Leah K Winer1, Vikrom K Dhar1, Koffi Wima1, Tiffany C Lee1, Mackenzie C Morris1, Shimul A Shah1, Syed A Ahmad2, Sameer H Patel3,4. 1. Cincinnati Research on Outcomes and Safety in Surgery (CROSS), Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA. 2. Section of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 231 Albert Sabin Way (ML 0558), Cincinnati, OH, 45267-0558, USA. 3. Cincinnati Research on Outcomes and Safety in Surgery (CROSS), Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA. patel5se@ucmail.uc.edu. 4. Section of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 231 Albert Sabin Way (ML 0558), Cincinnati, OH, 45267-0558, USA. patel5se@ucmail.uc.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Our goal was to evaluate the relationship between perioperative fluid administration and the development of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). METHODS: Retrospectively, we analyzed fluid balance over the first 72 h in 104 consecutive patients who underwent PD between 2013 and 2017. Patients were categorized into tertiles (low, medium, and high) by net fluid balance. RESULTS: POPF was identified in 17.3% of patients (n = 18). No significant demographic differences were identified among tertiles. Similarly, there were no differences in ASA, smoking status, hemoglobin A1C, pathologic findings, operative time, blood loss, intraoperative fluid administration, use of pancreatic stents, use of epidurals, or postoperative lactate. Patients with high 72-h net fluid balance had significantly increased rates of POPF compared with those in the medium and low tertiles (31.4% vs. 11.4% vs. 8.8%, p = 0.02). On multivariate analysis, increasing net fluid balance remained associated with CR-POPF (OR 1.26, CI 1.03-1.55, p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: High net 72-h fluid balance is an independent predictor of POPF after PD. Given ongoing efforts to minimize PD morbidity, net fluid balance may represent a clinical predictor and, possibly, a modifiable target for prevention of POPF.
BACKGROUND: Our goal was to evaluate the relationship between perioperative fluid administration and the development of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). METHODS: Retrospectively, we analyzed fluid balance over the first 72 h in 104 consecutive patients who underwent PD between 2013 and 2017. Patients were categorized into tertiles (low, medium, and high) by net fluid balance. RESULTS: POPF was identified in 17.3% of patients (n = 18). No significant demographic differences were identified among tertiles. Similarly, there were no differences in ASA, smoking status, hemoglobin A1C, pathologic findings, operative time, blood loss, intraoperative fluid administration, use of pancreatic stents, use of epidurals, or postoperative lactate. Patients with high 72-h net fluid balance had significantly increased rates of POPF compared with those in the medium and low tertiles (31.4% vs. 11.4% vs. 8.8%, p = 0.02). On multivariate analysis, increasing net fluid balance remained associated with CR-POPF (OR 1.26, CI 1.03-1.55, p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: High net 72-h fluid balance is an independent predictor of POPF after PD. Given ongoing efforts to minimize PD morbidity, net fluid balance may represent a clinical predictor and, possibly, a modifiable target for prevention of POPF.
Authors: Jacqueline S Israel; Robert J Rettammel; Glen E Leverson; Laura R Hanks; Clifford S Cho; Emily R Winslow; Sharon M Weber Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2014-02-18 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Jordan M Winter; John L Cameron; Kurtis A Campbell; David C Chang; Taylor S Riall; Richard D Schulick; Michael A Choti; JoAnn Coleman; Mary B Hodgin; Patricia K Sauter; Christopher J Sonnenday; Christopher L Wolfgang; Michael R Marohn; Charles J Yeo Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Claudio Bassi; Giovanni Marchegiani; Christos Dervenis; Micheal Sarr; Mohammad Abu Hilal; Mustapha Adham; Peter Allen; Roland Andersson; Horacio J Asbun; Marc G Besselink; Kevin Conlon; Marco Del Chiaro; Massimo Falconi; Laureano Fernandez-Cruz; Carlos Fernandez-Del Castillo; Abe Fingerhut; Helmut Friess; Dirk J Gouma; Thilo Hackert; Jakob Izbicki; Keith D Lillemoe; John P Neoptolemos; Attila Olah; Richard Schulick; Shailesh V Shrikhande; Tadahiro Takada; Kyoichi Takaori; William Traverso; Charles R Vollmer; Christopher L Wolfgang; Charles J Yeo; Roberto Salvia; Marcus Buchler Journal: Surgery Date: 2016-12-28 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Oliver S Eng; Julie Goswami; Dirk Moore; Chunxia Chen; Christopher J Gannon; David A August; Darren R Carpizo Journal: J Surg Oncol Date: 2013-08-01 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: Birte Kulemann; Sylvia Timme; Gabriel Seifert; Philipp A Holzner; Torben Glatz; Olivia Sick; Sophia Chikhladze; Peter Bronsert; Jens Hoeppner; Martin Werner; Ulrich T Hopt; Goran Marjanovic Journal: Surgery Date: 2013-07-19 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Helmut Witzigmann; Markus K Diener; Stefan Kienkötter; Inga Rossion; Thomas Bruckner; Olaf Pridöhl; Olga Radulova-Mauersberger; Heike Lauer; Phillip Knebel; Alexis Ulrich; Oliver Strobel; Thilo Hackert; Markus W Büchler Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2016-09 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: J V Groen; A A J Khawar; P A Bauer; B A Bonsing; C H Martini; T H Mungroop; A L Vahrmeijer; J Vuijk; A Dahan; J S D Mieog Journal: BJS Open Date: 2019-04-29
Authors: Heejoon Jeong; Jie Ae Kim; Mikyung Yang; Hyun Joo Ahn; JinSeok Heo; In Woong Han; Sang Hyun Shin; Nam Young Lee; Woo Jin Kim Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-01-26 Impact factor: 4.241