Bobby V M Dasari1, Sarah Al-Shakhshir2, Timothy M Pawlik3, Tahir Shah4, Ravi Marudanayagam2, Robert P Sutcliffe2, Darius F Mirza2, Paolo Muiesan2, Keith J Roberts2, John Isaac2. 1. Department of HPB and Liver Transplantation Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK. bobby.dasari@uhb.nhs.uk. 2. Department of HPB and Liver Transplantation Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK. 3. Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Centre, Columbus, OH, USA. 4. Department of Hepatology and Centre for Neuroendocrine Tumours, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Duodenal neuroendocrine tumours (dNETs) comprise about 2% of all the NETs. Treatment of dNETs involves resection of the tumour either by endoscopic or surgical resection. Surgical or endoscopic local resection of the lesion is usually a more conservative and less morbid option compared with a more radical pancreaticoduodenectomy. However, inadequate clearance by local resection might result in recurrent disease with reduced overall survival. METHODS: The current systematic review compared the differences in outcomes of endoscopic resection (ER), local resection (LR) and pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) in the management of dNETs. Searches were performed on MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases using MeSH keyword combinations: 'duodenal', AND, 'neuroendocrine tumours'. All relevant articles published up to 2016 were included. Post-operative morbidity, R0 resection status and recurrence rates were the outcomes assessed. RESULTS: Eight non-randomised retrospective studies with 335 participants were included (LR = 122; PD = 118; ER = 64). While PD was associated with higher morbidity compared with LR (27/64 vs. 10/74; P = 0.002), PD was associated with a higher incidence of an R0 resection (3/97 vs. 15/97; P = 0.007) as well as lower recurrence rates (3/51 vs. 6/46; P = 0.21). ER was associated with a higher positive resection margin status versus LR (22/51 vs. 14/91; P = 0.0002). Recurrence at follow-up was not different among patients with dNETs who underwent PD versus LR. CONCLUSIONS: Radical surgical resection in the form of PD was associated with higher post-operative morbidity among patients with dNETs yet provided better margin clearance. Patients with dNETs need systematic evaluation with a view to obtain most of the information about the prognostic factors in order to tailor the treatment options.
INTRODUCTION:Duodenal neuroendocrine tumours (dNETs) comprise about 2% of all the NETs. Treatment of dNETs involves resection of the tumour either by endoscopic or surgical resection. Surgical or endoscopic local resection of the lesion is usually a more conservative and less morbid option compared with a more radical pancreaticoduodenectomy. However, inadequate clearance by local resection might result in recurrent disease with reduced overall survival. METHODS: The current systematic review compared the differences in outcomes of endoscopic resection (ER), local resection (LR) and pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) in the management of dNETs. Searches were performed on MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases using MeSH keyword combinations: 'duodenal', AND, 'neuroendocrine tumours'. All relevant articles published up to 2016 were included. Post-operative morbidity, R0 resection status and recurrence rates were the outcomes assessed. RESULTS: Eight non-randomised retrospective studies with 335 participants were included (LR = 122; PD = 118; ER = 64). While PD was associated with higher morbidity compared with LR (27/64 vs. 10/74; P = 0.002), PD was associated with a higher incidence of an R0 resection (3/97 vs. 15/97; P = 0.007) as well as lower recurrence rates (3/51 vs. 6/46; P = 0.21). ER was associated with a higher positive resection margin status versus LR (22/51 vs. 14/91; P = 0.0002). Recurrence at follow-up was not different among patients with dNETs who underwent PD versus LR. CONCLUSIONS: Radical surgical resection in the form of PD was associated with higher post-operative morbidity among patients with dNETs yet provided better margin clearance. Patients with dNETs need systematic evaluation with a view to obtain most of the information about the prognostic factors in order to tailor the treatment options.
Authors: Sagar R Shroff; Vladimir M Kushnir; Sachin B Wani; Neil Gupta; Sreenivasa S Jonnalagadda; Faris Murad; Dayna S Early; Daniel K Mullady; Steven A Edmundowicz; Riad R Azar Journal: Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 1.719
Authors: Timothy Weatherall; Jason Denbo; John Sharpe; Michael Martin; Thomas O'Brien; Rajib Gupta; Kenneth Groshart; Stephen Behrman; Paxton Dickson Journal: World J Surg Date: 2017-03 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: J J Huang; C J Yeo; T A Sohn; K D Lillemoe; P K Sauter; J Coleman; R H Hruban; J L Cameron Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2000-06 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: James C Yao; Manal Hassan; Alexandria Phan; Cecile Dagohoy; Colleen Leary; Jeannette E Mares; Eddie K Abdalla; Jason B Fleming; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Asif Rashid; Douglas B Evans Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-06-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Catherine G Tran; Scott K Sherman; Mohammed O Suraju; Apoorve Nayyar; Henning Gerke; Rami G El Abiad; Chandrikha Chandrasekharan; Po Hien Ear; Thomas M O'Dorisio; Joseph S Dillon; Andrew M Bellizzi; James R Howe Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2021-09-13 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Servando Hernandez Vargas; Christie Lin; Solmaz AghaAmiri; Julie Voss; Naruhiko Ikoma; Hop S Tran Cao; Sukhen C Ghosh; Adam J Uselmann; Ali Azhdarinia Journal: Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng Date: 2020-02-19