Literature DB >> 29869119

Using Virtual Human Technology to Examine Weight Bias and the Role of Patient Weight on Student Assessment of Pediatric Pain.

Shana L Boyle1, David M Janicke2, Michael E Robinson3, Laura D Wandner4.   

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to investigate the influence of weight bias and demographic characteristics on the assessment of pediatric chronic pain. Weight status, race, and sex were manipulated in a series of virtual human (VH) digital images of children. Using a web-based platform, 96 undergraduate students with health care-related majors (e.g., Health Science, Nursing, Biology, and Pre-Medicine) read a clinical vignette and provided five ratings targeting the assessment of each VH child's pain. Students also answered a weight bias questionnaire. Group-based analyses were conducted to determine the influence of the VH child's weight and demographic cues, as well as greater weight bias on assessment ratings. Male and VH children with obesity were rated as more likely to avoid non-preferred activities due to pain compared to female and healthy weight children, respectively (both p < .001). The pain of VH children with obesity was rated as more likely to be influenced by psychological/behavioral issues compared to the pain of healthy weight VH children (p = .022). African American VH children were rated as experiencing significantly greater pain than Caucasian VH children (p = .037). As child weight increased, low weight bias participants felt more sympathy, while high weight bias participants felt less sympathy (p = .002). Also, low weight bias participants showed increased motivation to help, while high weight bias participants showed less motivation to help, as VH patient weight increased (p = .008). Child weight and evaluator weight bias may be influential in the assessment of pediatric pain. If supported by future research, results highlight the importance of training in evidence-based practice and education on weight bias for students majoring in health-care fields.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bias; Children; Obesity; Pain

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 29869119     DOI: 10.1007/s10880-018-9569-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings        ISSN: 1068-9583


  47 in total

1.  Parental perceptions of weight terminology that providers use with youth.

Authors:  Rebecca M Puhl; Jamie Lee Peterson; Joerg Luedicke
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Fat phobia scale revisited: the short form.

Authors:  J G Bacon; K E Scheltema; B E Robinson
Journal:  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord       Date:  2001-02

3.  Knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes of dental and dental hygiene students toward obesity.

Authors:  Kelly R Magliocca; Marvin F Jabero; Dale L Alto; Joseph F Magliocca
Journal:  J Dent Educ       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.264

4.  The assessment and management of acute pain in infants, children, and adolescents.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  A multinational examination of weight bias: predictors of anti-fat attitudes across four countries.

Authors:  R M Puhl; J D Latner; K O'Brien; J Luedicke; S Danielsdottir; M Forhan
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 5.095

6.  The impact of obesity on primary care visits.

Authors:  Klea D Bertakis; Rahman Azari
Journal:  Obes Res       Date:  2005-09

7.  Development and validation of a virtual human vignette to compare nurses' assessment and intervention choices for pain in critically ill children.

Authors:  Cynthia M LaFond; Catherine Van Hulle Vincent; Sangyoon Lee; Colleen Corte; Patricia E Hershberger; Andrew Johnson; Chang G Park; Diana J Wilkie
Journal:  Simul Healthc       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.929

8.  Obesity in the pediatric headache population: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Andrew D Hershey; Scott W Powers; Timothy D Nelson; Marielle A Kabbouche; Paul Winner; Marcy Yonker; Steven L Linder; Alma Bicknese; Michael K Sowel; William McClintock
Journal:  Headache       Date:  2009-01-09       Impact factor: 5.887

9.  Childhood obesity: issues of weight bias.

Authors:  Reginald L Washington
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2011-08-15       Impact factor: 2.830

10.  Medical student bias and care recommendations for an obese versus non-obese virtual patient.

Authors:  S Persky; C P Eccleston
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 5.095

View more
  2 in total

1.  Examining delays in diagnosis for slipped capital femoral epiphysis from a health disparities perspective.

Authors:  Maureen Purcell; Rustin Reeves; Matthew Mayfield
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  The nursing care of people with class III obesity in an acute care setting: a scoping review.

Authors:  Beverley Ewens; Vivien Kemp; Amanda Towell-Barnard; Lisa Whitehead
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2022-01-28
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.