| Literature DB >> 29869523 |
Jennifer Pasquier1,2,3, Vimal Ramachandran4, Moh'd Rasheed Abu-Qaoud1,2, Binitha Thomas2, Manasi J Benurwar4, Omar Chidiac2, Jessica Hoarau-Véchot2, Amal Robay2,3, Khalid Fakhro2,5, Robert A Menzies6, Amin Jayyousi6, Mahmoud Zirie6, Jassim Al Suwaidi6, Rayaz A Malik7,8, Talal K Talal6, Seyed Hani Najafi-Shoushtari4,9, Arash Rafii1,2, Charbel Abi Khalil2,3,7,8.
Abstract
AIM: Charcot foot (CF) is a rare complication of Type 2 diabetes (T2D). MATERIALS &Entities:
Keywords: Charcot foot; diabetes; epigenetics; inflammation; micro-RNA
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29869523 PMCID: PMC6240850 DOI: 10.2217/epi-2018-0052
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Epigenomics ISSN: 1750-192X Impact factor: 4.778
Principal characteristics of the patients included in the study. Diabetes but no neuropathy (G3), diabetes with neuropathy (G2) and diabetes with both neuropathy and Charcot foot (G1). Data are represented as mean (SD) or number (%).
| Age, years | 55.76 (9.53) | 54.35 (9.21) | 53.76 (9.21) | 0.81 |
| Gender (male/female) | 11/6 | 12/5 | 12/5 | 0.75 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 31.33 (5.86) | 34.34 (7.12) | 29.93 (3.84) | 0.08 |
| HbA1c, % | 8.1% (1.80) | 8.36% (2.12) | 8.24% (1.90) | 0.92 |
| Fasting glucose, mmol/L | 9.33 (4.51) | 10.69 (7.01) | 10.28 (4.31) | 0.75 |
| Diabetes duration, years | 15.23 (5.50) | 15 (7.41) | 8.47 (6.42) | 0.0049 |
| Systolic BP, mmHg | 135.64 (18.53) | 135.64 (16.57) | 131.5 (15.95) | 0.74 |
| Diastolic BP, mmHg | 73.29 (6.97) | 74.36 (10.04) | 77.06 (9.21) | 0.48 |
| eGFR, ml/min | 82.81 (34.38) | 73.59 (46.30) | 94.69 (19.42) | 0.22 |
BP: Blood pressure; eGFR: Estimated glomerular filtration rate.
Volcano plots.
Volcano plots showing differentially expressed miRNAs in the following comparisons: T2D with Charcot foot over T2D with neuropathy (Group 1 vs Group 2) (A); T2D with Charcot foot over T2D without neuropathy (Group 1 vs Group 3) (B); and T2D with neuropathy over T2D without neuropathy (Group 2 vs Group 3) (C). miRNAs with more than twofold change and a significant p-value after applying Bonferroni correction are shown in green. Those, which show more than twofold change but whose p-value significance is achieved by discounting Bonferroni correction are shown in yellow. Gray dots represent miRNAs exhibiting less than twofold change, while red dots stand for those showing more than twofold change but lacking statistical significance. Solid vertical lines indicate twofold upregulation or downregulation on the log scale. Dashed horizontal lines either mark p-value = 0.05 on the log scale (red line), or Bonferroni-corrected p-value cut-off (green line).
T2D: Type 2 diabetes.
Venn diagram.
A three-way Venn diagram representing the apparition of miRNAs in each comparison. The one in the center (black) appears in every contrast, the one at the merging of two circles (orange, purple, green) appears in two comparisons and the one in one circle only (yellow, red, blue) appears in only one set of data.
A network of predicted genes affected by differentially expressed miRNA from G1 versus G2 comparison created by Ingenuity Pathway Analysis.
The networks hypothesized by Ingenuity Pathway Analysis are based on the molecular relationships, interactions and pathway associations between the methylated candidate genes as shown in a graphical representation.
Role of miRNA differentially expressed between G1 versus G2 in the osteoclast differentiation.
The graphical representation had been generated by Ingenuity Pathway Analysis and reflects the molecular relationships between miRNAs and candidate genes. miRNAs in red were overexpressed in Charcot foot (CF) patients as compared with Type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients with neuropathy, while the ones in green were downexpressed in CF patients compared with T2D patients with neuropathy.
miRNAs differentially expressed between G1 and G2 and involved in the osteoclast differentiation.
The color corresponds to the group defined within the Venn diagram (Figure 2). The three miRNAs inside the bold square are the one that passed the Bonferroni significance.