information and were retained for entry in the meta-analysis. The results demonstrated estimated prevalence rates of 11% for PTSD, 15% for depression, 15% for anxiety, and 27% for general psychological distress amongst ambulance personnel, with date of data collection a significant influence upon observed heterogeneity. CONCLUSION: Ambulance personnel worldwide have a prevalence of PTSD considerably higher than rates seen in the general population, although there is some evidence that rates of PTSD may have decreased over recent decades.
Authors: Karen S Mitchell; Erika J Wolf; Michelle J Bovin; Lewina O Lee; Jonathan D Green; Raymond C Rosen; Terence M Keane; Brian P Marx Journal: J Abnorm Psychol Date: 2017-02-13
Authors: Elie G Karam; Matthew J Friedman; Eric D Hill; Ronald C Kessler; Katie A McLaughlin; Maria Petukhova; Laura Sampson; Victoria Shahly; Matthias C Angermeyer; Evelyn J Bromet; Giovanni de Girolamo; Ron de Graaf; Koen Demyttenaere; Finola Ferry; Silvia E Florescu; Josep Maria Haro; Yanling He; Aimee N Karam; Norito Kawakami; Viviane Kovess-Masfety; María Elena Medina-Mora; Mark A Oakley Browne; José A Posada-Villa; Arieh Y Shalev; Dan J Stein; Maria Carmen Viana; Zahari Zarkov; Karestan C Koenen Journal: Depress Anxiety Date: 2013-08-27 Impact factor: 6.505
Authors: Laura Goodwin; Ilan Ben-Zion; Nicola T Fear; Matthew Hotopf; Stephen A Stansfeld; Simon Wessely Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-11-04 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Mathias Maleczek; Karl Schebesta; Thomas Hamp; Achim Leo Burger; Thomas Pezawas; Mario Krammel; Bernhard Roessler Journal: Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Date: 2022-07-15 Impact factor: 3.803
Authors: Matt T Richins; Louis Gauntlett; Noreen Tehrani; Ian Hesketh; Dale Weston; Holly Carter; Richard Amlôt Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2020-06-25
Authors: Christi M Gendron; Tuhin S Chakraborty; Brian Y Chung; Zachary M Harvanek; Kristina J Holme; Jacob C Johnson; Yang Lyu; Allyson S Munneke; Scott D Pletcher Journal: Annu Rev Physiol Date: 2019-10-21 Impact factor: 22.163
Authors: Gloria Obuobi-Donkor; Vincent Israel Opoku Agyapong; Ejemai Eboreime; Jennifer Bond; Natalie Phung; Scarlett Eyben; Jake Hayward; Yanbo Zhang; Frank MacMaster; Steven Clelland; Russell Greiner; Chelsea Jones; Bo Cao; Suzette Brémault-Phillips; Kristopher Wells; Xin-Min Li; Carla Hilario; Andrew J Greenshaw Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2022-04-25